Abstract
It is well known that the microstructure of metal-matrix composite materials is significantly different from that of the unreinforced matrix. Heat treatments which optimized strength values in the matrix therefore, no longer do so in the composite. It is thus beneficial to find these variations in the heat treatment process, and to pinpoint the microstructural mechanisms responsible. It is known that, in addition to a higher dislocation density, the composite also has a very fine grain size and many whisker interfacial nucleation sites. This study has found that the time required for solutionizing appears to be much shorter in the composite primarily due to the very small grain size. It was also observed that artificial ageing was not very effective in the composite since the precipitates nucleated and grew on the whisker interfaces, therefore, only natural ageing was necessary to achieve peak tensile and yield strengths.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. V. Nair, J. K. Tien andR. O. Bates,Int. Met. Rev. 30 (1985) 275.
T. G. Nieh andR. F. Karlak,J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 2 (1983) 119.
D. L. McDanels,Met. Trans. 16A (1985) 1105.
Y. Fujita, H. Fukumoto andY. Kurita,ICCM andECCM,2 (1987) 2.340.
T. Christman andS. Suresh, Brown University Report # NSF-ENG-8451092, 1987.
T. G. Nieh andR. F. Karlak,Scripta Metall. 18 (1984) 27.
I. Dutta, D. Bourell andD. Latimer,J. Compos. Mater. 22 (1988) 829.
M. Vogelsang, R. J. Arsenault andR. Fisher,Met. Trans. 17A (1986) 379.
R. Schueller andF. Wawner, inJ. Compos. Mater. Oct, (1990)24 No. 10 (1990) 1060.
“Metals Handbook”, 9th Edn, Vol. 4 (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1985) p. 684.
“Metals Handbook”, 8th Edn, Vol. 8 (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1973) p. 45.
“Aluminum: Properties and Physical Metallurgy”, ted by J. E. Hatch (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1984) p. 138.
“Aluminum: Properties and Physical Metallurgy”, edited by J. E. Hatch (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1984) p. 362.
Ph. Jarry, W. Loue andJ. Bouvaist, ICCM & ECCM, in proceedings of the 6th International conference on composite materials, Vol. 2, 1987, edited by F. Matthews, N. Buskell, J. Hodgkinson and J. Morton (Elsevier, New York, 1987) pp. 2.350–2.361.
P. G. Shewmon, “Diffusion in Solids” (McGraw Hill, New York, 1963) p. 176.
A. L. Ruoff, “Material Science” (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1973) p. 465.
M. A. Meyers andK. K. Chawla, “Mechanical Metallurgy” (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984) p. 276.
N. L. Peterson andS. J. Rothman,Phys. Rev. B1 (1970) 3264.
N. A. Gjostein, “Diffusion” (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1973) p. 263.
A. L. Ruoff, “Material Science” (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1973) 457.
A. Guinier,Acta Crystallogr. 5 (1952) 51.
R. B. Nicholson andJ. Nutting,Phil. Mag. 3 (1958) 531.
“Metals Handbook”, 9th Edn, Vol. 4 (ASM, Metals, OH, 1985) p. 698.
G. W. Lorimer, “Precipitation Processes in Solids”, edited by K. C. Russel and H. I. Aaronson (The Metall. Society of AIME Metals Park, OH, 1978) pp. 87–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schueller, R.D., Wawner, F.E. Effects of microstructure on optimum heat treatment conditions in metal-matrix composites. J Mater Sci 26, 3287–3291 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124675
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124675