Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A microscale device for measuring emissions from materials for indoor use

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emission test chambers or cells are used to determine organic vapour emissions from construction products under controlled conditions. Polymeric car trim component emissions are typically evaluated using direct thermal desorption/extraction. The Microchamber/Thermal Extractor (μ-CTE, Markes International) was developed to provide both a complementary tool for rapid screening of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions—suitable for industrial quality control—and a means for thermal extraction of larger, more representative samples of car trim components. To determine the degree of correlation between conventional emission test methods and the microchamber, experiments were carried out under different conditions of temperature, air change rate and sample conditioning time. Good quantitative and qualitative correlation was obtained for measurements at ambient temperature. Moreover, it was shown that ambient-temperature emissions data collected using the μ-CTE as rapidly as possible—i.e. with minimal or no sample conditioning time—nevertheless provided a reliable guide as to how well that material would perform in subsequent 3-day chamber tests of VOC emissions. The parameters found to have the greatest influence on data correlation for experiments carried out at elevated temperatures were the sample mass (for bulk emissions testing) and the conditioning time. The results also showed that, within the constraints of inherent sample homogeneity, the μ-CTE gave reproducible emissions data, despite its small sample size/capacity relative to that of conventional chambers. Preliminary results of modelling the air flow within a microchamber using computational fluid dynamics showed a high degree of turbulent flow and two potential areas of still air which could cause sink effects. However, the experimental data reported here and in previous studies showed enhanced recovery of semivolatile components from the μ-CTE relative to a recovery from a 1 m3 conventional chamber. This indicates that if these areas of relatively still air are present within the microchamber, they do not appear to be significant in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The boiling points of the compounds used were 80 °C (C-I), 198 °C (C-II) and 310 °C (C-III). The particular compounds are not allowed to be mentioned by the authors because they are used for quality assurance in our laboratory.

References

  1. Brasche S, Bischof W (2005) Int J Hyg Environ Health 208:247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson J, Nelson WC (1995) National human activity pattern survey data base, USEPA

  3. World Health Organization (1989) Indoor air quality: organic pollutants. EURO reports and studies no. 111. World Health Organization, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Communities (1997) ECA-report no. 19: Total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) in indoor air quality investigations. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mølhave L, Clausen G, Berglund B, De Ceaurriz J, Kettrup A, Lindvall T, Maroni M, Pickering AC, Risse U, Rothweiler H, Seifert B, Younes M (1997) Indoor Air 7:225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DIN EN ISO 16017-1 (2000) Beuth, Berlin

  7. European Commission (1989) Indoor air quality and its impact on man. Report no 2. European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singer BC, Coleman BK, Destaillats H, Hodgson AT, Lunden MM, Weschler CJ, Nazaroff WW (2006) Environ Sci Technol 40:4421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Albrectsen O (1988) Proc Healthy Buildings 1988, Stockholm 3:25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Uhde E (1998) PhD thesis, Technical University Braunschweig

  11. Meyer U, Möhle K, Eyerer P, Maresch L (1994) Staub—Reinhalt Luft 54:137

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gunnarsen L, Nielsen PA, Wolkoff P (1993) Proc Indoor Air 2:507

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gunnarsen L, Nielsen PA, Nielsen JB, Wolkoff P, Knudsen H, Thøgersen K (1993) Proc Indoor Air 2:501

    Google Scholar 

  14. DIN EN ISO 16000-10 (2006) Beuth, Berlin

  15. ASTM D7143-05 (2005) ASTM book of standards 11.03

  16. Scherer C, Schmohl A, Breuer K (2006) Proc Healthy Buildings 4:29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scherer C, Schmohl A, Breuer K, Sedlbauer K, Salthammer T, Schripp T, Uhde E, Wensing M (2006) Gefahrstoffe—Reinhalt Luft 66:87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uhde E, Salthammer T (2006) Indoor Air 16:158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DIN EN ISO 16000-9 (2006) Beuth, Berlin

  20. German Association of the Automotive Industry (2005) Recommendation VDA 276

  21. Müller B (2002) Fortschritt-Bericht VDI Reihe 15 no 242

  22. Schripp T, Uhde E, Wensing M, Salthammer T (2006) Proc Healthy Buildings 4:23

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tapeten-Gütesicherung RAL-GZ 479 11. (2002) Beuth, Berlin

  24. Meininghaus R, Fuhrmann F, Salthammer T (1996) Fresenius’ J Anal Chem 356:344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Uhde E, Bednarek M, Fuhrmann F, Salthammer T (2001) Indoor Air 11:150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Salthammer T, Schriever E, Marutzky R (1993) Toxicol Environ Chem 40:121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Umweltbundesamt (2005) AgBB evaluation scheme. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de

  28. Greim H (2002) Gesundheitsschädliche Arbeitsstoffe. Toxikologisch-arbeitsmedizinische Begründungen von MAK-Werten. Wiley, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ritter EJ, Scott WJ Jr, Randall JL, Ritter JM (1987) Teratology 35:41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. DIN EN ISO 16000-11 (2006) Beuth, Berlin

  31. German Association of the Automotive Industry(2002) Recommendation 278

  32. Geller S, Krafczyk M, Tölke J, Turek S, Hron J (2006) Comput Fluids 35:888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. d’Humi’eres D, Ginzburg I, Krafczyk M, Lallemand P, Luo LS (2002) Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 360:437

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge support by Markes International. This work was supported financially by the research project “Development of a simplified test method for the characterisation of chemical and sensory emissions” of the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. The authors thank Elizabeth Woolfenden and Hubertus Wichmann for valuable comments and careful revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Salthammer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schripp, T., Nachtwey, B., Toelke, J. et al. A microscale device for measuring emissions from materials for indoor use. Anal Bioanal Chem 387, 1907–1919 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-1057-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-1057-2

Keywords

Navigation