Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The accessory gland proteins in maleDrosophila: structural, reproductive, and evolutionary aspects

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent results from biochemical and molecular genetic studies of the accessory gland proteins in maleDrosophila are reviewed. The most prominent feature is the species-specific variability. However, the analysis of the sex peptide inD. melanogaster shows that there is a strong homology in the molecular structure to the closely related sibling species, and that divergence increases with increasing phylogenetic distance. For this reason the sex peptide, after being transferred to the female genital tract during copulation, reduces receptivity and increases oviposition only in virgin females belonging to the same species group and subgroup. Even though studies were hitherto limited to a small number of the secretory components, it is evident that the accessory gland proteins play a key role in reproductive success of the fruit fly by changing female sexual behavior, supporting sperm transfer, storage and displacement. Thus, genes encoding the accessory gland proteins are apparently under strong evolutionary selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aguadè, M., Miyashita, N., and Langley, C., Polymorphism and divergence in theMst26a male accessory gland gene region inDrosophila. Genetics132 (1992) 755–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aigaki, T., Fleischmann, I., Chen, P. S., and Kubli, E., Ectopic expression of sex peptide alters reproductive behavior of femaleD. melanogaster. Neuron7 (1991) 557–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bairati, A., Structure and ultrastructure of the male reproductive system inD. melanogaster Meig. 2. The genital duct and accessory glands. Monit. Zool. Ital. (NS)2 (1968) 105–182.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baumann, H., The isolation, partial characterization and biosynthesis of the paragonial substances PS-1 and PS-2 ofD. funebris. J. Insect Physiol.20 (1974) 2181–2194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumann, M., Wilson, K. J., Chen, P. S., and Humbel, R. E., The amino-acid sequence of a peptide (PS-1) fromDrosophila funebris: A paragonial peptide from males which reduces the receptivity of the females. Eur. J. Biochem.52 (1975) 521–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Betram, M. J., Akerkar, G. A., Gonzàlez, C., and Wolfner, M. F., Cell type-specific gene expression in theDrosophila melanogaster male accessory gland. Mech. Dev.38 (1992) 33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bixler, A., Jenkins, J. B., Tompkins, L., and McRobert, S. P., Identification of acoustic stimuli that mediate sexual behavior inDrosophila buskii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav.5 (1992) 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bownes, M., and Patridge, L., Transfer of molecules from ejaculate to famales inDrosophila pseudoobscura. J. Insect Physiol.33 (1987) 941–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burnet, B., and Connolly, K., Activity and sexual behaviour inDrosophila melanogaster, in: The Genetics of Behaviour, pp. 201–258. Ed. J. H. F. van Abeelen, North Holland 1974.

