Skip to main content
Log in

An Integrated Ecosystem Assessment of the Interior Columbia Basin

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Driven by the need to replace interim direction, address recent species listings as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, and break the gridlock of implementing actions, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (FS) and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), initiated an effort to develop a scientifically-sound, ecosystem-based strategy for lands they administer in the Interior Columbia Basin. The effort included an integrated assessment of 58.3 million ha in seven states describing the Basin's current conditions and risks associated with different management strategies. The assessment provides the foundation for environmental impact statements outlining management direction for 31 million hectares of FS and BLM administered lands. The process produced a framework for ecosystem management, ecosystem component (social, economic, landscape, terrestrial, and aquatic) assessments, and estimates of ecological integrity and socioeconomic resiliency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hann, W.J., Jones, J.L. Karl, M.G. and others. 1997, ‘Chapter 3: Landscape dynamics of the Basin,’ in: An assessment of ecosystem components in the Interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great BasinsQuigley, T.M. and Arbelbide, S.J. (tech. eds.), PNW-GTR-405 Vol II. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR., pp. 338–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R.W. and Horne, A.L. 1997, ‘Chapter 6: Economic assessment of the Basin’ in: An assessment of ecosystem components in the Interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great BasinsQuigley, T.M. and Arbelbide, S.J. (tech. eds.), PNW-GTR-405 Vol IV. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR., pp.1715–1869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R.W., Graham, R.T. and Quigley, T.M. 1996, A framework for ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia BasinPNW-GTR-374. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.C., Sedell, J.R., Rieman, B.E. and others. 1997, Chapter 4: ‘Broadscale assessment of aquatic species and habitats’ in: An assessment of ecosystem components in the Interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great BasinsQuigley, T.M. and Arbelbide, S.J., (tech. eds.), PNW-GTR-405 Vol III. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR., pp.1057–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool, S.F., Burchfield, J.A., and Allen, S.D. 1997, Chapter 7: 'social assessment’ in: An assessment of ecosystem components in the Interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great BasinsQuigley, T.M. and Arbelbide, S.J. (tech. eds.), PNW-GTR-405 Vol IV. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR., pp. 1873–2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, T.M., Haynes, R.W. and Graham, R.T. 1996, Integrated scientific assessment for ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia BasinPNW-GTR-382, USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. and Graham, R.T. 1997, ‘Chapter 1: An introduction’ in: An assessment of ecosystem components in the Interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great BasinsQuigley, T.M. and Arbelbide, S.J. (tech. eds.), PNW-GTR-405 Vol 1. USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR., pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, R.T., Quigley, T.M. & Gravenmier, R. An Integrated Ecosystem Assessment of the Interior Columbia Basin. Environ Monit Assess 64, 31–40 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006482232447

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006482232447

Navigation