Skip to main content
Log in

Field evidence that host selection by conopid parasitoids is related to host body size

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The body size of the host insect in which a parasitoid develops can have important effects on its development and life history. Large and small host body size have both been suggested to be advantageous to parasitoids, depending on the life-history of the species concerned. We test field data on the bumblebeeBombus terrestris and its conopid parasitoids for evidence of differences in size between parasitised and unparasitised worker bees. Bees acting as hosts for conopid parasitoids are on average larger-bodied than unparasitised bees. This result holds for bees collected in two different years, and whether bees are collected while foraging or from the nest. The results we present demonstrate differential parasitism of hosts of different body sizes, but do not necessarily indicate active host choice by conopids. However, they are in agreement with independent evidence that conopids develop more successfully in large-than in small-bodied hosts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford, D. V., 1975.Bumblebees. Davies-Poynter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Alphen, J. J. M. and R. A. B. Drijver, 1982. Host selection byAsobara tabida Nees (Bracon-idae; Alysiinae), a larval parasitoid of fruit inhabitingDrosophila species. I. Host stage selection withDrosophila melanogaster as hosts species.Neth. J. Zool. 32:194–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, D. and P. DeBach, 1981. Effects of temperature and host age upon the encapsulation ofMetaphycus stanleyi andMetaphycus helvolus eggs by brown soft scaleCoccus hesperidium.J. Invert. Path. 37:351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H. C. J., 1994.Parasitoids, Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. J., 1958. Observations on the biology ofCaraphractus cinctus Walker (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), a parasite of the eggs of Dytiscidae I. Methods of rearing and numbers bred on different host eggs.Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 110:533–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. H., 1987. Offspring sex ratios in parasitoid wasps.Q. Rev. Biol. 62:367–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knee, W. J. and J. T. Medler, 1965. The seasonal size increase of bumblebee workers (Hymenoptera: Bombus).Can. Entomol. 97:1149–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouamé, K. L. and M. Mackauer, 1991. Influence of aphid size, age and behaviour on host choice by the parasitoid waspEphedrus californicus: A test of host-size models.Oecologia 88:197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouvreau, A., 1974. Les enemies des bourdons II. Organismes affectant les adultes.Apidologia 5:39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G., 1941. The effects of hosts upon their insect parasites.Biol. Rev. 16:239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G., 1968. The resistance of insect parasitoids to the defence reactions of their hosts.Biol. Rev. 43:200–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel, P. and R. Schmid-Hempel, 1988. Parasitic flies (Conopidae, Diptera) may be important stress factors for the ergonomics of their bumblebee host.Ecol. Ent. 13:469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel, P., C. Müller, R. Schmid-Hempel and J. A. Shykoff, 1990. Frequency and ecological correlates of parasitism by conopid flies (Conopidae, Diptera) in population of bumblebees.Ins. Soc. 37:14–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel, R., 1994. Evolutionary ecology of a host-parasitoid interaction. Ph.D. thesis, University of Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel, R. and P. Schmid-Hempel, 1996. Larval developmental of two parasitic flies (Conopidae) in the common hostBombus pascuorum. Ecol. Ent. (in press).

  • Schmidt, G. T., 1974. Host-acceptance behaviour ofCampoletis sonorensis towardHeliothis zea.Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 67:835–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B. and G. F. Iwantsch, 1980. Host suitability for insect parasitoids.Annu. Rev. Ent. 25:397–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, M. E., 1994. The importance of being large: the relationship between size and fitness in females of the parasitoidAphaereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).J. Anim. Ecol. 63:963–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. D., R. L. Ridgway and S. B. Vinson, 1974. Host acceptance and oviposition behaviour of the parasitoidCampoletis sonorensis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 67:271–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. B. Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, C.B., Blackburn, T.M. & Schmid-Hempel, P. Field evidence that host selection by conopid parasitoids is related to host body size. Ins. Soc 43, 227–233 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242924

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242924

Key words

Navigation