  10. Chapman, T., Liddle, L., Kalb, J., Wolfner, M. F., and Patridge, L., Cost of mating inDrosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature373 (1995) 241–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, P. S., Species-specific patterns inDrosophila paragonial glands. Experientia32 (1976) 549–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, P. S., The functional morphology and biochemistry of insect male accessory glands and their secretions. A. Rev. Ent.29 (1984) 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, P. S., Biochemistry and molecular regulation of the male accessory gland secretions inDrosophila (Diptera). Annls Soc. ent. Fr. (N.S.)27 (1991) 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, P. S., and Balmer, J., Secretory proteins and sex peptide of the male accessory gland inDrosophila sechellia. J. Insect Physiol.35 (1989) 759–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, P. S., Stumm-Zollinger, E., and Caldelari, M., Protein metabolism ofDrosophila male accessory glands—II. Species-specificity of secretion proteins. Insect Biochem.15 (1985) 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, P. S., Stumm-Zollinger, E., Aigaki, T., Balmer, J., Bienz, M., Böhlen, P., A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproduc-tive behavior of femaleD. melanogaster. Cell54 (1988) 291–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark, A. G., Silveria, S., Meyers, W., and Langley, C. H., Nature screen: an efficient method for screening natural populations ofDrosophila for P-element insertion. Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA91 (1994) 719–722.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark, A. G., Aguadè, M., Prout, T., Harshman, L. G., and Langley, C. H., Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics139 (1995) 189–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. David, J., Influence de la fecondation de la femelle sur le numbre et la taille des oeufs pondus. J. Insect Physiol.9 (1963) 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DiBenedetto, A. J., Harada, H. A., and Wolfner, M., Structure, cell-specific expression, and mating induced regulation of aDrosophila melanogaster male accessory gland gene. Devl Biol.139 (1990) 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleischmann, I., Dauwalder, B., Chapman, T., Cotton, B., and Kubli, E., Thedunce gene product might be physiologically involved in sex-peptide response inDrosophila melanogaster. (Abstract S12-11). Experientia51 (1995) A59.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fowler, G. L., Some aspects of the reproductive biology ofDrosophila: Sperm transfer, sperm storage and sperm utilization. Adv. Genet.17 (1973) 293–360.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gillott, C., Arthropoda—Insecta, in: Reproductive Biology of Invertebrate, vol. 3: Accessory Sex Glands, pp. 319–471. Eds K. G. Adiyodi and R. G. Adiyodi. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gonzàlez, A. M., Cabrera, V. M., Larruga, J. M., and Guillo, A., Genetic distance in the sibling speciesDrosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans andDrosophila mauritiana. Evolution36 (1982) 517–522.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hadorn, E., Zur Autonomie und Phasenspezifität der Letalität von Bastarden zwischenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans. Rev. suisse zool.68 (1961) 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Happ, G. M., Structure and development of male accessory glands in insects, in: Insect Ultrastructure, vol. 2, pp. 365–398. Eds. R. C. King, and H. Aki. Plenum Press, New York 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harris, M. O., and Miller, J. R., Quantitative analysis of ovipositional behavior: effects of a host plant chemical on the onion fly (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). J. Insect Behavior4 (1991) 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harshman, L. G., and Prout, T., Sperm displacement without sperm transfer inDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution48 (1994) 753–766.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ito, Y., and Yamagishi, M., Sperm competition in the melon fly,Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): Effects of sequential matings with normal and virgin or non-virgin sterile males. Appl. Ent. Zool.24 (1989) 466–477.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jallon, J. M., Laugè, G., Orssaud, L., and Antony, C., Female pheromones inDrosophila melanogaster are controlled by the doublesex locus. Genet. Res.51 (1988) 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kalb, J. M., DiBenedetto, A. J., and Wolfner, M., Probing the function ofDrosophila melanogaster accessory glands by directed cell ablation. Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA90 (1993) 8093–8097.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Knipling, E. F., The Basic Principles of Insect Population Suppression and Management. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 512, Washington, D.C. (cited from Spencer et al.57).

  33. Kubli, E., My favorite molecule: the sex peptide. BioEssays.14 (1992) 779–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kubli, E., TheDrosophila sex-peptide: A peptide pheromone involved in reproduction, in: Advances in Developmental Biochemistry, vol. 4, pp. 99–128. Ed. P. Wassermann. JAl Press Inc. USA 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lamb, M. J., The effect of radiation on the longevity of femaleDrosophila subobscura. J. Insect Physiol.10 (1964) 487–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lemeunier, F., and Ashburner, M., Relationships within themelanogaster species group of the genusDrosophila (Sophophora). II. Phylogenetic relationship between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. Proc. R. Soc., London,193 (1976) 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lemeunier, F., and Ashburner, M., Relationships within themelanogaster species subgroup of the genusDrosophila (Sophophora). IV. The chromosomes of two new species. Chromosoma89 (1984) 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lindsley, D. L., and Zimm, G. G., The Genome ofDrosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego, California 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Luckinbill, L. S., Arking, R., Clare, M. J., Cirocco, W. C., and Buck, S. A., Selection of delayed senescence inDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution38 (1984) 996–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Manning, A., A sperm factor affecting the receptivity ofDrosophila melanogaster females. Nature194 (1962) 252–253.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Markow, T. A., and Ankney, P. F.,Drosophila males contribute to oogenesis in multiple mating species. Science224 (1984) 302–303.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Menn, J. J., and Hollingworth, R. M., Insect control, 1. Introduction, in: Comparative Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, vol. 12, pp. 1–8. Eds. G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moshitzky, P., Fleischmann, I., Saudan, P., Klauser, S., Kubli, E., and Applebaum, S. W., Sex-peptide activates juvenile hormone biosynthesis in theDrosophila melanogaster corpus allatum. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 32. Wiley-Liss Inc. USA 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mosma, S. A., and Wolfner, M., Structure and expression of aDrosophila male accessory gland gene whose product resembles a peptide pheromone precursor. Genes Dev.2 (1988) 1063–1073.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mosma, S. A., Harada, H. A., and Wolfner, M., Synthesis of twoDrosophila male accessory gland proteins and their fate after transfer to the female during mating. Dev. Biol.142 (1990) 465–475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ohashi, Y. Y., Haino-Fukushima, K., and Fuyama, Y., Purification and characterization of an ovulation stimulating substance from the male accessory gland ofDrosophila suzukii. Insect Biochem.21 (1991) 413–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Osanai, M., Aigaki, T., Kasuga, H., and Yonezawa, Y., Role of arginase transferred from the vesicula seminalis during mating and changes in amino acid pools of the spermatophore after ejaculation in the silkworm,Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem.16 (1986) 879–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Patridge, L., Fowler, K., Trevitt, S., and Sharp, W., An examination of the effects of males on the survival and egg-production rates of femaleDrosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol.32 (1986) 925–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Patridge, L., Green, A., and Fowler, K., Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol.33 (1987) 745–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Reding, T. V., Proteinmuster der Paragoniendrüsen von Hybridmännchen der SchwesterartenDrosophila melanogaster undDrosophila simulans. Diplomarbeit, Universität Zürich 1985.

