Skip to main content
Log in

Biological control of pigweeds (Amaranthus retroflexus, L. A. Powellii, S. Watson and A. bouchonii Thell.) with phytophagous insects, fungal pathogens and crop management

  • Published:
Integrated Pest Management Reviews

Abstract

Pigweeds (Amaranthus spp.) are of economic importance worldwide. In Europe, Amaranthus retroflexus is one of the ten weed species of greatest economic importance. It is a serious problem weed in several field crops (e.g. maize), as well as in vegetables, orchards and grape vines. It is an annual spreading by seeds which have a long viabilityand are dispersed principally by wind and water, but also by machinery. There is great variability in seed germination which renders control with post-emergence herbicides difficult. In addition, triazine herbicide-resistant populations occur in ten European countries. The aim of this subproject of COST action 816 is to investigate the possibilities of classical and inundative biological control of Amaranthus spp., to characterize potentialbiological control agents and to develop methods for their integration with current phytosanitary measures in the target crops. The project was initiated with an extended literaturesurvey followed by field surveys for insects and pathogens associated with Amaranthus spp. in several European countries. Promising isolates of fungal pathogens have been tested ondetached leaves and whole plants, and initial studies on the application of pathogens causing damping off in seedlings have been made. Further, the variability of different provenances ofAmaranthus spp. in response to fungal attack has been investigated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammon, H.U. (1994) From weed control to regulation of green cover crops in maize. Rev. Suisse Agricult 26,28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammon, H.U. and Bohren, C. (1990) Breitband-Frässaat von Mais in Wiesen-und Gründüngungsbeständen mit Mulch-Schnitt zwischen den Reihen. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, Sonderh. XII,229–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammon, H.U., Dubois, D. and Bohren, C. (1996) Späte Unkrautbekämpfung in Rüben mit Glufosinate–ein Anbauverfahren zur Nützlingsförderung. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz Sonderh. XV,593–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aufhammer, W., Lee, J.H., Kübler, E., Kuhn, M. and Wagner, S. (1995) Production and utilisation of the pseudocereals buck-wheat (Fagopyron esculentumMoench), quinoa (Chenopodium quinoaWilld.) and amarant (Amaranthusspp. L.) as grain crops. Die Bodenkultur 46,125–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baloch, G.M., Khan, A.G. and Zafar, T. (1977) Investigations on the Insect Enemies ofAbutilon, Amaranthus, Rumex andSorghum in Pakistan. Report of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Pakistan Station, 1975–1976.

  • Balsbaugh, E.U., Jr, Frye, R.D., Scholl, C.G. and Anderson, A.W. (1981) Insects for weed control: status in North Dakota. North Dakota Farm Research 39,3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barralis, G. and Gasquez, J. (1987) Investigations on herbicide resistant weeds. Newsletter of the European Weed Research Society 38,5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, I.J. and Baskin, C.C. (1977) Role of temperature in the germination ecology of three summer annual weeds. Oecologia 30,377–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, L.E., Kim, K.U., Kozak, C.M. and Horn, D.J. (1981) An Annotated Bibliography of Weeds as Reservoirs For Organisms Affecting Crops. IIa. Arthropods. Wooster, OH: Research Bulletin 1125, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, W. (1985) Parasitische Pilze an Gefässpflanzen in Europa, pp. 124–25. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brust, G.E. (1994) Seed-predators reduce broadleaf weed growth and competitive ability. Agricult Ecosyst. Environ. 48,27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane, J.H., Buchmann, S.L. and LaBerge, W.E. (1992) The solitary bee Melissodes thelypodiiCockerell (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) collects pollen from wind-pollinated Amaranthus palmeri Watson. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 68,97–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charudattan, R. (1994) Status report of the University of Florida, Plant Pathology Department, Gainesville, FL, USA. International Bioherbicide Group IBG News 3,8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M.J. (1987) In A.J. Gray, M.J. Crawley and P.J. Edwards (eds) Colonization succession and stabilitypp. 429–53. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, D.F., Bills, G.F., Chamuris, G.P. and Rossman, A.Y. (1989) Fungi on Plants and Plant Products in the United States. St Paul, MN: APS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R.A. and Cavers, P.B. (1975) The ecology of pigweed (Amaranthus) in Ontario. I. Interspecific and intraspecific variation in seed germination among local collections of A. powelliand A. retroflexus. Canadian Journal of Botany 53, 1276–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garman, H. (1892) The pigweed flea beetle. Second. Ann. Rep. Kentucky Agr. Exp. Sta. 18 89,27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gut, D. and Mayor, J.P. (1993) Herbizidresistente Unkräuter in Rebbergen (I). Landw. Schweiz 5,6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanf, M. (1984) Ackerunkraüter Europas mit ihren Keimlingen, pp. 166–70. Ludwigshafen: BASF AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (1971) Current approaches to biological control of weeds. Technical Communication, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 4,67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, C.R. and Stipanovic, R.D. (1984) Phytotoxicity to crop plants and herbicidal effects on weeds of viridiol produced by Gliocladium virens. Phytopathology 74,1346–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hügin, G. (1987) Einige Bemerkungen zu wenig bekannten Amaranthus-Sippen (Amaranthaceae) Mitteleuropas. Willdenowia 16,453–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttersonke, B. (1996) Investigations into the reaction of European provenances of Amaranthus retroflexusL. to environmental factors and fungous infection. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten Sonderh. XV,107–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katar’yan, B.T. (1975) The search for bacterial cultures with herbicidal activity. Doklady Akademii Nauk Armyanskoi SSR 61,110–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolaib, M.O., Younes, M.F.W and Darwish, E.T.E. (1986) Hypolixus nubilosusas a factor in biological control of Amaranthusweeds in Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Science(Cairo), 31,767–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komen, J. (1992) Grains for the tropical regions. Biotechnology and Development Monitor 10,3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manojlovic, B. (1984) Effektivnost parazita u redukcijii populacije kukuruznog plamenca (Ostrinia nubilalisHbn., Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) na raznim biljkama hraniteljkama. Zastita Bilja 35, 333–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior, H. (1964) Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 2. Band. Berlin: Gebrüder Bornträger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G.L. and Rodriguez, M.M. (1990) Aislamiento, identification y patogenicidad de bacterias en quelite Amaranthus hybridusL. y su posibilidad en el control biologico. Revista Chapingo 15,66–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulka, J. and Chodova, D. (1988) Problematica rezistence plevelu vivu herbicidum. Agrochemica 28,207–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, A.S. and Weidemann, G.J. (1992) Evaluation of Aposphaeria amaranthias a potential bioherbicide for Amaranthus. In Biological Control of Weeds, Eighth International Symposium, p. 68.

