Skip to main content
Log in

Size and shape heritability in natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata: temporal and microgeographical variation

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

‘Traditional morphometrics’ allows us to decompose morphological variation into its major independent sources, identifying them usually as size and shape. To compare and investigate the properties of size and shape in natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata, estimating their heritabilities and analysing their temporal and microgeographic changes, we carried out collections on seven occasions in Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, Brazil. In one of these collections, we took samples from five different altitudes. Measurements were taken from wild caught inseminated females and up to three of their laboratory‐reared daughters. Through a principal component analysis, three major sources of variation were identified as due to size (the first one) and shape (the remaining two). The overall amount of variation among laboratory flies was about half of that observed among wild flies and this reduction was primarily due to size. Shape variation was about the same under natural and artificial conditions. A genetic altitudinal cline was detected for size and shape, although altitude explained only a small part of their variation. Differences among collections were detected both for size and shape in wild and laboratory flies, but no simple pattern emerged. Shape variation had high heritability in nature, close to or above 40% and did not vary significantly temporally. Although on the overall size heritability (18 ± 6%)was significant its estimates were not consistent along months – they were non‐significant in all but one month, when it reached a value of 51 ± 11%. Overall, this suggests that size and shape have different genetic properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bitner-Mathé, B.C., A.A. Peixoto & L.B. Klaczko, 1995. Morphological variation in a natural population of Drosophila mediopunctata: altitudinal cline, temporal changes and influence of chromosome inversions. Heredity 75: 54–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F.L., B. Chernoff, R.L. Eldler, J.M. Humphries, G.R. Smith & R.E. Strauss, 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud, J.M., 1982. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36: 499–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud, J.M., 1995. Morphological integration in saddle-back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium. Am. Nat. 145: 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A. & E. Beecham, 1987. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 117: 727–737.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David, J., B. Moreteau, J. Gauthier, G. Pétavy, A. Stockel & A. Imasheva, 1994. Reaction norms of size characters in relation to growth temperature in Drosophila melanogaster: An isofemale lines analysis.Genet. Sel. Evol. 26: 229–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1977. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert, P., B. Moreteau, J.C. Moreteau & J.R. David, 1998. Genetic variability of quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) natural populations: Analysis of wild-living flies and of several laboratory generations. Heredity 80: 326–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, J.H. & M. Turelli, 1989. Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 121: 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imasheva, A.G., O.A. Bubli & O.E. Lazebny, 1994. Variation in wing length in Eurasian natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 72: 508–514.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imasheva, A.G., O.A. Bubli, O.E. Lazebny & L.A. Zhivotovsky, 1995. Geographic differentiation in wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 96: 303–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, M.J. & H.S. Pooni, 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R., 1987. Appendix in: Coyne, J.A. & E. Beecham, 1987. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 117: 727–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P., 1992. The Making of a Fly: The Genetics of Animal Design. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, A., M. Santos & A. Fontdevila, 1995. Heritability and selection on body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 141: 181–189.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lofsvold, D., 1986. Quantitative genetics of morphological differentiation in Peromyscus: I. Test of homogeneity of genetic covariance structure among species and subspecies. Evolution 40: 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, L.F., 1990. Traditional morphometrics, pp 77–122 in: Proc. Michigan Morphometric Workshop, edited by F.J. Rohlf and F.L. Bookstein. Special Publication Number 2. The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Harvard, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, S.J. & C.T. Schick, 1991. Constancy of population parameters of life-history and floral trait in Raphanus sativus L: II. Effects of planting density on phenotype and heritability estimates. Evolution 45: 1888–1907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E.C. & R.A. Miller, 1958. Morphological Integration. University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., A. Hoffmann & J.S. Jones, 1987. Male size and mating success of Drosophila melanogaster and D. Pseudoobscura under field conditions. Anim. Behav. 35: 468–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzoli, M.C., D. Guerra, G. Giorgi, F. Garoia & S. Cavicchi, 1997. Developmental constraints and wing shape variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 79: 572–577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfriem, P., 1983. Latitudinal variation in wing size in Drosophila subobscura and its dependence on polygenes of chromosome 0. Genetica 61: 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevosti, A., 1955. Geographical variability in quantitative traits in populations of Drosophila subobscura. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol. XX: 294–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T., 1958. A possible difference in genetic variance between wild and laboratory populations. DIS 32: 148–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T. & J.S.F. Barker, 1989. Ecological aspects of the heritability of body size in Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 123: 803–813.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riska, B., T. Prout & M. Turelli, 1989. Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics 123: 865–871.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F.W., 1987. Variation of body size within and between wild populations of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetica 72: 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D.A. & T.A. Mousseau, 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: Lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58: 103–118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, A., M. Santos, A. Barbadilla, J. E. Quezada-Díaz, E. Hasson & A. Fontdevila, 1991. Genetic variance for body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 128: 739–750.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M., A. Ruiz, A. Barbadilla, J.E. Quezada-Díaz, E. Hasson & A. Fontdevila, 1988. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii: XIV. Larger flies mate more often in nature. Heredity 61: 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M., A. Ruiz, J.E. Quezada-Díaz, A. Barbadilla & A. Fontdevila, 1992. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XX. Positive phenotypic covariance between field adult fitness components and body size. J. Evol. Biol. 5: 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, H.D. & H.L. Carson, 1947. Morphological variation in natural populations of Drosophila robusta Sturtevant. Evolution 1: 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.N., Jr. & R.C. Woodruff, 1982. Polygenic analysis of pattern formation: Interdependence among veins in the same compartment of the Drosophila wing. Genetica 60: 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R.H. & J.S.F. Barker, 1993. Quantitative genetic analysis ofbody size of Drosophila buzzatii. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 598–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigensberg, I. & D.A. Roff, 1996. Natural heritabilities: Can they be reliably estimated in the laboratory? Evolution 50: 2149–2157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.J., M.L. Stanton, N.C. Ellstrand & J.M. Clegg, 1994. Temporal and spatial variation in heritability and genetic correlations among floral traits in Raphanus sativus (wild radish). Heredity 73: 298–308.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bitner‐Mathé, B.C., Klaczko, L.B. Size and shape heritability in natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata: temporal and microgeographical variation. Genetica 105, 35–42 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003591726851

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003591726851

Navigation