Skip to main content
Log in

Inhibition of worker mating by queens in a sweat bee,Lasioglossum zephyrum

Paarungshemmung durch die Königin bei Arbeiterinnen von Turchenbienen Lasioglassum Zephyrum

  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

About 18 percent ofLasioglossum zephyrum workers mate in the field. In the laboratory female mating receptivity varied with age and caste: 1) sixty-nine percent of bees less than 3 days old mated when kept isolated from other females, 2) in six-bee colonies all of the queens, but only 7,7 percent of their workers, mated, 3) in queen removal experiments involving 10 colonies, all the replacement queens mated (these same individuals were not receptive to mating as workers), 4) in one colony of 5 bees, consecutive queen removal showed that each of the four bees identified as the queen mated, while none of the remaining workers did so. The results indicate that queen inhibition governs behavior of the workers even outside the nest. The inhibition may involve more than differences in ovarian size.

Zusammenfassung

Ungefähr 18% der Arbeiterinnen vonLasioglossum zephyrum werden unter natürlichen Freilandbedingungen begattet. In der Gefangenschaft variiert die Bereitschaft der Weibchen zur Begattung mit dem Alter und dem Kastenzustand: 1) Von anderen Weibchen isolierte Weibchen paarten sich zu 69% innerhalb von drei Tagen nach dem Schlüpfen. 2) In Nestgruppen von je sechs Bienen paarten sich alle Königinnen, jedoch nur 7,7 % aller Arbeiterinnen. 3) Nach künstlicher Entfernung der Königin verpaarten sich die Ersatzköniginnen in allen von zehn Fällen. Diese Ersatzköniginnen waren alle vorher in Gegenwart der alten Königin unverpaart. 4) In einer Kolonie von fünf Bienen paarten sich alle drei Ersatzköniginnen nachdem der Reihe nach die jeweilige Königin entfernt worden war. Gleichzeitig wurden keine der jeweiligen Restarbeiterinen begattet. Diese Ergebnisse zeigen an, dass die Königin die Paarungsbeitschaft der Arbeiterinnen auch ausserhalb des Nestes inhibiert. Es erscheint möglich, dass sich Inhibition durch eine Königin nicht nur auf die Grösse der Ovarien von Arbeiterinnen auswirkt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander R.D., 1974. — The evolution of social behavior.Annu.Rev. Ecol. Syst., 5, 325–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows E.M., 1975. — Mating behavior in halictine bees.Ph. D. dissertation, University of Kansas.

  • Batra S.W.T., 1966. — The life cycle and behavior of the primitively social bee,Lasioglossum zephyrum (Halictidæ).Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 46, 359–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers D.J., Michener C.D., 1974. — Interactions in colonies of primitively social bees. III. Ethometry of division of labor inLasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halictidæ).J. Comp. Physiol., 90, 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckle G.R., in prep. — Caste differences and nestmate interactions inLasioglossum zephyrum.

  • Crozier R.H., 1979. — The genetics of sociality.In The social insects, Vol. 1, Hermann (H. R.),Academic Press, New York, 223–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg L., in prep. —Year-round rearing of a sweat bee.

  • Hamilton W.D., 1964. — The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I and II.J. Theor. Biol., 7, 1–52. 1972. Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 3, 193–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N., Michener C.D.,1972. — Evolution of sociality in insects.Quart. Rev. Biol., 47, 131–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litte M., 1977. — Aspects of the social biology of the beeHalictus ligatus in New York State.Insectes Soc., 24, 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D., 1974. — The social behavior of the bees.Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, (Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D., Wille A., 1961. — The bionomics of a primitively social bee,Lasioglossum inconspicuum.Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 42, 1123–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D., Brothers D.J., 1971. — A simplified observation nest for burrowing bees.J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 44, 236–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D., Brothers D.J.,1974. — Were workers of eusocial hymenoptera initially altruistic or oppressed?Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 671–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R.L., Hare H., 1976. — Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects.Science, 191, 249–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard M.J., 1975. — The evolution of social behavior by kin selection.Quart. Rev. Biol., 50, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard M.J., 1978. — Polygyny and the evolution of social behavior in wasps.J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 51, 832–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E.O., 1975. — Sociobiology.Harvard Univ. Press., Cambridge, (Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenberg, L., Buckle, G.R. Inhibition of worker mating by queens in a sweat bee,Lasioglossum zephyrum . Ins. Soc 28, 347–352 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224192

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224192

Keywords

Navigation