Abstract
Length and breadth of eggs were measured in ringed populations of the Great Tit. During a part of the study volume and weight were also measured, but this did not give additional information, viz. variation in specific weight of fresh eggs and deviations from calculated volume were within the limits of precision. Only in small eggs are length and breadth positively correlated.
In two populations, a major part (60–80%) of the variation in the clutch means of egg length, egg breadth, shape index and egg volume is only found between clutches of different females. The absence of correlation between different female partners of one male and the similarity of female repeatability to heritability estimates based on daughter-mother regression lead to the conclusion that 60–80% of the variation in egg dimensions is genetic.
The implications for a potential rapid response to selection resulting in a micro-evolutionary change are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ankney, C. D.. 1980. Egg weight, survival and growth of lesser snow goose goslings. J. Wildl. Mgmt 44: 174–182.
Baker, C. M. A., 1960. The genetic basis of egg quality: a review of the literature. Br. Poult. Sci. 1: 3–16.
Baten, W. D. & Henderson, E. W., 1941. Relations of weights and volumes of eggs to measurements of long and short axes. Poult. Sci. 20: 556–564.
Barth, E. K., 1953. Calculation of egg-volume on loss of weight during incubation. Auk 70: 152–159.
Barth, E. K., 1967. Egg dimensions and laying dates of Larus marinus, L. argentatus, L. fuscus, and L. canus. Nytt. Mag. Zool. 15: 5–34.
Bryant, D. M., 1975. Breeding biology of house martins Delichon urbica in relation to aerial insect abundance. Ibis 117: 180–216.
Bryant, D. M., 1978. Environmental influences on growth and survival of nestling house martins Delichon urbica. Ibis 120: 271–283.
Dhondt, A. A., 1970. De regulatie der santallen in Gentse koolmeespopulaties (Parus major L.). Thesis, Ghent.
Dunn, E. H., Hussell, D. J. T., & Ricklefs, R. E., 1979. The determination of incubation stage in starling eggs. Bird-Banding 50: 114–120.
Falconer, D. S., 1960. Introduction to quantitative genetics Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh & London.
Festing, M. F. & Nordskog, A. W., 1967. Response to selection for body weight and egg weight in chickens. Genetics 55: 219–231.
Gochfeld, M. 1977. Intraclutch egg variation: The uniqueness of the common tern's third egg. Bird-Banding 48: 325–332.
Hoyt, D. F., 1976. The effect of shape on the surface-volume relationships of birds eggs. Condor 78: 343–349.
Jaffé, W. P., 1966. Egg production, body weight and egg quality characters; their heritability and the correlations between them. Br. Poult. Sci 7: 91–98.
Jones, P. J., 1973. Some aspects of the feeding ecology of the great tit Parus major L. Ph. D. thesis, Oxford.
Kendeigh, S. C., 1975. Effect of parentage on egg characteristics. Auk 92: 163–164.
Kendeigh, S. C., Kramer, T. C. & Hamerstrom, P., 1956. Variation in egg characteristics of the house wren. Auk 73: 42–65.
Kluyver, H. N., 1951. The population ecology of the great tit, Parus major L. Ardea 39: 1–135.
Kluyver, H. N., 1971. Regulation of numbers in populations of great tits (Parus major) pp. 507–523 in: Dynamics of populations. P. J. den Boer & G. R. Gradwell (eds.) Pudoc Wageningen.
Kluyver, H. N., Van Balen, J. H., & Cavé, A. J., 1977. The occurrence of time-saving mechanisms in the breeding biology of the great tit, Parus major. pp. 153–169 in: Evolutionary Ecology, B. Stonehouse and C. Perrins (eds.), MacMillan Press, London and Basingstoke.
Koskimies, J., 1957. Variations in size and shape of eggs of the velvet scoter, Melanitta fusca. Archs Soc. Vanamo 12: 58–69.
Lack, D., 1966. Population studies of birds. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Lack, D., 1968. Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, London.
Langvatn, R., 1972. Field measurements of the volume of small mammal organs. Oikos 23: 142–144.
Lewontin, R. C., 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia, New York & London.
Manning, T. H., 1978. Measurements and weights of eggs of the Canada goose, Branta canadensis, analyzed and compared with those of other species. Can. J. Zool. 56: 676–687.
Marks, H. L., 1978. Possible relationships between packed sperm volume and egg mass in domestic fowl. Experientia 34: 443–444.
Myhrberget, S., 1977. Size and shape of eggs of willow grouse Lagopus lagopus. Orn. Scand. 8: 39–46.
Nice, M. M., 1937. Studies in the life history of the song sparrow, vol. I. Trans. Linn. Soc. N-Y 4: 1–247.
Ojanen, M., Orell & Välsänen, R. A., 1979, Role of heredity in egg size variation in the great tit Parus major and the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Orn. Scand. 10: 22–28.
Perrins, C. M., 1979. British tits. Collins, London.
Ricklefs, R. E., Hahn, D. C., & Montevecchi, W. A., 1978. The relationship between egg size and chick size in the laughing gull and Japanese quail. Auk 95: 135–144.
Romanoff, A. L. & Romanoff, A. J., 1949. The avian egg. Wiley & Sons. New York.
Schifferli, L., 1973. The effect of egg weight on the subsequent growth of nestling great tits Parus major. Ibis 115: 549–558.
Stonehouse, B., 1966. Egg volumes from linear dimensions. Emu 65: 227–228.
Svensson, B. W., 1978. Clutch dimensions and aspects of the breeding strategy of the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs in northern Europe: a study based on egg collections. Orn. Scand. 9: 66–83.
Väisänen, R. A., 1969. Evolution of the ringed plover (Charadrius hiaticula L.) during the last hundred years in Europe. Ann. Acad. sci. fenn. series A. IV. biologica 149: 1–90.
Väisänen, R. A., 1974. Timing of waterfowl breeding on the Krunnit Islands, Gulf of Bothnia. Ornis fenn. 51: 61–84.
Väisänen, R. A., 1977. Geographic variation in timing of breeding in size in eight European species of waders. Ann. zool. fenn. 14: 1–25.
Väisänen, R. A., Hilden, O., Soikkeli, M., & Vuolanto, S., 1972. Egg dimension variation in five wader species: the role of heredity. Ornis fenn. 49: 25–44.
Van Balen, J. H., 1973. A comparative study of the breeding ecology of the great tit Parus major in different habitats. Ardea 61: 1–93.
Van Noordwijk, A. J., Van Balen, J. H. & Scharloo, W., 1980. Heritability of ecologically important traits in the great tit. Ardea 68: 193–203.
Van Noordwijk, A. J., Van Balen, J. H. & Scharloo, W., 1981a. Genetic and environmental variation in clutch size of the great tit. Neth. J. Zool., in press.
Van Noordwijk, A. J., Van Balen, J. H., & Scharloo, W., 1981b. Genetic variation in the timing of reproduction in the great tit. Oecologia, in press.
Van Noordwijk, A. J. & Scharloo, W., 1981. Inbreeding in an island population of the great tit. Evolution, in press.
Webber, M. I., 1975. Some aspects of the non-breeding population dynamics of the great tit (Parus major). Thesis, Univ. Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Noordwijk, A.J., Keizer, L.C.P., Van Balen, J.H. et al. Genetic variation in egg dimensions in natural populations of the Great Tit. Genetica 55, 221–232 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127206
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127206