Skip to main content
Log in

Genotype by environment effects and selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. II. Three-mode pattern analysis

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A selection program in three tropical maize populations aimed to improve tolerance of mid-season to late season drought environments while maintaining grain yield (GY) potential. The selection process employed other attributes that included maintaining a constant anthesis date (AD) and, under drought, shortening the anthesis-silking interval (ASI) and increasing ear number per plant (EPP). Three-mode (genotypes × environments × attributes) pattern analysis, which consists of clustering and ordination, should be able to collectively interpret these changes from ten evaluation trials. Mixture maximum likelihood clustering identified four groups that indicated the populations' performance had changed with selection. Groups containing the advanced cycles of selection were higher yielding in most environments and had lower ASI and higher EPP, particularly in drought environments. Check entries with no selection for drought tolerance remained grouped with the initial cycles of selection. A 3 × 2 × 3 (genotypes by environments by attributes) principal component model explained 70% of the variation. For the first environmental component, ASI was shown to be highly negatively correlated with both GY and EPP while anthesis date (AD) was virtually uncorrelated with other traits. The second environmental component (explaining 10% of the variation) contrasted droughted and well-watered environments and showed that EPP and GY were better indicators of this contrast (in terms of changes in population performance) than were AD or ASI. Three-mode analysis demonstrated that improvements with selection occurred in both droughted and well-watered environments and clearly summarised the overall success of the breeding program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basford, K.E. & G.J. Mclachlan, 1985. The mixture method of clustering applied to three-way data. J. of Classification 2: 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basford, K.E., P.M. Kroonenberg, I.H. DeLacy & P.K. Lawrence, 1990. Multiattribute evaluation of regional cotton variety trials. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 79: 225–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basford, K.E., P.M. Kroonenberg & I.H. DeLacy, 1991. Three-way methods for multiattribute genotype × environment data: an illustrated partial survey. Field Crop Res. 27: 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basford, K.E., D.R. Greenway & G.J. McLachlan, 1994. Standard errors of fitted component means of normal mixture models. Centre for Statistics Research Report No. 27. Department of Mathematics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basford, K.E. & J.W. Tukey, 1997. Graphical profiles as an aid to understanding plant breeding experiments. J. of Statistical Inference and Planning (in press).

  • Byth, D.E., R.L. Eisemann & I.H. DeLacy, 1976. Two-way pattern analysis of a large data set to evaluate genotypic adaptation. Heredity 37: 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolaños, J. & G.O. Edmeades, 1993. Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization. Field Crops Res. 31: 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S.C., J. Crossa & G.O. Edmeades, 1996. Genotype by environment effects and selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. I. Two mode pattern analysis of yield. Euphytica 95: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. & I.H. de Lacy, 1994. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 88: 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P., N.M. Laird & D.B. Rubin, 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 39: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades, G.O., J. Bolaños & H.R. Lafitte 1992. Progress in breeding for drought tolerance in maize. In D. Wilkinson (Ed.) ‘Proceedings of the 47th Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference’, Chicago, 1992. American Seed Trade Association, Chicago. pp. 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades, G.O., J. Bolaños, M. Hernández & S. Bello, 1993. Causes for silk delay in a lowland tropical maize population. Crop Sci. 33: 1029–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades, G.O., S.C. Chapman, J. Bolaños, M. Bänziger & H.R. Lafitte, 1995. Recent evaluations of progress in selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Proceedings of the 4th Eastern and Southern African Regional Maize Conference, 28 Mar.–1 Apr. 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe. CIMMYT, Harare, pp. 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, P.N. & A.A. Rosielle, 1982. Reducing the influence of environmental main-effects on pattern analysis of plant breeding environments. Euphytica 31: 645–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K.R., 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroonenberg, P.M. & J. De Leeuw, 1980. Principal components analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika 45: 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroonenberg, P.M., 1983. Three-mode principal component analysis. Theory and application. DSWO Press, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroonenberg, P.M., 1988. Three-mode analysis. In: S. Kotz and N.L. Johnson (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Statistics Science, Vol. 9, pp. 231–236. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroonenberg, P.M., 1994. The TUCKLAS line: A suite of programs for three-way analysis. Computat. Stat. and Data Analysis 18: 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroonenberg, P.M. & K.E. Basford, 1989. An investigation of multi-attribute genotype response across environment using three-mode principal component analysis. Euphytica 44: 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G.J. & K.E. Basford, 1988. Mixture models: Inference and applications to clustering. Marcel Dekker, New York, 253 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungomery, V.E., R. Shorter, & D.E. Byth, 1974. Genotype × environment interactions and environmental adaptation. I. Pattern analysis — application to soybean populations. Aust. J. of Agric. Res. 25: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson H.D. & E.R. Williams, 1976. A new class of resovable incomplete block design. Biometrika 63: 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, S.C., Crossa, J., Basford, K.E. et al. Genotype by environment effects and selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. II. Three-mode pattern analysis. Euphytica 95, 11–20 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002922527795

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002922527795

Navigation