Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The evolution of tolerance to damage in Gentianella campestris: natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the framework of phenotypic plasticity, tolerance to browsing can be operationally defined as a norm of reaction comparing plant performance in undamaged and damaged conditions. Genetic variation in tolerance is then indicated by heterogeneity in the slopes of norms of reaction from a population. We investigated field gentian (Gentianella campestris) tolerance to damage in the framework of phenotypic plasticity using a sample of maternal lines from natural populations grown under common garden conditions and randomly split into either a control or an artificial clipping treatment. We found a diversity of tolerance norms of reaction at both the population and family level: the impacts of clipping ranged from poor tolerance (negative slope) to overcompensation (positive slope). We detected heterogeneity in tolerance norms of reaction in four populations. Similarly, we found a variety of plastic architectural responses to clipping and genetic variation in these responses in several populations. Overall, we found that the most tolerant populations were late flowering and also exhibit the greatest plastic increases in node (meristem) production in response to damage. We studied damage-imposed natural selection on plasticity in plant architecture in 10 of the sampled populations. In general, there was strong positive direct selection on final number of nodes for both control and clipped plants. However, the total selection on nodes (direct + indirect selection) within each treatment category depended heavily on the frequency of damage and cross-treatment genetic correlations in node production. In some cases, strong correlated responses to selection across the damage treatment led to total selection against nodes in the more rare environment. This could ultimately lead to the evolution of maladaptive phenotypes in one or both of the treatment categories. These results suggest that tolerance and a variety of architectural responses to damage may evolve by both direct and indirect responses to natural selection. While the present study demonstrates the potential importance of cross-treatment genetic correlations in directing the evolution of tolerance traits, such as branch or node production, we did not find any strong evidence of genetic trade-offs in candidate tolerance traits between undamaged and damaged conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, W.G and Weis, A.E. (1997) Evolutionary ecology across three trophic levels: goldenrods, gallmakers, and natural enemies. Monographs in Population Biology 29. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2000) Overcompensation of plants in response to herbivory and the by-product benefits of mutualism. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 309-313.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S.A. (1992) Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140, S85-S107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böcher, T.W. (1963) The study of ecotypical variation in relation to experimental morphology. In V.H. Heywood, A. Love, (eds) Regnum Vegetabile. 27. Symposium on biosystematics, Kemink and Zoon, Utrecht, pp. 10-16.

  • Brodie, E.D. (1992) Correlational selection for color pattern and antipredator behavior in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Evolution 46, 1284-1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M.J. (1987) Benevolent herbivores? Trends in Ecol. Evol. 2, 167-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. (1952) The problem of the environment and selection. Am. Nat. 86, 293-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. (1990) Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet. Res. 56, 57-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th edn. Longman Group, Essex, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineblum, W.L. (1991) Genetic constraints on the evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivory in the morning glory, Ph.D. Thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineblum, W.L. and Rausher, M.D. (1995) Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 337, 517-520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J.D. (1992) The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological interpretation of the parameters. Evolution 46, 540-550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geber, M.A. (1990) The cost of meristem limitation in Polygonum arenastrum: negative genetic correlations between fecundity and growth. Evolution 44, 799-819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukioja, E. (1991) The influence of grazing on the evolution, morphology, and physiology of plants as modular organisms. Phil. Trans. R. Society of Lond. B. 333, 241-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, R.R. (1985) The Analysis of Linear Models. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järemo, J., Tuomi, J, Nilsson, P. and Lennartsson, T. (1999) Plant adaptation to herbivory: mutualistic versus antagonistic coevolution. Oikos 84, 313-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juenger, T. and Bergelson, J. (1997) Pollen and resource limitation of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 78, 1684-1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juenger, T. and Bergelson, J. (2000) The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54, 79-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban, R. and Meyers, J.H. (1989) Induced plant responses to herbivory. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 331-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban, R. and Baldwin, I.T. (1997) Induced Responses to Herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1999) Response to selection in partially self-fertilizing populations. I. Selection on a single trait. Evolution 53, 336-349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennartsson, T. and Svenson, R. (1996) Patterns in the decline of three species of Gentianella (Gentianaceae) in Sweden, illustrating the deterioration of seminatural grasslands. Symbolae Botanicae Upsaliensis 31 170-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennartsson, T. (1997) Demography, reproductive biology and adaptive traits in Gentianella campestris and G. amarella; evaluating grassland management for conservation by using indicator plant species, Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennartsson, T., Tuomi, J., and Nilsson, P. (1997). Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris. Am. Nat. 149, 1147-1155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lennartsson, T., Nilsson, P. and Tuomi J. (1998). Induction of overcompensation in the field gentian, Gentianella campestris. Ecology 79, 1061-1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.C. (1975). Path Analysis — a Primer. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littel, R., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. and Wolfinger, R.D. (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. (1997) Genetics and the Analysis of Quantitative Characters. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J.N.A. (1994) The benefits of overcompensation and herbivory: the difference in coping with herbivores and liking them. Am. Nat. 144, 528-533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio, R. and Mojonnier, L.E. (1997) Reducing bias in the measurement of natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 433-436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio, R., Rausher M.D. and Burdick, D.S. (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mututally exclusive. Ecology 78, 1301-1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murbeck, S. (1892) Studien über Gentian aus der Gruppe Endotricha Froel. Acta Hortiberg 2(3).

