Skip to main content
Log in

The decomposition of sugar beet residues: mineralization versus immobilization in contrasting soil types

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The leaves and crowns from 15N-labelled sugar beets were incubated in either a silty clay loam or sand soil for almost one year. Four additions of fresh, chopped residues mixed with soil were tested: 15N-labelled leaves alone, 15N-labelled leaves plus unlabelled crowns, unlabelled leaves plus 15N-labelled crowns, and 15N-labelled crowns alone; a control with no addition was also incubated. The C:N ratio of the leaves was 11 and that of the crowns 40. Incubations were carried out in pots kept at 20 °C and optimal moisture conditions. The leaves mineralized N from the start of the experiment but the addition of crowns to soil at first caused immobilization of nitrogen followed eventually by mineralization after 6 or 12 weeks depending on soil type. The extra amounts of mineral N found in soil at the end of the experiment where additions were made corresponded to the sum of the background mineralization and the addition; no priming effects were encountered. Very slight differences only were found between the initial rates of mineralization of C in all of the treatments. Although there was also little difference between the sand and silty clay loam soils in the direct mineralization of nitrogen from the sugar beet leaves, where N was first immobilized (i.e. from crowns or a mixture) re-release of N took place more quickly in the sand soil. The total recovery of15 N found in soils after 24 weeks incubation ranged from 70% to 90% with least being lost from the sugar-rich but N-deficient crowns. Where leaves plus crowns were incubated together both residues contributed to the microbial biomass N.

In practice, immobilization of this magnitude and duration (expressed as a temperature sum) could exceed the growth period of a spring sown crop. The actual immobilization found in any one field is likely to depend on the C:N ratio of the residues and could account for much of the variation in the residual benefit of sugar beet residues reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abshahi A, Hills F J and Broadbent F E 1984 Nitrogen Utilization by wheat from residual sugar beet fertilizer and soil incorporated sugar beet tops. Agron. J. 76, 954-958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosatta E and Ågren GI 1985 Theoretical analysis of decomposition of heterogeneous substrates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 601-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiß U 1987 —Zuckerrübenblatt-Umsetzung und Wirkung bei Verbleib auf dem Feld. Zuckerindustrie 112, 531-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer E and van Kessel C 1990 Extractability of microbial 14C and 15N following addition of variable rates of labelled glucose and (NH4)2SO4 to soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 707-713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes P C, Landman A, Pruden G and Jenkinson D S 1985 Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method from measuring microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 837-842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crohain A and Rixhon L 1967 —La valeur fertilisante pratique des feuilles et collets de betterave sucrière. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 3, 392-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin S 1994 Importance of water-soluble C in filter paper on the determination of microbial C by the fumigation-extraction method. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1455-1456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deijs W B 1961 The determination of total nitrogen in herbage samples. Instituut voor Biologish en Scheikundig Onderzoek van Landbouwgewassen Wageningen. Jaarboek Mededelingen 89-90 (In Dutch).

  • Hassink J and Whitmore A P 1997 A model of the protection of organic matter in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 131-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson D S, Fox R H and Rayner J H 1985 Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen-the so-called ‘priming’ effect. J. Soil Sci. 36, 425-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson D S and Rayner J H 1977 The tumover of soil organic matter in some of the Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Sci. 123, 298-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmeyer H 1985 Die stickstoffmineralisation von Zuckerr übenblatt im Boden. Dissertation Univ. Hannover.

  • Vilsmeier K and Gutser R 1988 —Modellversuche zur N-Mineralisation aus Zuckerrübenblättern. Landwirt. Forsch. 41, 210-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Erp P J, Whitmore A P and Wilting P 1993 —Mineralisatie van stikstof uit gewasresten van suikerbieten na de oogst. Meststoffen 1993, 64-70 (In Dutch).

  • Vance E D, Brookes P C and Jenkinson D S 1987 An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 703-707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir AH, Bragg P L, Porter J R and Rayner J H 1984 A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 102, 371-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore A P 1996a Describing the mineralization of carbon added to soil in crop residues using second-order kinetics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 1435-1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore A P 1996b Alternative kinetic laws to describe the turnover of the microbial biomass. Plant Soil 181, 169-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore A P and Matus F J 1996 The decomposition of wheat and clover residues in soil measurements and modelling. InProgress in Nitrogen Cycling Studies. Eds. O van Cleemput, G Hofman and A Vermoesen. Devel. Plant Soil Sci. 68, pp 465-469. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnands F G Kroonen-Backbier B M A Hofmeester Y van Leeuwen-Haagsma WK, Boerma J and van Dongen G J M 1992 The development of integrated farming systems. Farming Systerns for the Agriculture of the Future. Themaboekje 14, PAGV, Lelystad 9-125 (In Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitmore, A., Groot, J. The decomposition of sugar beet residues: mineralization versus immobilization in contrasting soil types. Plant and Soil 192, 237–247 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004288828793

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004288828793

Navigation