Skip to main content
Log in

In defense of fiduciary media—or, we arenot devo(lutionists), we are Misesians!

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Fiduciary media are not fiat money. A monetary system with a commodity standard, competitive banking, and the freedom to use fiduciary media among consenting transactors is consistent with justice, efficiency, and economic stability. It is preferable on these scores both to a system (like today's) where the law has forced money-users to give up gold and gold-redeemable fiduciary media in favor of fiat money, and to a system (like those proposed by 100-percent-reserve advocates) where the law restricts money-users from holding any or some types of fiduciary media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block, Walter. 1988. “Fractional Reserve Banking: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.” In Walter Block and Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., eds.,Man, Economy, and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, S. G. 1975.Scottish Banking: A History, 1695–1973. Glasgow: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, Jesús Huerta. 1995. “A Critical Analysis of Central Banks and Fractional-Reserve Free Banking from the Austrian Perspective.”Review of Austrian Economics 8 (2): 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, Kevin, ed. 1992.The Experience of Free Banking. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, Roger W. 1985. “The Cost of a Gold Standard.” In Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., ed.,The Gold Standard: An Austrian Perspective. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, Gary B. 1988. “Banking Panics and Business Cycles.”Oxford Economic Papers 40 (December): 751–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1978.The Denationalisation of Money, 2nd ed. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, Richard. 1968.Banks, Banking, and Paper Currencies. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1994. “How is Fiat Money Possible?—or, the Devolution of Money and Credit.”Review of Austrian Economics 7 (2): 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 1995. “Free Banking and the Free Bankers.”Review of Austrian Economics 9 (1): 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, George. 1994. “Bank Contagion: A Review of the Theory and Evidence.”Journal of Financial Services Research 8 (April): 123–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1966.Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 3rd rev. ed. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1980.The Theory of Money and Credit. H. E. Batson, trans. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Monetary Commission. 1910.Interviews on the Banking and Currency Systems of Canada. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. 1957. “Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics.” In Mary Sennholz, ed.,On Freedom and Free Enterprise. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1962. “The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar.” In Leland B. Yeager, ed.,In Search of a Monetary Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1970a.Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles. Los Angeles: Nash.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1970b. “Power and Market: Government and the Economy. Menlo Park, Calif.: Institute for Humane Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1983a.The Ethics of Liberty. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1983b.The Mystery of Banking. New York: Richardson & Snyder.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1990.What Has Government Done to Our Money? 4th ed. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1995. “Fractional Reserve Banking.”The Freeman 45 (October): 624–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salsman, Richard M. 1990.Breaking the Banks: Central Banking Problems and Free Banking Solutions. Great Barrington, Mass.: American Institute for Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selgin, George A. 1989. “Legal Restrictions, Financial Weakening, and the Lender of Last Resort.”Cato Journal 9 (Fall): 429–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1990. “Monetary Equilibrium and the “Productivity Norm’ of Price-Level Policy.” In Richard M. Ebeling, ed.,Austrian Economics: Perspectives on the Past and Prospects for the Future. Hillsdale, Mich.: Hillsdale College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1992. “Bank Lending ‘Manias’ in Theory and History.”Journal of Financial Services Research 6 (March): 169–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1993. “In Defense of Bank Suspension.”Journal of Financial Services Research 7 (December): 347–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1994a. “Are Banking Crises Free-Market Phenomena?”Critical Review 8 (Fall): 591–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1994b. “Free Banking and Monetary Control.”The Economic Journal 104 (November): 1449–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1994c. “On Ensuring the Acceptability of a New Fiat Money.”Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 26 (November): 808–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1995. “The ‘Productivity Norm’ vs. Zero Inflation in the History of Economic Thought.”History of Political Economy 27 (Winter): 705–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selgin, George A., and Lawrence H. White. 1987. “The Evolution of a Free Banking System.”Economic Inquiry 25 (July): 439–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1994. “How Would the Invisible Hand Handle Money?”Journal of Economic Literature 32 (December): 1718–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1981.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dillen, J. G. 1934. “The Bank of Amsterdam.” In Van Dillen,History of the—Principal Public Banks. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Pp. 79–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Lawrence H. 1984.Free Banking in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1989.Competition and Currency: Essays on Free Banking and Money. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1990. “Commentary: Norms for Monetary Policy.” In Richard M. Ebeling, ed.,Austrian Economics: Perspectives on the Past and Prospects for the Future. Hillsdale, Mich.: Hillsdale College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1992. “Mises on Free Banking and Fractional Reserves.” In John W. Robbins and Mark Spangler, eds.,A Man of Principle: Essays in Honor of Hans F. Sennholz. Grove City, Penn.: Grove City College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1993. “Why is the U.S. Banking Industry in Trouble? Business Cycles, Loan Losses, and Deposit Insurance.” In Lawrence H. White, ed.,The Crisis in American Banking. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • --. 1995. “The Evolution of Hayek's Monetary Economics.” Unpublished ms. University of Georgia.

  • Yeager, Leland B. 1986. “The Significance of Monetary Disequlibrium.”The Cato Journal 6 (Fall): 369–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With apologies to Devo, the '80s rock band who used the slogan “Are We Not Men? We Are Devo!”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selgin, G., White, L.H. In defense of fiduciary media—or, we arenot devo(lutionists), we are Misesians!. Rev Austrian Econ 9, 83–107 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103331

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103331

Keywords

Navigation