Skip to main content
Log in

Are host plants important in pheromone-mediated mating systems of lepidoptera?

  • Multi-Author Review
  • Insect Chemical Ecology
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The role of host plants in the synthesis and release of lepidopteran sex pheromones is examined. Females synthesise pheromones de novo and pheromone quality is not markedly influenced by larval food sources. However, host plants may have a significant effect on different physiological and behavioural parameters associated with pheromone production. Males in some species of Nymphalidae and Arctiidae use secondary plant compounds, such as pyrrolizidine alkaloids, as a pheromone precursor. In such cases these plant compounds serve an additional role, such as protection against predation, and may reflect potential male reproductive investment. In the one instance where the effect of larval host plants on the de novo synthesis of a male sex pheromone was examined, larval nutrition did not alter either the quality or quantity of the hairpencil contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arthur, A. P., and Bauer, D. J., Evidence of the northerly dispersal of the sunflower moth by warm winds. Envir. Ent.10 (1981) 528–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boppré, M., Insects pharmacophagously utilizing defensive plant chemicals (pyrrolizidine alkaloids). Naturwissenschaften73 (1980) 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boppré, M., and Schneider, D., Pyrrolizidine alkaloids quantitatively regulate both scent organ morphogenesis and pheromone biosynthesis in maleCreatonotus moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J. comp. Physiol. A157 (1985) 569–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, K. S. Jr, Adult-obtained pyrrolizidine alkaloids defend ithomiine butterflies against a spider predator. Nature309 (1984) 707–709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardé, R. T., and Taschenberg, E. F., A reinvestigation of the role of (E)-2-hexenal in female calling behaviour of the polyphemus moth (Antheraea polyphemus). J. Insect Physiol.30 (1984) 109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clearwater, J. R., Pheromone metabolism in malePseudaletia separata (Walk.) andMamestra configurata (Walk.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol.50B (1975) 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conner, W. E., Eisner, T., Vander Meer, R. K., Guerrero, A., Ghiringelli, D., and Meinwald, J., Sex attractant of an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): a pulsed chemical signal. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.7 (1980) 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Conner, W. E., Eisner, T., Vander Meer, R. K., Guerrero, A., Ghiringelli, D., and Meinwald, J. Precopulatory sexual interaction in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): role of a pheromone derived from dietary alkaloids. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.9 (1981) 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Delisle, J., and McNeil, J. N., The combined effect of photoperiod and temperature on the calling behaviour of the true armyworm,Pseudaletia unipuncta. Physiol. Ent.12 (1987) 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Delisle, J., and McNeil, J. N., Calling behaviour and pheromone titre of the true armywormPseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under different temperature and photoperiodic conditions. J. Insect Physiol.33 (1987) 315–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Delisle, J., McNeil, J. N., Underhill, E. W. and Barton, D.,helianthus annuus pollen, an oviposition stimulant for the sunflower moth,Homoeosoma electellum. Ent. exp. appl. (1989) in press.

  12. DePew, L. J., Sunflower moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): oviposition and chemical control of larvae on sunflowers. J. econ. Ent.76 (1983) 1164–1166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dussourd, D. E., Ubik, K., Harvis, C., Resch, J., Meinwald, J., and Eisner, T., Biparental defensive endowment of eggs with acquired plant alkaloid in the mothUtetheisa ornatrix. Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA.85 (1988) 5992–5996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eisner, T., and Meinwald, J., Alkaloid-derived pheromones and sexual selection in Lepidoptera, in: Pheromone Biochemistry, pp. 251–269. Eds G. D. Prestwich and G. J. Blomquist. Academic Press, New York 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feeny, P., Rosenberry, L., and Carter, M., Chemical aspects of oviposition behavior in butterflies, in: Herbivorous Insects, pp. 27–76. Ed. S. Ahmad. Academic Press, New York 1983.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzpatrick, S. M., and McNeil, J. N., Male scent in lepidopteran communication: the role of male pheromone ofPseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in: Paths from a Viewpoint: the Wellington Festschrift on Insect Ecology. Mem. ent. Soc. Can.146 (in press).

