Abstract
This note examines the accuracy of finite difference solutions of the midlatitude primitive equations and the quasi-geostrophic equation. First order accurate forward differencing of the equations' lower boundary condition is shown to poorly simulate the radiating wave response to midlatitude heating. Forward differencing always exaggerates the magnitude of the radiating response. For a realistic heating height scale and for a reasonable mesh size this exaggeration is on the order of 50%. Central differencing of the lower boundary condition gives an error of only about 3%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Charney, J. G. (1973),Planetary Fluid Dynamics. In: Dynamic Meteorology,Morel, P. ed., D. Reidel.
Lin, B. (1982),The behaviour of winter stationary planetary waves forced by topography and diabatic heating. J. Atmos. Sci.39, 1206–1226.
Lindzen, R. S. andBlake, D. W. (1972),Lamb waves in the presence of realistic distributions of temperature and dissipation. J. Geophys. Res.77, 2166–2176.
Lindzen, R. S., Aso, T. andJacqmin, D. (1982),Linearized calculations of stationary waves in the atmosphere. J. Met. Soc. Japan60, 66–77.
Rong-Hui, H. andGambo, K. (1982),The response of a hemisphere multilevel model atmosphere to forcing by topography and stationary heat sources. J. Met. Soc. Japan60, 78–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Center for Earth and Planetary Physics, Harvard University
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacqmin, D. A note on the finite differencing of the linearized primitive equations' lower boundary condition. PAGEOPH 123, 441–447 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880742
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880742