Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement in selfed and random-mated generations of four subtropical maize populations through S3 recurrent selection

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In maize (Zea mays L.) source germplasm having tolerance to inbreeding is needed for the derivation of productive inbred lines. The germplasm with non-temperature adaptation, generally suffer from large inbreeding depression (ID). the objective of the present study was to improve four white subtropical populations for tolerance to ID through S3 recurrent selection. Two cycles of selection were conducted and the effect of selection was evaluated in the first selfed (S1) and random0mated (Synthetic-2=Syn-2) generations. To complete each cycle. 200 to 250 S3 progenies were evaluated and 15 to 20 superior ones selected for recombination in each population. Selection was practiced for high grain yield, vigour and other agronomie traits. The S1 and Syn-2 generations of the original (C0) and improved (C1, C2) populations were evaluated in a split-split plot design, with populations in main plots, generations in subplots and cycles in sub-subplots. In all populations, S1 and Syn-2 generations of C2 were significantly higher yielding than the C0 and the linear gain per cycle varied from 16.3 to 28.8% in S1 generation and 5.5 to 10.7% in Syn-2 generation. Selection reduced the anthesis-silking interval but slightly increased plant height, grain moisture and days to silk. An increase in plant height was expected because of emphasis on vigour during selection. For grain yield. ID decreased from 48.4% in C0 populations to 37.9% in C2, indicating an improved tolerance to inbreeding. Further, the selection accumulated favourable alleles; and Pop. 42 seemed to be the best source populations for deriving high yielding inbred lines. It may be concluded that S3 recurrent selection was effective in improving grain yield and the improved populations would provide better germplasm sources for the derivation of productive inbred lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AS1:

anthesis-silking interval

C:

cycle of selection

d:

dominance effect

Gc:

genetic gain due to one cycle of selection

ID:

inbreeding depression

μ+a :

mean of random inbred lines derived from the population

S:

selfed (generation)

SP:

selfed progeny (selection)

Syn-2:

synthetic-2 (generation)

References

  • Burgess, J.C. & D.R. West, 1993. Selection for grain yield following selection for ear height in maize. Crop Sci. 33:679–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, M.L. & Z.W. Wicks III. 1993. Response of a maize synthetic to S1 recurrent selection for grain yield in a disease-stress environment. Maydica 38: 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, T.M. & L.W. Kannenberg, 1979. Relative efficiencies of population improvement methods in corn: A simulation study. Crop Sci. 19: 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIMMYT, 1982. CIMMYT's Maize Program: An Overview. Mexico, D.F.

  • CIMMYT, 1987. CIMMYT Report on Maize Improvement 1982–83. Mexico, D.F.

  • CIMMYT, 1992. Enduring Design for Change: An Account of CIMMYT's Research. Its Impact. and Its Future Directions. Mexico. D.F.

  • CIMMYT, 1993. CIMMYT in 1992. Poverty, the Environment, and Population Growth: The Way Forward Mexico. D.F.

  • Cochran, W.G. & G.M. Cox, 1960. Experimental Designs. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R.E. 1964. Selection procedures in corn improvement. Proc. 19th Hyb. Corn Ind.-Res. Conf. 19:87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leon, C., G. Granados, R.N. Wedderburn & S. Pandey. 1993. Simultaneous improvement of downy mildew resistance and agronomic traits in tropical maize. Crop Sci. 33: 100–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C.O. & S.A. Eberhart, 1966. Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22: 439–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi, I.O. & R. Vencovsky, 1980. Depressao por endogamia em populacoes de milho. XIII Reuniao Bras. Milho e Sorgho, Londrina, PR. p. 45.

  • Hallauer, A.R., 1992. Recurrent selection in maize. Plant Breed. Rev. 9: 115–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A.R. & J.B. Miranda Fo., 1988. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, C.A. & A.R. Hallauer, 1989. S2 recurrent selection in maize populations with exotic germplasm. Maydica 34: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, C.A. & A.R. Hallauer, 1991. Response to S2 recurrent selection in exotic and semi-exotic populations of maize (Zea mays L.) J. Iowa Acad Sci. 98:4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamkey, K.P., 1992. Fifty years of recurrent selection in the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic maize population. Maydica 37: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, M., N. Gimenes-Fernades, J.B. Miranda Fo. & J.C.V.A. Pereira, 1982. Introduction of maize (Zea mays L.) germplasms as sources for downy mildew (Peronosclerosporasorghi) resistance. Maydica 27: 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, M., J.B. Miranda Fo. & P.B. Gallo, 1984. Inbreeding depression in Brazilian populations of maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 29: 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livini, C., L. Pirovano, A. Brandolini, C. Lorenzoni & M. Motto, 1992. Evaluation of three cycles of recurrent selection for grain yield in anopaque-2 variety of maize. Maydica 37: 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mareck, J.H. & C.O. Gardner, 1979. Response to mass selection in maize and stability in resulting populations. Crop Sci. 19: 779–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.M. & A.R. Hallauer, 1980. Seven cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 20: 599–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M.S., 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75: 153–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo, M.O. & W.A. Compton, 1989. Five cycles of replicated S1 vs reciprocal full-sib, index selection in maize. Crop Sci. 29: 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, A.N., B.S. Dhillon & A.S. Khehra, 1990. Direct and indirect effects of selection on mean performance and combining ability in maize. Maydica 35: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, A.H. & O.S. Smith. 1987. Comparison of half-sib and S1 recurrent selection in the Krug Yellow Dent maize populations. Crop Sci. 27: 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasal. S.K., A. Ortega & S. Pandey. 1982. CIMMYT's Maize Germplasm Management, Improvement, and Utilization Program. Mexico. D.F.

  • Vianna, R.T., E.E.G. Gama, V. Naspolini Fo., J.R. Moro & R. Vencovsky, 1982. Inbreeding depression of several introduced populations of maize (Zea mays L.) Maydica 27: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S.P., W.A. Russell, K.R. Lamkey & P.R. White, 1991. Performance and inbreeding depression between a synthetic and three improved populations of maize. Crop Sci. 31: 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D.P., W.A. Compton & M.A. Thomas. 1980. A comparison of replicated S1 per se vs. reciprocal full-sib index selection in corn. 1. Indirect response to population densities. Crop Sci. 20: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A.J., 1980. The expected efficiencies of half-sib, testcross, and S1 progeny testing methods in single population improvement. Heredity 45: 361–376.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasal, S.K., Dhillon, B.S., Srinivasan, G. et al. Improvement in selfed and random-mated generations of four subtropical maize populations through S3 recurrent selection. Euphytica 83, 1–8 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01677854

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01677854

Key words

Navigation