Skip to main content
Log in

Some observations on the environmental impact of the UK flue gas desulphurisation programme

  • Papers
  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Concern about the environmental damage caused by acid deposition has lead to national programmes to reduce acid precursor emissions. In the UK, a retrofit programme of flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) to three 2,000 MW coal-fired power stations has been announced, with up to four new stations equipped with FGD likely to follow by the year 2000. Whilst the positive effects of acid deposition abatement are recognised there has been considerable concern over the negative aspects of the programme arising, particularly, from the raw material requirements of an FGD plant and the need to dispose of waste products. A careful choice of the most appropriate technology can significantly reduce the negative impacts but such a choice can only be made after an environmental assessment of the national FGD programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettleheim, J., Littler, A. and Kyte, W.S. (1981) Fifty years experience of flue gas desulphurisation at power stations in the United Kingdom.Chem. Eng., 275.

  • CEGB (1986a)Statistical Yearbook 1985/86. Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEGB (1986b)CEGB to reduce power station emissions recommendation to Government based on new research results. Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) Press Information, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEGB (1986c)New coal stations — Statement from CEGB. Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) Press Information, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEGB (1987a)Power stations to have world's largest sulphur removal equipment. Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) Press Information, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEGB (1987b)FGD limestone not to be taken from national parks. Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) Press Information, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (1986) Government proposes new action to tackle the problem of acid rain.DOE News Release. Department of the Environment, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, E.W. (1987) Personal communication. Planning Project Manager (FGD), CEGB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENDS (1986)Acid emissions: an opportunity for British industry. ENDS Report 140, September, London.

  • EPRI (1984)The evaluation and status of flue gas desulphurisation systems. Prepared by the Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report No CS 3322.

  • EPRI (1986)Economic evaluation of FGD systems, Volume 5. The NOXSO and SOXAL sodium based processes and four additional calcium based processes. Prepared by the Stearns Catalytic Corporation, Denver, Colorado. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report CS 3342.

  • Guardian (1987) Power board denies park quarry threat. June 23, London.

  • Harrison, D.J. and Adlam, K.A.McL. (1984) The limestone and dolomite resources of the Peak District, Derbyshire and Staffordshire.Miner.Asses.Rep.Brit.Geol.Surv., 144.

  • Kyte, W.S. (1986) Possible emission control technologies for coal fired power stations in the United Kingdom. Presented at “The problem of acid emission: an opportunity for British industry”. Institution of Chemical Engineers Conference, September 22–23, Birmingham.

  • Kyte, W.S. (1987) Technical possibilities for achieving target reductions in air pollution levels using clean technologies. Presented at “The international pollution abatement conference”, April 6–8, Birmingham.

  • Longhurst, J.W.S., Green, S.E. and Lee, D.S. (1987)Acid deposition in the northern hemisphere. Acid Rain Information Centre, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiling, W., Leibfritz, R., Schons, G. and Rentz, O. (1987) Technologies and market implications of the control of acid deposition from major power generation sources. Presented at “The international pollution abatement conference”, April 6–8, Birmingham.

  • Santhanam, C.J., Valentine, J.R. and Balesco, A.A. (1984)An evaluation of the disposal of flue gas desulphurisation wastes in coal mines and the oceans: mine disposal demonstration tests. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA 600/7-84-099.

  • UNECE (1985)Air pollution across boundaries. Air Pollution Studies 2. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, S.C. (1986) Abatement systems for SOx, NOx and particles — technical options.Environmentalist 6(2), 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidner, H. (1986)Air pollution in the Federal Republic of Germany. Laws, regulations, impementation and principal shortcomings. Edition Sigma, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijdeveld, H.W.J. (1987) Technologies for control of air pollution from stationary sources — by-product utilisation and waste disposal.Econ. Bull. Europ. 31(1), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • YDNPC (1987)The use of limestone in the reduction of sulphur emissions from power stations. Yorkshire Dales National Park Report to Committee, May 7.

  • Yorkshire Post (1987) Famous landscapes face drastic scars. June 22, Leeds.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr James Longhurst is the Director of the Acid Rain Information Centre at Manchester Polytechnic. The centre is supported by the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities and the Department of the Environment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Longhurst, J.W.S. Some observations on the environmental impact of the UK flue gas desulphurisation programme. Environmentalist 8, 115–121 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240277

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240277

Keywords

Navigation