Skip to main content
Log in

Inhibition of ethylene responses by 1-Methylcyclopropene and 3-Methylcyclopropene

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3-Methylcyclopropene (3-MCP) binds to the ethylene receptor and blocks it for several days, but concentrationswise is less effective than 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP). In diverse ethylene-responsive systems, including ripening of mature-green bananas (Musa sapientum L.), inhibition of growth in etiolated pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings, abscission of orange (Citrus sinensis L.) leaf explants and mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) leaves, and wilting of campanula (Campanula carpatica) and kalanchoe (Kalanchoë blossfeldiana) florets, full inhibition of the ethylene response required higher concentrations of 3-MCP. Depending on the experimental system, the effective concentration of 3-MCP was from 5 to 10 times higher than that required for 1-MCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burg SP and Burg EA (1967) Molecular requirements for the biological activity of ethylene. Plant Physiol 42: 144–152

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dupille E and Sisler EC (1995) Effect of an ethylene receptor antagonist on carnations and other plant material. In: Ait-Oaubahou A, and El-Otmani M (eds) Postharvest Physiology, Pathology, and Technologies for Horticultural Commodities: Recent Advances, pp 294–301. Institut Agronomique et Veterinare Hassan II, Agadir, Morocco

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dupille E and Zacarias L (1996) Extraction and biochemical characterization of wound-induced ACC oxidase from Citrus peel. Plant Science 114: 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koster R, Arora S and Binger P (1970) 3-Methylcyclopropene from 1-chloro-2-butenes. Angew Chem Internat Edit 8: 810–811

    Google Scholar 

  6. Magid RM, Clarke TC and Duncan CD (1971) An efficient and convenient synthesis of 1-methylcyclopropene. J Org Chem 36: 1320–1321

    Google Scholar 

  7. Serek M, Sisler EC and Reid MS (1994) Novel gaseous ethylene binding inhibitor prevents ethylene effects in potted flowering plants. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 119(6): 1230–1233

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sisler EC and Pian A (1973) Effect of ethylene and cyclic olefins on tobacco leaves. Tob Sci 17: 68–72

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sisler EC (1991) Ethylene binding components in plants. In: Mattoo AK and Suttle JC (eds) The Plant Hormone Ethylene, pp 81–99. CRC Press

  10. Sisler EC, Dupille E and Serek M (1996a) Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene, and methylenecyclopropane on ethylene binding and ethylene action on cut carnations. Plant Growth Regul 18: 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sisler EC, Serek M and Dupille E (1996b) Comparison of cyclopropene, 1-methylcyclopropene and 3,3-dimethylcyclopropene as an ethylene antagonist in plants. Plant Growth Regul 18: 169–174

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sisler EC and Serek M (1997) Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor level: Recent developments. Physiol Plant 100: 577–582

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zacarias L, Tadeo FR, Bono R and Primo-Millo E (1993) Abscission studies in a new mutant of navel oranges. In: Pech JC, Latche A and Balague C (eds) Cellular and Molecular Aspects of the Plant Hormone Ethylene, pp 284–290. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sisler, E.C., Serek, M., Dupille, E. et al. Inhibition of ethylene responses by 1-Methylcyclopropene and 3-Methylcyclopropene. Plant Growth Regulation 27, 105–111 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006153016409

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006153016409

Navigation