Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of a polymethylmethacrylate and glass-ionomer bone cement using a hemiarthroplasty in the rabbit femur

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cements present various problems with respect to biocompatibility and stability. In order to study the histological changes at the bone-cement interface following total hip replacement, a small animal model was created by implanting hip prostheses using two different bone cements (PMMA and glass-ionomer cement, GIC). Two problems with the use of GIC for fixation of the prosthesis became evident. One year following implantation, histomorphometric analysis of femurs containing the GIC demonstrated significantly higher amounts of osteoid at the bone-cement interface. This disturbance of mineralization is comparable with osteomalacia and probably due to leaching of aluminum ions. In addition the mechanical properties of GIC proved to be inadequate for the loads placed upon it in this hip replacement model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. L. MARKOLF and H. C. AMSTUTZ,Clin. Orthop. 121 (1976) 99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. LIDGREN, H. DRAR and J. MÖLLER,Acta Orthop. Scand. 55 (1984) 536.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. W. BURKE, E. I. GATES and W. H. HARRIS,J. Bone Jt. Surg. 66-A (1984) 1265.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. M. PILLIAR, R. BLACKWELL, I. MACNAB, and H. U. CAMERON,J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 10 (1976) 893.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. POURDEYHEMI and H. D. WAGNER, ibid.23 (1989) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. M. RIJKE and M. R. RIEGER, ibid.11 (1977) 373.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. J. VAN MULLEM and J. R. DE WIJN,J. Cranio-Max.-Fac. Surg. 16 (1988) 99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. R. DAI, Y. K. LIU, J. B. PARK and C. R. CLARK,J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25 (1991) 141.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. HENNIG and B. A. BLENCKE, H. BRÖMER, K. K. DEUTSCHER, A. GROSS, and W. EGE, ibid.13 (1979) 89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. MITTELMEIER, U. HANSER and J. HARMS,Z. ORTHOP. 118 (1980) 658.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. P. PATEL, M. BRADEN and K. W. M. DAVY,Biomaterials 8 (1987) 53.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. NIMB, J. STÜRUP and J. S. JENSEN,J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (1993) 565.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. D. WILSON and J. W. McLEAN, in “Glass-ionomer cements” (Quintessence Pub. Co. Chicago, IL, 1988) pp. 13–126.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. WOOD and R. HILL,Biomaterials 12 (1991) 164.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. M. JONCK, C. J. GROBBELAAR and H. STRATING,Clin. Mater. 4 (1989) 85.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. M. JONCK and C. J. GROBBELAAR, ibid.6 (1990) 323.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. L. RADIN, C. T. RUBIN, E. L. THRASHER, L. E. LANYON, A. M. CRUGNOLA, A. S. SCHILLER, I. L. PAUL, and R. M. ROSE,J. Bone Jt. Surg. 64-A (1982) 1188.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. SPECTOR, S. SHORTKROFF, H. P. HSU, N. LANE, C. B. SLEDGE and T. S. THORNHILL,Clin. Orthop. 261 (1990) 140.

    Google Scholar 

  19. U. M. GROSS and V. STRUNZ,Stain Technol. 52 (1977) 217.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. RINECKER,Acta Orthop. Traumat. Surg. 97 (1980) 263.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. EFTEKHAR,Clin. Orthop. 81 (1971) 93.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. D. BECKENBAUGH and D. M. ILSTRUP,J. Bone Jt. Surg. 60-A (1978) 306.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. FEITH,Acta Orthop. Scand., Suppl.161 (1975).

  24. K. DRAENERT and J. RUDIGIER,Chirurg 49 (1978) 276.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H.-G. WILLERT, J. LUDWIG and M. SEMLITSCH,J. Bone Jt. Surg. 56-A (1974) 1368.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H.-G. WILLERT, in “Implant bone interface”, edited by J. Older (Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1990) pp. 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. NEUMANN and B. J. JENSEN,Acta Orthop. Scand. 60 (1989) 361.

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. ALBREKTSSON and C. JOHANSSON, in “The bone-biomaterial interface”, edited by J. E. Davies (University of Toronto Press, Toronto-Buffalo-London, 1991) pp. 357–363.

    Google Scholar 

  29. O. LANGER and H.-J. SCHMITZ, in Workshop Transactions, Fourth World Biomaterials Congress, Berlin, April 1992, WX 7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erbe, M., van Dyck-Erbe, R.L. & Schmitz, H.J. Comparison of a polymethylmethacrylate and glass-ionomer bone cement using a hemiarthroplasty in the rabbit femur. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 7, 517–522 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705435

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705435

Keywords

Navigation