Abstract
A test to evaluate earthquake prediction algorithms is being applied to a Russian algorithm known asM8 TheM8 algorithm makes intermediate term predictions for earthquakes to occur in a large circle, based on integral counts of transient seismicity in the circle. In a retroactive prediction for the period January 1, 1985 to July 1, 1991 the algorithm as configured for the forward test would have predicted eight of ten strong earthquakes in the test area. A null hypothesis, based on random assignment of predictions, predicts eight earthquakes in 2.87% of the trials. The forward test began July 1, 1991 and will run through December 31, 1997. As of July 1, 1995, the algorithm had forward predicted five out of nine earthquakes in the test area, which success ratio would have been achieved in 53% of random trials with the null hypothesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Habermann, R. E., andCreamer, F. (1994),Catalog Errors and the M8 Earthquake Prediction Algorithm, Bull. Seismcl. Soc. Am.84, 1551–1559.
Healy, J. H., Kossobokov, V. G., andDewey, J. W. (1992),A test to evaluate the earthquake prediction algorithm, M8, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Report 92-401, 23 pp. with 6 Appendices.
Keilis-Borok, V. I. (editor) (1990),Intermediate-term Earthquake Prediction: Models, Algorithms, Worldwide Tests, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.61 (Special Issue), Nos. 1–2.
Keilis-Borok, V. I., andKossobokov, V. G. (1984),A Complex of Long-term Precursors for the Strongest Earthquakes of the World, Proc. 27th Geological Congress61 (Nauka), 56–66.
Keilis-Borok, V. I., andKossobokov, V. G. (1987),Periods of High Probability of Occurrence of the World's Strongest Earthquakes, Computational Seismology19 (Allerton Press Inc.), 45–53.
Keilis-Borok, V. I., andKossobokov, V. G. (1990a),Premonitory Activation of Seismic Flow: Algorithm M8, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.61, 73–83.
Keilis-Borok, V. I., andKossobokov, V. G. (1990b),Times of Increased Probability of Strong Earthquakes (M≥7.5) Diagnosed by Algorithm M8 in Japan and Adjacent Territories, J. Geophys. Res.95, 12413–12422.
Kossobokov, V. G. (1994),Intermediate-term Changes of Seismicity in Advance of the Guam Earthquake on August 8 1993, EOS (Transactions, American Geophysical Union)75, No. 25, AGU 1994 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Additional Abstracts SE22A-10.
Kossobokov, V. G., Healy, J. H., Dewey, J. W., andTikhonov, I. N. (1994),Precursory Changes of Seismicity before the October 4, 1994 Southern Kuril Islands Earthquake, EOS (Transactions, American Geophysical Union) 75, No. 44, 1994 AGU Fall Meeting Addendum, S51F-11.
Kossobokov, V. G., Keilis-Borok, V. I., andSmith, S. W. (1990),Localization of Intermediate-term Earthquake Prediction, J. Geophys. Res.95, 19763–19772.
Minster, J.-B., andWilliams, N. P. (1992),The “M8” Intermediate-term Earthquake Prediction Algorithm: An Independent Assessment, EOS (Transactions, American Geophysical Union)73, 366.
Press, F. (Chairman) (1965),Earthquake Prediction: A Proposal for a Ten-year Program of Research. A Report of the Ad Hoc Panel on Earthquake Prediction to the Office of Science and Technology, (Washington, D.C., September 1965).
Shebalin, P. N. (1987),Compilation of Earthquake Catalogs as the Task of Clustering with Learning, Doklady Ac. Sci. USSR292, 1083–1086.
Updike, R. G. (editor) (1989),Proceedings of the National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council, U.S. Geol. Surv Open-File Rep.89–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kossobokov, V.G., Healy, J.H. & Dewey, J.W. Testing an earthquake prediction algorithm. PAGEOPH 149, 219–232 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00945168
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00945168