Summary
The role of host plants in the synthesis and release of lepidopteran sex pheromones is examined. Females synthesise pheromones de novo and pheromone quality is not markedly influenced by larval food sources. However, host plants may have a significant effect on different physiological and behavioural parameters associated with pheromone production. Males in some species of Nymphalidae and Arctiidae use secondary plant compounds, such as pyrrolizidine alkaloids, as a pheromone precursor. In such cases these plant compounds serve an additional role, such as protection against predation, and may reflect potential male reproductive investment. In the one instance where the effect of larval host plants on the de novo synthesis of a male sex pheromone was examined, larval nutrition did not alter either the quality or quantity of the hairpencil contents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, A. P., and Bauer, D. J., Evidence of the northerly dispersal of the sunflower moth by warm winds. Envir. Ent.10 (1981) 528–533.
Boppré, M., Insects pharmacophagously utilizing defensive plant chemicals (pyrrolizidine alkaloids). Naturwissenschaften73 (1980) 17–26.
Boppré, M., and Schneider, D., Pyrrolizidine alkaloids quantitatively regulate both scent organ morphogenesis and pheromone biosynthesis in maleCreatonotus moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J. comp. Physiol. A157 (1985) 569–577.
Brown, K. S. Jr, Adult-obtained pyrrolizidine alkaloids defend ithomiine butterflies against a spider predator. Nature309 (1984) 707–709.
Cardé, R. T., and Taschenberg, E. F., A reinvestigation of the role of (E)-2-hexenal in female calling behaviour of the polyphemus moth (Antheraea polyphemus). J. Insect Physiol.30 (1984) 109–112.
Clearwater, J. R., Pheromone metabolism in malePseudaletia separata (Walk.) andMamestra configurata (Walk.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol.50B (1975) 77–82.
Conner, W. E., Eisner, T., Vander Meer, R. K., Guerrero, A., Ghiringelli, D., and Meinwald, J., Sex attractant of an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): a pulsed chemical signal. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.7 (1980) 55–63.
Conner, W. E., Eisner, T., Vander Meer, R. K., Guerrero, A., Ghiringelli, D., and Meinwald, J. Precopulatory sexual interaction in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): role of a pheromone derived from dietary alkaloids. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.9 (1981) 227–235.
Delisle, J., and McNeil, J. N., The combined effect of photoperiod and temperature on the calling behaviour of the true armyworm,Pseudaletia unipuncta. Physiol. Ent.12 (1987) 157–164.
Delisle, J., and McNeil, J. N., Calling behaviour and pheromone titre of the true armywormPseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under different temperature and photoperiodic conditions. J. Insect Physiol.33 (1987) 315–324.
Delisle, J., McNeil, J. N., Underhill, E. W. and Barton, D.,helianthus annuus pollen, an oviposition stimulant for the sunflower moth,Homoeosoma electellum. Ent. exp. appl. (1989) in press.
DePew, L. J., Sunflower moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): oviposition and chemical control of larvae on sunflowers. J. econ. Ent.76 (1983) 1164–1166.
Dussourd, D. E., Ubik, K., Harvis, C., Resch, J., Meinwald, J., and Eisner, T., Biparental defensive endowment of eggs with acquired plant alkaloid in the mothUtetheisa ornatrix. Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA.85 (1988) 5992–5996.
Eisner, T., and Meinwald, J., Alkaloid-derived pheromones and sexual selection in Lepidoptera, in: Pheromone Biochemistry, pp. 251–269. Eds G. D. Prestwich and G. J. Blomquist. Academic Press, New York 1987.
Feeny, P., Rosenberry, L., and Carter, M., Chemical aspects of oviposition behavior in butterflies, in: Herbivorous Insects, pp. 27–76. Ed. S. Ahmad. Academic Press, New York 1983.
Fitzpatrick, S. M., and McNeil, J. N., Male scent in lepidopteran communication: the role of male pheromone ofPseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in: Paths from a Viewpoint: the Wellington Festschrift on Insect Ecology. Mem. ent. Soc. Can.146 (in press).
Fitzpatrick, S. M., Miller, D., Weatherston, I., and McNeil, J. N., Determining pheromone content of hairpencils from individual virgin males ofPseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. chem. Ecol.11 (1985) 207–215.
