Skip to main content
Log in

Gynoecious sex expression and stability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

  • Cytology and Genetics
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Results indicated that gynoecious stability in the F1 is governed by partial dominance. The degree of gynoecious stability is dependent upon genotypes, stages of plant for AgNO3 application and number of sprays. Depending upon the genotypes, the one-true-leaf stage and one spray of 250 ppm AgNO3 showed more gynoecious stability in the F1. Twice application of AgNO3 at the two-true-leaf stage produced the maximum number of male flowers. Plants exposed to light for longer time (10.00 h) after AgNO3 application produced less flowers than when exposed for shorter time (15.00 and 20.00 h).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyer, E.Jr. 1976. Silver ion: A potent antiethylene agent in cucumber and tomato. Hort. Sci. 11 (3): 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galun, E. & D., Atsmon, 1960. The leaf floral bud relationship of genetic sexual types in the cucumber plants. Bull. Israel Research Council 9D (1): 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. H., 1981. The inheritance and breeding of stability of gynoecious sex expression in cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) Ph. D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. 14853, USA.

  • Kalloo & S., Franken, 1978. Chemical induction of staminate flowers in four determinate gynoecious lines of pickling cucumber. Gartenbauwissenschaft 43 (6): 280–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, H. M., 1979. A summary of cucumber released from Cornell breeding program. Vegetable Improvement Newsletter 21: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijs, A. P. M.den & D. L., Visser, 1980. Induction of male flowering in gynoecious cucumbers. (Cucumis sativus L.) by silver ion. Euphytica 29: 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, K. W., G. E., Tolla & C. E., Peterson, 1980. Induction of staminate flowers on gynoecious cucumber by aminoethoxyvinylglycine. Hort. Sci. 15 (3): 256–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. E. & L. D., Anhder, 1960. Induction of staminate flowers on gynoecious cucumber with gibberellin A3. Science 131: 1673–1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponti, O. M. B.de & Y. O., Kho, 1977. Induction of male flowering in cucumber and gherkin by means of silver nitrate: an alternative to gibberellic acid. Zaadbelangen 31 (2): 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W. & W. G., Cochran, 1967. Statistical methods. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolla, G. E. & C. E., Peterson, 1979. Comparison of gibberellin A4/A7 and silver-nitrate for induction of staminate flowers in a gynoecious cucumber line (Cucumis sativus L.). Hort. Sci. 14 (4): 542–544.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Present address: Division of Vegetable Crops, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

More, T.A., Munger, H.M. Gynoecious sex expression and stability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica 35, 899–903 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028598

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028598

Index words

Navigation