Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

High-analysis granular sulphur assemblages as sources of sulphur for lucerne

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A growth chamber study was conducted to compare five granulated sulphur assemblages and a commercially available prilled sulphur with gypsum and flowers of sulphur as sources of sulphur for lucerne grown on two sulphur deficient soils, one from the Armstrong area of B.C. and one from California. Following one surface application of the various sulphur supplying materials at rates of 37.5 mg, 75 mg and 150 mg of sulphur per 3750 g of soil, four consecutive harvests were removed from the Enderby silt loam during a 145 day period and three cuttings were taken over a 119 day cropping interval on the Willits soil from California.

Although gypsum and finely divided sulphur were the most effective sources, three of the five assemblages also had a favourable influence upon yield of lucerne, sulphur concentration and sulphur uptake. The three acceptable assemblages were sulphur-bentonite, sulphur-goulac-ammonium sulphate and sulphur-gypsum-goulac and they produced beneficial effects upon lucerne growth that were often comparable to those obtained with finely divided sulphur.

On the basis of this investigation, it appears that certain granular high-analysis sulphur assemblages made from finely divided sulphur and binding agents, such as gypsum, ammonium sulphate, goulac and bentonite have satisfactory agronomic properties. Because these assemblages have suitable agronomic and physical properties they should be ideal for bulk blending with other granular fertilizer materials or for use in direct application to the soil. Wider scale testing of the sulphur-bentonite, sulphur-goulac-ammonium sulphate and sulphur-gypsum-goulac assemblages would seem to be justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous, Sulphur: The essential plant food element. The Sulphur Institute, 1725 K Street Northwest, Washington, D.C. (1967).

  2. Anonymous, New developments in fertilizer technology. Sixth Demonstration, October 4–5, 1966, TVA, Muscle Shoals, Alabama (1966).

  3. Anonymous, British Patent No. 1, 049,782, Fisons Fertilizer Ltd. describes a method of producing granular ammonium sulphate-nitrate fertilizers. Nitrogen, January–February, p. 45 (1967).

  4. Beaton, J. D., Harapiak, J. T., and Tisdale, S. L., Crop responses to sulphur in Western Canada. The Sulphur Inst. J.2(3), 9–16 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bixby, David W., Tisdale, Samuel L., and Rucker, Delbert L., Adding plant nutrient sulphur to fertilizer. Sulphur Inst. Washington, D.C. Technical Bulletin Number10 (1964).

  6. Bledsoe, R. W. and Blaser, R. F., The influence of sulphur on the yield and composition of clovers fertilized with different sources of phosphorus. Agron. J.2, 147–152 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boawn, Louis C., Sulphur deficiency of irrigated alfalfa in central Washington. Washington. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ.344 (1958).

  8. Duncan, David B., Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics11, 1–42 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, R. L., Flowerday, A. D., Hasterman, F. W., Rhodes, H. F., and Olsen, R. A., Sulphur fertilizers for alfalfa production in Nebraska. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Research Bull.214 (1964).

  10. Fox, R. L., Atesalp, H. M., Kampbell, D. H., and Rhoades, H. F., Factors influencing the availability of sulphur fertilizers to alfalfa and corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.28, 406–408 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hastings, W. F. and McGowan, J., Granulation of sulphur and soluble sulfate compounds. Croplife, 50–54 (March 1966).

  12. Johnson, C. M. and Ulrich, A. Analytical methods for use in plant analysis. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.766 (1959).

  13. Koehler, F. E. Sulphur fertilization in Eastern Washington. Pacific Proc. 16th Ann. Pacific Northwest Fertilizer Conf., pp. 27–29 (1965).

  14. Lobb, W. R. and Bennetts, R. L. Improvement of tussock grassland in Canterbury. New Zealand J. Agr.96, 537–549 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martin, W. E., The growing importance of sulphur fertilization in California. Sulphur Inst. J.1, 8–10 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mason, J. L., Plant nutrition and characterization of the fertility status of soils. Second British Columbia Soil Sci. Workshop Report, November 4–5, Vancouver, British Columbia (1963).

  17. Pumphrey, F. V. and Moore, D. P., Sulphur and nitrogen content of herbage during growth. Agron. J.57, 237–239 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pumphrey, F. V. and Moore, D. P., Diagnosing sulphur deficiency in alfalfa from plant analysis. Agron. J.57, 364–366, (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reisenauer, H. M. and Leggett, G. E., Eastern Washington soils need sulphur. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ.317 (1957).

  20. Rendig, V. V., Sulphur and nitrogen composition of fertilized and unfertilized alfalfa grown on a sulphur deficient soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.20, 237–240 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw, W. M., Sulphur determination: Nitric-perchloric acid oxidation for sulphur in plant and animal tissues. J. Agr. Food Chem.7, 843–847 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sprout, P. N. and Kelley, C. C., Soil Survey of the North Okanagan Valley. Interim Report. B.C. Dept. of Agr., Kelowna, British Columbia (1960).

  23. Storie, R. Earl and Weir, Walter W., Soil series of California. The National Press. Palo Alto, California (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tisdale, Samuel L., Sulphur: The limiting factor. Agricultural Ammonia NewsXIII, 21–23 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tisdale, Samuel L., Sulphur as a plant nutrient. Croplife, February (1964).

  26. Tisdale, Samuel L. and Nelson, Werner L., Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Second Edition. The Macmillan Company, New York, pp. 300–305 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walker, T. W., Adamas, A. F. R., and Orchiston, H. D., The effect of levels of calcium sulphate on the yield and composition of a grass and clover pasture. Plant and Soil7, 290–300 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Williams, William A., McKell, Cyrus M., and Reppert, Jack N., Sulfur fertilization of an annual-range soil during years of below-normal rainfall. J. Range Management17, 1–5 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. J. D. Beaton

    Present address: The Sulphur Institute, Washington, D.C.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Trail, B.C. and Research Station Canada Department of Agriculture, Cominco Ltd., Kamloops, B.C., Canada

    J. D. Beaton & W. A. Hubbard

Authors
  1. J. D. Beaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. A. Hubbard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper was presented before the 12th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society of Soil Science, June 28, 1967, Macdonald College, Quebec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beaton, J.D., Hubbard, W.A. High-analysis granular sulphur assemblages as sources of sulphur for lucerne. Plant Soil 30, 373–390 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01881964

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01881964

Keywords

Search

Navigation