Fitzpatrick, S. M., McNeil, J. N., and Miller, D., Age-specific titer and antennal perception of acetic acid, a component of malePseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) hairpencil secretion. J. chem. Ecol. (1989) in press.
Gilbert, L. E., Pollen feeding and reproductive biology ofHeliconius butterflies. Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA69 (1972) 1403–1407.
Grant, G. G., Brady, E. U., and Brand, J. M., Male armyworm scent brush secretion: identification and electroantennogram study of major components. Ann. ent. Soc. Am.65 (1972) 1224–1227.
Hanson, F. E., The behavioral and neurophysiological basis of food plant selection by lepidopterous larvae, in: Herbivorous Insects pp. 3–23. Ed. S. Ahmad. Academic Press, New York 1983.
Hendrikse, A., and Vos-Bunnemeyer, E., Role of host-plant stimuli in sexual behaviour of small ermine moths (Yponomeuta). Ecol. Ent.12 (1987) 363–371.
Hendry, L. b., Wichmann, J. K., Hindenlang, D. M., Mumma, R. O., and Anderson, M. E., Evidence for origin of insect sex pheromones: presence in food plants. Science188 (1975) 59–62.
Herrebout, W. M., and van de Water, T. P. M., The effect of the hostplant on pheromone communication in a small ermine moth,Yponomeuta cagnagellus (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent47 (1982) 503–509.
Hill, A. S., and Roelofs, W., A female-produced sex pheromone component and attractant for males in the armyworm moth,Pseudaletia unipuncta. Ann. ent. Soc. Am.9 (1980) 408–411.
Linskens, H. F., and Schrauwen, J., The release of free amino acids from germinating pollen. Acta bot. Neerl.18 (1969) 605–614.
McNeil, J. N., Calling behavior: can it be used to identify migratory species of moths? Flo. Ent.69 (1986) 78–84.
Miller, J. R., Baker, T. C., Cardé, R. T., and Roelofs, W. L., Reinvestigation of oak leaf roller sex pheromone components and the hypothesis that they vary with diet. Science192 (1976) 140–143.
Raina, A. K., Host plant, hormone interaction and sex pheromone production and release inHeliothis species, in: Endocrinological Frontiers in Physiological Insect Ecology, pp. 33–36. Eds F. Sehnal, A. Zabza and D. L. Denlinger. Wroclaw Technical University Press, Wroclaw 1988.
Riddiford, L. M., Trans-2-hexenal: mating stimulant for polyphemus moths. Science158 (1967) 139–141.
Riddiford, L. M., and Williams, C. M., Volatile principle from oak leaves: role in sex life of the polyphemus moths. Science155 (1967) 589–590.
Rossiter, M., Gershenzon, J., and Mabry, T. J., Behavioral and growth responses of specialist herbivore,Homoeosoma electellum, to major terpenoid of its host,Helianthus spp. J. chem. Ecol.12 (1986) 1505–1521.
Schneider, D., Boppré, M., Zweig, J., Horsley, S. B., Bell, T. W., Meinwald, J., Hansen, K., and Diehl, E. W., Scent organ development inCreatonotos moths: regulation by pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Science215 (1982) 1264–1265.
Stanley, R. G., and Linskens, H. F., Protein diffusion from germinating pollen. Physiol. Plant.18 (1965) 47–53.
Teetes, G. L., and Randolph, N. M., Chemical and cultural control of the sunflower moth in Texas. J. econ. Ent.62 (1969) 1444–1447.
Turgeon, J., and McNeil, J., Calling behavior of the armywormPseudaletia unipuncta. Ent. exp. appl.31 (1982) 402–408.
Turgeon, J. J., and McNeil, J. N., Modifications in the calling behaviour ofPseudaletia unipuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) induced by temperature conditions during pupal and adult development. Can. Ent.115 (1983) 1015–1022.
Turgeon, J. J., McNeil, J. N., and Roelofs, W. L., Responsiveness ofpseudaletia unipuncta males to the female sex pheromone. Physiol. Ent.8 (1983) 339–344.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McNeil, J.N., Delisle, J. Are host plants important in pheromone-mediated mating systems of lepidoptera?. Experientia 45, 236–240 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01951809
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01951809