Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the reflectivity method and full wave theory as applied to SH diffraction around the core

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
pure and applied geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To derive the structure of the Lower Mantle, observations of P and S waves at epicentral distances beyond 90 degrees have been used. The arrival times and amplitude decay with distance proved to be a source of information to derive the structure near the core-mantle interface. These observations were compared with results of theoretical calculations based on full wave theory [1, 2, 5, 6]. Another important theoretical method is the reflectivity method [4]. Differences between the two methods have a direct bearing on the interpretation of the observations and therefore need to be investigated.

In the two methods the wave propagation involved in diffraction is simulated in different ways. In this paper the importance of approximations involved in each of the methods will be discussed. For this purpose the calculation of the frequency-dependent decay with distance of diffracted SH waves has been chosen. The approximations are considered to be important both in P and SH diffraction. The advantage of studying SH waves is the simpler and more straightforward formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Doornbos, D. J. andMondt, J. C. (1979a),Attenuation of P and S waves diffracted around the core, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc.57, 353–379.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doornbos, D. J. andMondt, J. C. (1979b),P and S waves diffracted around the core and the velocity structure at the base of the mantle, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc.57, 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dziewonski, A. M., Hales, A. L. andLapwood, E. R. (1975),Parametrically simple earth models consistent with geophysical data, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter.10, 12–48.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fuchs, K. andMüller, G. (1971),Computation of synthetic seismograms with the reflectivity method and comparison with observations, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc.23, 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mondt, J. C. (1977a),SH-waves: theory and observations for epicentral distances greater than 90 degrees, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter.15, 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mondt, J. C. (1977b),Full wave theory and the structure of the lower mantle, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utrecht.

  7. Richards, P. G. (1976),On the adequacy of plane-wave reflection/transmission coefficients in the analysis of seismic body waves, Bull. seism. Soc. Am.66, 701–717.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mondt, J.C., Pootjes, H.J. A comparison of the reflectivity method and full wave theory as applied to SH diffraction around the core. PAGEOPH 118, 1228–1231 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01593063

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01593063

Key words

Navigation