Skip to main content
Log in

Some size relationships in phytoflagellate motility

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from the literature are used to assess some hypothesised adaptive advantages of the flagellate life form among phytoplankton. Possible advantages include increased nutrient uptake by movement through a homogeneous medium as opposed to exploitation of spatial hetrogeneity of the environment. Maximal migrational amplitudes and maximal swimming velocities of phytoflagellates were compared to body size. Both were found to increase with size. Relative amplitudes and relative velocities, however, were found to decrease with size. Hydrophysical considerations show that additional gain of nutrients by swimming through a homogeneous medium is only minimal for small flagellates at their attainable swimming velocities. It is suggested that exploitation of environmental heterogeneity in nutrient distribution may be one of the most important advantages for flagellates over coccoid algae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg, H. C. & E. M. Purcell, 1977. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys. 120: 193–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, T. & W. Rodhe, 1971. Distribution and migration of Peridinium in Lake Kinneret. Mitt. int. Ver. Limnol. 19: 266–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasco,D., 1978. Observations of the diel migration of marine dinoflagellates of the Baja California coast. Mar. Biol. 46: 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frempong, E.,1984. A seasonal sequence of diel distribution patterns for the planktonic flagellate Ceratium hirundunella in an eutrophic lake. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 401–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavis, J., 1976. Munk and Riley revisted: nutrient diffusion transport and rates of phytoplankton growth. J. Mar. Res. 34: 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, J. C., 1984. Conceptual role for microaggregates in pelagic waters. Bull. Mar. Sci. 35: 462–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, J. C., J. J. McCarthy & D. G. Peavey, 1979. Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters. Nature 279: 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasle, G. R., 1950. Phototactic vertical migration in marine dinoflagellates. Oikos 2: 162–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmavirta, V.,1974. Diel periodicity in the phytoplankton community of the oligotrophic lake Pääjärvi, southern Finland. I. Phytoplanktonic primary production and related factors. Ann. bot. fenn. 11: 136–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. A., 1980. Phytoplankton growth and zooplankton grazing in oligotrophic oceans. Nature 284: 439–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilham, S. S.,1986. Dynamics of Lake Michigan natural phytoplankton communities in continuous cultures along a Si:P loading gradient. Can. J. Fish. Aqu. Sci. 43: 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knisely, K. & W. Geller, 1986. Selective feeding of four zooplankton species on natural lake phytoplankton. Oecologia 96: 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, J. W. G., 1963. A rarely recorded but very common British alga. Rhodomonas minuta Skuja. Brit. Phycol. Bull. 2: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R.,1978. Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment. Oceanol. Acta 1: 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munk, W. H. & G. A. Riley, 1952. Absorption of nutrients by aquatic plants. J. Mar. Res. 11: 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauwerck, A., 1963. Die Beziehungen zwischen Zooplankton and Phytoplankton im See Erken. Symb. Bot. Uppsal. 17: 1–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. H., 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge Univ. Press. 329 pp.

  • Purcell, E. M., 1977.Life at low Reynolds numbers. Amer. J. Phys. 45: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. A. & K. Richardson, 1984. Dinophyte flagella: a costbenefit analysis. New Phytol. 98: 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen,K., R. I. Jones & L. Arvola, 1984. Hypolimnetic phosphorus retrieval by diet vertical migrations of lake phytoplankton. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, T H., P. L. Herrgesell & A. W. Knight, 1974.Density dependent vertical migration in the freshwater dinoflagellate Peridinium penardii. J. Phycol. 10: 475–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoblad, R. D., I. Chet & R. Mitchell, 1978.Quantitative assay for algal chemotaxis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 36: 847–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E. & J. Kalff, 1983. Competition for phosphorus among co-occurring freshwater phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 448–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeder, C. J., 1967. Tagesperiodische Wanderungen bei begeisselten Planktonalgen. Umschau 1967: 338

  • Sommer, U., 1982. Vertical niche separation between two closely related planktonic flagellate species (Rhodomonas lens and Rhodomonas minuta v. nannoplanctica). J. Plankton Res. 4: 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, U., 1983.Nutrient competition between phytoplankton species in multispecies chemostat experiments. Arch. Hydrobiol. 96: 399–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, U. & Z. M. Gliwicz, 1986. Long range vertical migration of Volvox in tropical Lake Cahora Bassa (Mozambique). Limnol.

  • Sournia, A., 1982. Form and function in marine phytoplankton. Biol. Rev. 57: 347–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throndsen,J., 1973. Motility in some marine nanoplankton flagellates. Norw. J. Zool. 21: 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilzer, M. M.,1973.Diurnal periodicity in the phytoplankton assemblage of a high mountain lake.Limnol. Oceanogr. 18: 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sommer, U. Some size relationships in phytoflagellate motility. Hydrobiologia 161, 125–131 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044105

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044105

Key words

Navigation