  51. Rose, M. R., Laboratory evolution of postpond senescence inDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution38 (1984) 1004–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rosen, D., Biological control, in: Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, vol. 12, Insect Control, 414–464. Eds G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schmidt, T., Stumm-Zollinger, and Chen, P. S., Protein metabolism ofDrosophila melanogaster male accessory gland—III. Stimulation of protein synthesis following copulation. Insect Biochem.15 (1985) 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Schmidt, T., Stumm-Zollinger, E., Chen, P. S., Böhlen, P., and Stone, S. R., A male accessory gland peptide with protease inhibitory activity inDrosophila funebris. J. biol. Chem.264 (1989) 9745–9749.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schmidt, T., Choffat, Y., Klauser, S., and Kubli, E., TheDrosophila melanogaster sex peptide: a molecular analysis of structure-function relationships. J. Insect Physiol.39 (1993a) 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Schmidt, T., Choffat, Y., Schneider, M., Hunziker, P., Fumaya, Y., and Kubli, E.,Drosophila suzukii contains a peptide homologous to theDrosophila melanogaster sex-peptide and functional in both species. Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol.23 (1993b) 571–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Spencer, J. L., Bush, G. L., Keller, J. E., and Miller, J. R., Modification of female onion fly,Delia antiqua (Meigen) reproductive behavior by paragonial gland extracts (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). J. Insect Behavior5 (1992) 689–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Stumm-Zollinger, E., and Chen, P. S., Protein metabolism ofDrosophila male accessory glands.—I. Characterization of secretory proteins. Insect Biochem.15 (1985) 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Stumm-Zollinger, E., and Chen, P. S., Gene expression of male accessory glands of interspecific hybrids ofDrosophila. J. Insect Physiol.34 (1988) 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Styger, D., Molekulare Analyse des Sexpeptidgens ausDrosophila melanogaster. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Zürich, Zürich 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Szabad, J., and Fajszi, C., Control of female reproduction inDrosophila: Genetic dissection of using gynandromorphs. Genetics100 (1989) 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J., The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tompkins, L., Genetic analysis of sex appeal inDrosophila. Behav. Genetics14 (1984) 411–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tompkins, L., Genetic control of sexual behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. Trends Gen. (TIG)2 (1986) 14–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tompkins, L., The development of male- and female-specific sexual behavior inDrosophila melanogaster, in: Genetics of Development and Evolution. Eds R. N. Chatterjee and P. Gergen, in press.

  66. Tompkins, L., and Hall, J. C., Identification of brain sites controlling female receptivity in mosaics ofDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics103 (1983) 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wahlen, M., and Wilson, T. G., Variation and genomic localization of genes encodingDrosophila melanogaster male accessory gland proteins separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Genetics114 (1986) 77–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wehner, R., and Gehring, W., Zoologie. Geor Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart and New York 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wolfner, M. F., Tokens of love: function and regulation ofDrosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem. and molec. Bio. (in preparation).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Zoology, University of Zürich, CH-8057, Zürich, (Switzerland)

    P. S. Chen

Authors
  1. P. S. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, P.S. The accessory gland proteins in maleDrosophila: structural, reproductive, and evolutionary aspects. Experientia 52, 503–510 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969718

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969718

Key words

Search

Navigation