Skip to main content
Log in

Performance and selectivity of polymeric pseudostationary phases for the electrokinetic separation of amino acid derivatives and peptides

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two polymeric pseudostationary phases, one an acrylamide polymer and the second a siloxane polymer, have been investigated for the separation of naphthalene-2,3-dicarboxaldehyde (NDA)-derivatized amino acids and small peptides. The dervatized amino acids were detected by UV absorbance and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) detection. The polymers provided very high efficiency and good selectivity for the separation of the amino acids. The separation selectivity using the polymers was significantly different from that of SDS micelles, and there were subtle differences in selectivities between the polymers. Although very good detection limits were obtained with LIF detection, a significant background signal was observed when the polymers were not washed to remove fluorescent impurities. The polymers did not separate the peptides very well. It is postulated that the fixed covalent structure of the polymers prevents them from interacting strongly or efficiently with the peptides, which are large in relation to the analytes typically separated by electrokinetic chromatography using polymers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–b
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3
Fig. 4A–C

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palmer CP (2000) Electrophoresis 21:4054–4072

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maichel B, Kenndler E (2000) Electrophoresis 21:3160–3173

    Google Scholar 

  3. Palmer CP (2002) Electrophoresis 23:3993–4004

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peric I, Kenndler E (2003) Electrophoresis 24:2924–2934

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palmer CP, McCarney JP (2004) J Chromatogr A 1044:159–176

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palmer CP, McCarney JP (2004) Electrophoresis 25:4086–4094

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith JT (1999) Electrophoresis 20:3078–3083

    Google Scholar 

  8. Prata C, Bonnafous P, Fraysse N, Treilhou M, Poinsot V, Couderc F (2001) Electrophoresis 22:4129–4138

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poinsot V, Bayle C, Couderc F (2003) Electrophoresis 24:4047–4062

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kasicka V (1999) Electrophoresis 20:3084–3105

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kasicka V (2001) Electrophoresis 22:4139–4162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasicka V (2003) Electrophoresis 24:4013–4046

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peterson DS, Palmer CP (2001) Electrophoresis 22:1314–1321

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schulte S, Palmer CP (2003) Electrophoresis 24:978–983

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi W, Peterson DS, Palmer CP (2001) J Chromatogr A 924:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shi W, Watson CJ, Palmer CP (2001) J Chromatogr A 905:281–290

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shi W, Palmer CP (2002) Electrophoresis 23:1285–1295

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher P. Palmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulte, S., Singh, A.K., Rauk, E. et al. Performance and selectivity of polymeric pseudostationary phases for the electrokinetic separation of amino acid derivatives and peptides. Anal Bioanal Chem 382, 777–782 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3131-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3131-6

Keywords

Navigation