Abstract
This paper presents a comparison of numerical simulations to the measured response of capillary barrier field tests. The simulations were of pilot-scale tests of four 7 m long, 1.2 m thick capillary barriers, two with 5% slopes and two with 10% slopes, with and without an included unsaturated drainage layers. The unsaturated drainage layer was included to encourage lateral drainage. The 5% sloped barriers were subjected to a period of constant infiltration for a period of 74 days, while the 10% system with the drainage layer had water added for 26 days and the conventional capillary barrier with a 10% slope was subjected to 43 days of infiltration. The numerical modelling was conducted using both drying and wetting soil moisture characteristic curves to determine their influence on the results. Differences between the field test and the model data were found, but in general the simulations appeared to adequately reproduce the response of the test systems. It was found that the use of wetting curve data provided a better fit to the field data, more accurately predicting the amount and timing of the percolate produced. © Rapid Science Ltd. 1998
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dwyer, S.F. (1997) Cost comparisons of alternative landfill final covers. Proceedings, 1997 International Containment Technology Conference, 9-12 February, 1997, St. Petersburg, FL, pp. 400-406.
Hakonson, T.E., Maines, K.L., et al. (1994) Hydrologic evaluation of four landfill cover designs at Hill Air Force Base, Utah. Los Alamos, NM, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Morris, C.E. and Stormont, J.C. (1997) Capillary barriers and subtitle D covers: estimating equivalency. Journa! of Environmenta! Engineering, 123(1), 3-10.
Oldenburg, C.M. and Pruess, K. (1993) On umerical Modeling of capillary barriers. Water Resources Research, 29, 1045–1056.
Reed, J.E. (1989) Some preliminary model studies of capiIlary barriers, US Geological Circular 1036, 61-72.
Schroeder, P.R., Aziz, N.M., Lloyd, C.M. and Zappi, P.A. (1994a) The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: User's Guide for version 3. EPA/600/9-94/xxx, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.
Schroeder, P.R., Aziz, N.M., Lloyd, C.M. and Zappi, P.A. (1994b) The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering Documentation for version 3.EPA/ 600/9-94/xxx, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.
Stormont, J.C. (1996) The effectiveness of two capillary barriers on a 10% slope. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 14, 243-267.
Stormont, J.C. (1995a) The performance of two capillary barriers during constant filtration. In Landfill Closures... Environmental Protection and Land Recovery (edited by R.J. Dunn and U.P. Singh). New York, American Society of Civil Engineers, Special Publication 53, pp. 77-92.
Stormont, J.C. (1995b) The effect of constant anisotropy on capillary barrier performances. Water Resources Research, 31, 783-785.
Stormont, J.C. and Morris, C.E. (1997) Unsaturated drainage layers for the diversion of infiltrating water, ASCE Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 123, 364-366.
Travis, B.J. and Birdsell, K.H. (1991) TRACR3D: a model of flow and transport in porous media. Los Alamos National Laboratories LA-11798-M (UC-814), Los Alamos, NM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morris, C.E., Stormont, J.C. Evaluation of numerical simulations of capillary barrier field tests. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 16, 201–213 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008853710339
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008853710339