  • Mintz, A.S., Heiny, D.K. and Weidemann, G.J. (1992) Factors influencing the biocontrol of tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus) with Aposphaeria amaranthi. Plant Disease 76, 267–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, T.A. and Doll, J.D. (1993) Integrating reduced herbicide use with mechanical weeding in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology 7,382–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napompeth, B. (1982) Biological research and development in Thailand. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Plant Protection Tropics, pp. 301–3.

  • Pearcy, R.W. and Ehleringer, J. (1984) Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environment 7,1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, C. (1996) Synergistic interactions between potential microbial herbicides and chemical herbicides. MSc Thesis, University of Bath.

  • Schroeder, D. and Müller-Schärer, H. (1995) Biological control of weeds and its prospectives in Europe. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent. 60,117–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, D., Müller-Schärer, H. and Stinson, C.S.A. (1993) A European weed survey in 10 major crop systems to identify targets for biological control. Weed Research 33,449–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuester, M. (1987) Blister beetle in Paraguay–a potential biological control agent. Tropical Pest Management 33,241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senesac, A. and Minotti, P.L. (1982) The ecology and distribution of pigweed species in New York State. Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society 36,94–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, A. (1995) Studies of Alternariasp.–a potential microbial herbicide for the annual weed Amaranthus. MSc thesis, University of Bath.

  • Sovljanski, B., Arsenovic, M., Klokocar-Smit, Z., Janjic, V. and Ostojic, Z. (1989) Herbicide-resistant weeds and search for biocontrol agents in Yugoslavia. Importance and perspectives on herbicide-resistant weeds. In R. Cavalloro and G. Noye (eds) Proceedings of a meeting of the EC Experts’ Group, pp. 153–60. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, K.A. and Havranek, D. (1989) A new species of Agromyzidae (Diptera) from Venezuela. Florida Entomologist 72,441–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallknecht, G.F. and Schulz-Schaeffer, J.R. (1993) Amaranth rediscovered. In J. Janick and J.E. Simon (eds) New crops, pp. 211–18. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmaier, C.E. (1950) Insects associated with the rough pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexusL. (Amaranthaceae). Unpublished thesis, Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science.

  • Tevis, L. (1958) Interrelations between the harvester ant Veromessor pergandei(Mayr) and some desert ephemerals. Ecology 39, 695–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisler, A.M. (1990) Feeding in the pigweed flea beetle. Disonycha glabrataFab. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), on Amaranthus retroflexus. Virginia Journal of Science 41,243–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin T.G., Burges, N.A., Chater, A.O., Edmondson, J.R., Heywood, V.H., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. and Webb, D.A. (1993) Flora Europaea. Vol. 1. Psilotaceae to Plantanaceae, pp. 130–2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, G.B. and Cordo, H.A. (1976) Recent South American field studies of prospective biocontrol agents of weeds. In Proceedings of the Res. Planning Conference on Aquatic Plant Control Program, Charleston, pp. 36–55.

  • Wapshere, A.J. (1974) Host specificity of phytophagous organisms and the evolutionary centres of plant genera and subgenera. Entomophaga 19,301–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, D.F. (1994) Biological Control of Weeds: Southeast Asian Prospects, pp. 18–24. Canberra: ACIAR Monograph No. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S.E. and McWilliams, E.L. (1980) The biology of Canadian weeds. 44. Amaranthus retroflexusL., A. powelliiS. Wats. and A. hybridusL. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 60,1215–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissmann, R.M. (1995) Variability of Alternaria, a potential mycoherbicide for Amaranthus. MSc thesis, University of Bath.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURKI , H., SCHROEDER , D., LAWRIE , J. et al. Biological control of pigweeds (Amaranthus retroflexus, L. A. Powellii, S. Watson and A. bouchonii Thell.) with phytophagous insects, fungal pathogens and crop management. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 2, 51–59 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018480429706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018480429706

Navigation