Considering nonlocality in the optical potentials within eikonal models

C. Hebborn and F. M. Nunes
Phys. Rev. C 104, 034624 – Published 24 September 2021

Abstract

Background: For its simplicity, the eikonal method is the tool of choice to analyze nuclear reactions at high energies (E>100 MeV/nucleon), including knockout reactions. However, so far, the effective interactions used in this method are assumed to be fully local.

Purpose: Given the recent studies on nonlocal optical potentials, in this work we assess whether nonlocality in the optical potentials is expected to impact reactions at high energies and then explore different avenues for extending the eikonal method to include nonlocal interactions.

Method: We compare angular distributions obtained for nonlocal interactions (using the exact R-matrix approach for elastic scattering and the adiabatic distorted wave approximation for transfer) with those obtained using their local-equivalent interactions.

Results: Our results show that transfer observables are significantly impacted by nonlocality in the high-energy regime. Because knockout reactions are dominated by stripping (transfer to inelastic channels), nonlocality is expected to have a large effect on knockout observables too. Three approaches are explored for extending the eikonal method to nonlocal interactions, including an iterative method and a perturbation theory.

Conclusions: None of the derived extensions of the eikonal model provide a good description of elastic scattering. This paper suggests that nonlocality removes the formal simplicity associated with the eikonal model.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 28 May 2021
  • Accepted 14 September 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034624

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

C. Hebborn1,2,* and F. M. Nunes3,4,†

  • 1Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 2Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, L-414, Livermore, California 94551, USA
  • 3National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1321, USA

  • *hebborn@frib.msu.edu
  • nunes@nscl.msu.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 3 — September 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×