  • Nilsson, P., Tuomi, J. and Ånström, M. (1996) Bud dormancy as a bet-hedging strategy. Am. Nat. 147, 269-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K.N. and Whitham, T.G. (1987) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am. Nat. 143, 739-749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K.N. (1992) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory — from mutualistic to antagonistic interactions. Ecology 73, 2076-2095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippi, T. and Seger, J. (1989) Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 41-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausher, M.D. (1992) The measurement of natural selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariance between traits and fitness. Evolution 46: 616-626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J.P. and Kotanen, P. (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 145-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. (1997) SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements Through Release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, S.M. and Callahan, H.S. (1999) Measuring natural selection on phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 53, 1704-1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, I.I. (1949) Factors of Evolution: The Theory of Stabilizing Selection. Blakiston, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seger, J. and Brockman, J. (1987) What is bet-hedging? Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 4, 182-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, A.M. and Johnston, M.O. (1999) The cost of compensation. Am. Nat. 153, 683-687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms, E.L. and Triplett, J. (1994) Costs and benefits of plant response to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48, 1973-1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, K., Marquis, R.J., Hochwender, C.G. and Simms, E.L. (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 565-595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S.Y. and Agrawal, A.A. (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 179-185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin, P. (2000) Mechanisms of tolerance to herbivore damage: what do we know? Evol. Ecol. 14, 523-536 (this issue).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, J., Nillson, P. and Åström, M. (1994) Plant compensatory responses: bud dormancy as an adaptation to herbivory. Ecology 75, 1429-1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vail, S.G. (1992) Selection for overcompensatory responses to herbivory: a mechanism of the evolution of plant-herbivore mutualism. Am. Nat. 139, 1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. and Lande, R. (1985) Genotype-by-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39, 505-522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. (1987) Genetic constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. In V. Loeschke (ed.) Genetic Constraints on Adaptive Evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 47-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, A. and Gorman, W.L. (1990) Measuring canalizing selection on reaction norms: an exploration of the Eurosta-Solidago system. Evolution 44, 820-831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, A. (1992) Plant variation and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in herbivore performance. In R.S. Fritz and E.L. Simms (eds.) Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 140-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. (1997) Measures of phenotypic selection are biased by partial inbreeding. Evolution 50, 1501-1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Thomas Juenger

  2. Department of Conservation Biology, Swedish Agricultural University, Uppsala, Sweden;

    Tommy Lennartsson

  3. Department of Biology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Juha Tuomi

Authors
  1. Thomas Juenger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tommy Lennartsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juha Tuomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juenger, T., Lennartsson, T. & Tuomi, J. The evolution of tolerance to damage in Gentianella campestris: natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolutionary Ecology 14, 393–419 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010908800609

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010908800609

Search

Navigation