  17. Fitzpatrick, S. M., Miller, D., Weatherston, I., and McNeil, J. N., Determining pheromone content of hairpencils from individual virgin males ofPseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. chem. Ecol.11 (1985) 207–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitzpatrick, S. M., McNeil, J. N., and Miller, D., Age-specific titer and antennal perception of acetic acid, a component of malePseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) hairpencil secretion. J. chem. Ecol. (1989) in press.

  19. Gilbert, L. E., Pollen feeding and reproductive biology ofHeliconius butterflies. Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA69 (1972) 1403–1407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Grant, G. G., Brady, E. U., and Brand, J. M., Male armyworm scent brush secretion: identification and electroantennogram study of major components. Ann. ent. Soc. Am.65 (1972) 1224–1227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanson, F. E., The behavioral and neurophysiological basis of food plant selection by lepidopterous larvae, in: Herbivorous Insects pp. 3–23. Ed. S. Ahmad. Academic Press, New York 1983.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Hendrikse, A., and Vos-Bunnemeyer, E., Role of host-plant stimuli in sexual behaviour of small ermine moths (Yponomeuta). Ecol. Ent.12 (1987) 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hendry, L. b., Wichmann, J. K., Hindenlang, D. M., Mumma, R. O., and Anderson, M. E., Evidence for origin of insect sex pheromones: presence in food plants. Science188 (1975) 59–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Herrebout, W. M., and van de Water, T. P. M., The effect of the hostplant on pheromone communication in a small ermine moth,Yponomeuta cagnagellus (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent47 (1982) 503–509.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hill, A. S., and Roelofs, W., A female-produced sex pheromone component and attractant for males in the armyworm moth,Pseudaletia unipuncta. Ann. ent. Soc. Am.9 (1980) 408–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Linskens, H. F., and Schrauwen, J., The release of free amino acids from germinating pollen. Acta bot. Neerl.18 (1969) 605–614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McNeil, J. N., Calling behavior: can it be used to identify migratory species of moths? Flo. Ent.69 (1986) 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, J. R., Baker, T. C., Cardé, R. T., and Roelofs, W. L., Reinvestigation of oak leaf roller sex pheromone components and the hypothesis that they vary with diet. Science192 (1976) 140–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Raina, A. K., Host plant, hormone interaction and sex pheromone production and release inHeliothis species, in: Endocrinological Frontiers in Physiological Insect Ecology, pp. 33–36. Eds F. Sehnal, A. Zabza and D. L. Denlinger. Wroclaw Technical University Press, Wroclaw 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riddiford, L. M., Trans-2-hexenal: mating stimulant for polyphemus moths. Science158 (1967) 139–141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Riddiford, L. M., and Williams, C. M., Volatile principle from oak leaves: role in sex life of the polyphemus moths. Science155 (1967) 589–590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rossiter, M., Gershenzon, J., and Mabry, T. J., Behavioral and growth responses of specialist herbivore,Homoeosoma electellum, to major terpenoid of its host,Helianthus spp. J. chem. Ecol.12 (1986) 1505–1521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schneider, D., Boppré, M., Zweig, J., Horsley, S. B., Bell, T. W., Meinwald, J., Hansen, K., and Diehl, E. W., Scent organ development inCreatonotos moths: regulation by pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Science215 (1982) 1264–1265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stanley, R. G., and Linskens, H. F., Protein diffusion from germinating pollen. Physiol. Plant.18 (1965) 47–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Teetes, G. L., and Randolph, N. M., Chemical and cultural control of the sunflower moth in Texas. J. econ. Ent.62 (1969) 1444–1447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Turgeon, J., and McNeil, J., Calling behavior of the armywormPseudaletia unipuncta. Ent. exp. appl.31 (1982) 402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Turgeon, J. J., and McNeil, J. N., Modifications in the calling behaviour ofPseudaletia unipuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) induced by temperature conditions during pupal and adult development. Can. Ent.115 (1983) 1015–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Turgeon, J. J., McNeil, J. N., and Roelofs, W. L., Responsiveness ofpseudaletia unipuncta males to the female sex pheromone. Physiol. Ent.8 (1983) 339–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNeil, J.N., Delisle, J. Are host plants important in pheromone-mediated mating systems of lepidoptera?. Experientia 45, 236–240 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01951809

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01951809

Key words

Navigation