Skip to main content
Log in

Split-hopkinson-bar tests on rock under confining pressure

Description of apparatus and test results is given. Attention is given to complete measurement of principal strain and resolution of initial stress-strain data

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of dynamic loading on the stress-strain and failure characteristics of nugget sandstone was investigated at strain rates from 102 to 103 per second and confining pressures to 30 ksi. The apparatus developed for these experiments consists of a conventional split Hopkinson bar enclosed in a pressure vessel. The apparatus permitted determination and recording of all principal stresses and strains from the onset of loading to failure. A description of the experimental techniques used in obtaining data including the method of determining stress and strain, the method of reducing data, and use of various shaped projectiles to tailor the input-stress wave are reported together with experimental results for nugget sandstone. All rocks tested exhibited an increase in strength as the loading rate increased. The dynamic stress-strain curves were similar in shape to curves from quasi-static testing of the same material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swanson, S. R. and Brown, W. S., “The Influence of State of Stress on the Stress-Strain Behavior of Rocks,” Paper No. 71-Met-AA to be published in Jnl. of Basic Engineering (1972).

  2. Brown, W. S. and Swanson, S. R., “Constitutive Equations for Westerly Granite and Cedar City Tonalite for a Variety of Loading Conditions,” University of Utah Final Report DASA-2473 (March 1970).

  3. Brown, W. S. and Swanson, S. R., “Influence of Load Path and State of Stress on Failure Strength and Stress-Strain Properties of Rocks,” Technical Report #AFWL-TR-70-53, Kirtland Air Force Base, N. M. (January 1971).

  4. Green, S. J., Leasia, J. D., Jones, A. H. and Perkins, R. D., “Multiaxial Stress Behavior of Solenhofen Limestone and Westerly Granite at High Strain Rates,” submitted for publication in the Jnl. of Geophysical Research (1971).

  5. Green, S. J. and Perkins, R. D., “Uniaxial Compression Tests at Strain Rates from 10 −4 /sec. to 10 4 /sec. on Three Geologic Materials.” Final Report DASA-2199. Also presented at the Tenth Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Austin, Tex. (1968).

  6. Kumar, A., “The Effects of Stress and Temperature on the Strength of Basalt and Granite,”Geophysics,33,501–510 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, A. H., Isbell, W. M., Shipman, F. H., Perkins, R. D., Green, S. J. andMaiden, C. J., “Material Properties Measurements for Selected Materials,”Interim Report, Contract No. NAS2-3427, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brace, W. R., Paulding, B. W. andScholz, C., “Dilatancy in the Fracture of Crystalline Rocks,”Jnl. of Geophysical Research,71,3939–3953 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chalupnik, J. D. andRipperger, E. A., “Dynamic Deformation of Metals under High Hydrostatic Pressure,”Experimental Mechanics,6 (11),547–554 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolsky, H., Stress Waves in Solids, Dover Publications, Inc., New York (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, D. H., andHunter, S. C., “The Dynamic Compression Testing of Solids by the Method of the Split Hopkinson Bar,”Jnl. of Mech. and Phys. Solids,11,115–179 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conn, A. F., “On the Use of Thin Wafers to Study Dynamic Properties of Metals,”Jnl. of Mech. and Phys. Solids,13,311–327 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christensen, R. J., “Dynamic Properties of Rocks,” MS Thesis, University of Utah (1971).

  14. Karnes, C. H. and Bertholf, L. D., “Numerical Investigation of Two-Dimensional, Axisymmetric Elastic-Plastic Wave Propagation Near the Impact End of Identical 1100-1 Aluminum Bars,” Battelle Colloquium on Inelastic Behavior of Solids (1969).

  15. Davies, R. M., “A Critical Study of the Hopkinson Pressure Bar,”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,240,375–452 (1948).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. “Progress Report on Stress and Strain Distribution in Strain Rate Testing,” Prepared by Agbabian-Jacobsen Associates. Los Angeles, Calif., R-71110-1787 (February 4, 1971).

  17. Green, S. J., Personal Communication, Terra-Tek, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah (January 1971).

  18. Handin, J., “Strength and Ductility,” Handbook of Physical Constants, Sydney P. Clark, ed. Geological Society of America Memoir,97,223–289 (1966).

  19. Brace, W. F. and Jones, A. H., “Comvarison of Uniaxial Deformation in Shock and Static Loading of Three Rocks,” Submitted for publication in the Jnl. of Geophysical Research (1971).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, R.J., Swanson, S.R. & Brown, W.S. Split-hopkinson-bar tests on rock under confining pressure. Experimental Mechanics 12, 508–513 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320747

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320747

Keywords

Navigation