Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endpaper: Technical issues of separation in function cells and value cells

  • Published:
LISP and Symbolic Computation

Summary

The bulk of arguments that focus on clean semantics and notational simplicity tend to favor uniting the function and value namespaces. In spite of this, there are those who hold strongly to a belief that a two-namespace system affords useful expressive power that they are unwilling to do without. In the end, practical considerations favor the status quo for Common Lisp. There are a large number of improvements beyond a single namespace that could be made to Common Lisp that would clean it up and simplify it. We feel that the time for such radical changes to Common Lisp has passed, and it is the job of future Lisp designers to take the lessons from Common Lisp and Scheme to produce an improved Lisp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, H., and Sussman, G.J., with J. Sussman.Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.A., Gabriel, R.P., and Steele, G.L., Jr. S-1 Common Lisp Implementation, Proceedings of the 1982 ACM Symposium on Lisp and Functional Programming, Pittsburgh, PA, August 1982.

  • Digital Equipment Corporation.VAX LISP/VMS User's Guide. Maynard, MA, 1986.

  • Gabriel, R.P.Performance and Evaluation of Lisp Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, R. MultiLisp, Proceedings of the 1984 ACM Symposium on Lisp and Functional Programming, August 1984.

  • Kohlbecker, E.E., Jr.Syntactic Extensions in the Programming Language Lisp. Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, August 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucid, Inc.Lucid Common Lisp Reference Manual for the VAX. Menlo Park, CA, 1986.

  • McCarthy, J., et al.Lisp 1.5 Programmer's Manual. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padget, J., et al. Desiderata for the standardisation of LISP, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming, Cambridge, MA, August 1986.

  • Pitman, K.M.The Revised Maclisp Manual (Saturday Evening Edition). LCS Technical Report 295, MIT, Cambridge, MA, May 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J., and Clinger, W. (Eds.).Revised 3 Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme. SIGPLAN Notices 21(12), September 1986.

  • Steele, G.L., Jr.,Common Lisp, The Language. Digital Press, Billerica, MA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, G.L., Jr., and Hillis, W.D. Connection Machine™ Lisp: Fine-Grained Parallel Symbolic Processing, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM Conference on Lisp and Functional Programming, Cambridge, MA, August 1986.

  • Sussman, G.J., and Steele, G.L., Jr.,SCHEME: An Interpreter for Extended Lambda Calculus. AI Memo 349, MIT, Cambridge, MA, December 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symbolics, Inc.MACSYMA Reference Manual. Cambridge, MA, 1986a.

  • Symbolics, Inc. Symbolics Common Lisp: Language concepts.Encyclopedia Symbolica Vol. 2A, pp. 296–297, Cambridge, MA, 1986b.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lucid, Inc. and Stanford University, USA

    Richard P. Gabriel

  2. Symbolics, Inc., USA

    Kent M. Pitman

Authors
  1. Richard P. Gabriel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kent M. Pitman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper is an adaptation of a report produced for X3J13 by the authors, a technical working group engaged in standardizing Common Lisp for ANSI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gabriel, R.P., Pitman, K.M. Endpaper: Technical issues of separation in function cells and value cells. Lisp and Symbolic Computation 1, 81–101 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01806178

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01806178

Keywords

Search

Navigation