Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring Livelihood Sustainability by PCA in Indian Sundarban

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable livelihoods can cope with and recover from stress and can maintain or improve its resources and properties. We have adopted an integrated approach to measure livelihood sustainability for Indian Sundarban through the composite livelihood sustainability index incorporating natural, human, physical, and socio-economic dimensions. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a systematic and reliable quantitative method for measuring composite score. The livelihood sustainability performances of 19 blocks of Sundarban are measured, benchmarked, and ranked. PCA-based CLSI acts as a comprehensive analytical method for evaluating the spatial variation and indicator of strength and weakness in livelihood sustainability. Moreover, it may assist local authorities in implementing any policy or project more feasibly to ensure livelihood sustainability in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aazami, M., & Shanazi, K. (2020). Tourism wetlands and rural sustainable livelihood: The case from Iran. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 30, 100284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, N. (2007). Integrated aquaculture-agriculture systems in Bangladesh: Potential for sustainable livelihoods and nutritional security of the rural poor. Aquaculture Asia, 12, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocklesby, M. A. (2003). Community development in sustainable livelihoods approaches—An introduction. Community Development Journal, 38, 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/38.3.185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22(9), 1253–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Qiu, Z., Usio, N., & Nakamura, K. (2018). Tourism’s impacts on rural livelihood in the sustainability of an aging community in Japan. Sustainability, 10(8), 2896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantin, C. (2014). Principal component analysis-a powerful tool in computing marketing information. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov Economic Sciences Series V, 7(2), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Y.J., Hens, L., Zhu, Y. G., & Zhao, J. (2004). Environmental sustainability index of Shandong Province, China. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 11, 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, C., & Mandal, R. (2016). Coastal people and mangroves ecosystem resources vis-à-vis management strategies in Indian sundarban. Ocean & Coastal Management, 134, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable development, 19(5), 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • District Census Handbook North Twenty Four Parganas. (2011). Directorate Of Census Operations West Bengal. Retrieved from October 17, 2020 from https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/19/1911_PART_A_DCHB_NORTH%20TWENTY%20FOUR%20PARGANAS.pdf; https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/1911_PART_B_DCHB_NORTH%20TWENTY%20FOUR%20PARGANAS.pdf.

  • District Census Handbook South Twenty Four Parganas. (2011). Directorate Of Census Operations West Bengal. Retrieved from October 17, 2020 from https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/19/1917_PART_A_DCHB_SOUTH%20TWENTY%20FOUR%20PARGANAS.pdf; https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/1917_PART_B_DCHB_SOUTH%20TWENTY%20FOUR%20PARGANAS.pdf

  • District Human Development. Report, North Twenty Four Parganas. (2010). Development & Planning Department, Government of West Bengal. Retrieved from October 17, 2020 from http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/24%20pgs%20north.pdf

  • District Human Development. Report, South Twenty Four Parganas. (2009). Development & Planning Department, Government of West Bengal. Retrieved from October 17, 2020 from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/india/docs/hdr_south24_parganas_2009_full_report.pdf

  • District Statistical Handbook. (2011). Bureau of Applied Economics and Statistics. Department of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of West Bengal.

  • Elliott, P., & Wartenberg, D. (2004). Spatial epidemiology: Current approaches and future challenges. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(9), 998–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & Sherbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship (pp. 47–60). New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everard, M., Kataria, G., Kumar, S., & Gupta, N. (2020). Assessing livelihood-ecosystem interdependencies and natural resource governance in a tribally controlled region of India’s north-eastern Middle Himalayas. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–19.

  • Garai, S., Ghosh, M., Maiti, S., Garai, S., Meena, B., Dutta, T., & Kadian, K. (2019). Development and application of dairy-based sustainable livelihood security index in the districts of West Bengal, India: A tool for dairy development planning. Journal of Rural Studies.

  • Gebrekidan Abbay, A., Rutten, R., Azadi, H., & Witlox, F. (2019). How social status contributes to sustainable livelihoods? An empirical analysis in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 11(1), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., & Chattopadhyay, K. S. (2017). A study on indigenous rice varieties in Sundarban Delta and their role in ensuring local food security in the face of climate change threats. Santiniketan: Agro-Economic Research Centre, Visva-Bharati. http://www.visvabharati.ac.in/file/Summary-184.pdf

  • Gibbes, C., Hopkins, A. L., Díaz, A. I., & Jimenez-Osornio, J. (2020). Defining and measuring sustainability: A systematic review of studies in rural Latin America and the Caribbean. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(1), 447–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, M. M., & Garg, I. (2018). Construction of health infrastructure index in Haryana: An econometric approach. Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies, 9(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.15415/jtmge.2018.91005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, J., Prout, S., Tonts, M., & Ali, S. H. (2015). Sustainable livelihoods and indicators for regional development in mining economies. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2(2), 368–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossein, M. H. S. K. (2011). Dynamic sustainability assessment of countries at the macro level: A principal component analysis. Ecological Indicators, 11(3), 811–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, A. Z., Hassan, K., Kamarudin, R., & Anuar, A. R. (2018). Measuring sustainable livelihood for Malaysia’s poor: The sustainable livelihoods index and the B40 group of coastal fishermen in northern Peninsular Malaysia. LIFEWAYS-International Journal of Society, Development and Environment in the Developing World, 2(1), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeevamani, J. J. J., Priya, P., Infantina, J. A., Abhilash, K., Behera, D. P., Samuel, V. D., et al. (2021). An integrated approach to assess coastal vulnerability versus fisheries livelihood sustainability: Strategies for climate change adaptation in Sindhudurg, west coast of India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 4011–4042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jollands, N., Lermit, J., & Patterson, M. (2004). Aggregate eco-efficiency indices for New Zealand’a principal components analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 73(4), 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. (2003). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamaruddin, R., & Samsudin, S. (2014). The sustainable livelihoods index: A tool to assess the ability and preparedness of the rural poor in receiving entrepreneurial project. Journal of Social Economics Research, 1, 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, J. (2001). Influencing policy processes for sustainable livelihoods: Strategies for change lessons for change in policy & organisations, no. 2 (Vol. 4). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Marcouiller, D. W. (2020). Rural prospects for resilience: Planning sustainable livelihoods and coping with flood hazards along the US Mississippi River. Society & Natural Resources, 1–20.

  • Koschinsky, J. (2013). The case for spatial analysis in evaluation to reduce health inequities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 36(1), 172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. B. (2013). Statistical Methods in Spatial Epidemiology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Zhang, H., Yuan, C., Liu, Z., & Fan, C. (2012). A PCA-based method for construction of composite sustainability indicators. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(5), 593–603.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Shuai, C., Shuai, Y., Cheng, X., Liu, Y., & Huang, F. (2020). How livelihood assets contribute to sustainable development of smallholder farmers. Journal of International Development, 32(3), 408–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Li, J., Ren, L., Xu, J., Li, C., & Li, S. (2020). Exploring livelihood resilience and its impact on livelihood strategy in rural China. Social Indicators Research, 150, 977–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S. (2001). Book review:“ sustainability indicators: Measuring the immeasurable” by S. Bell and S. Morse, London, UK, Earthscan, 1999. ISBN: 1-85383-498-x. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(2), 171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, R. N., Saenger, P., Das, C. S., & Aziz, A. (2019a). Current Status of Mangrove Forests in the Trans-boundary Sundarbans (pp. 93–131). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00680-8_4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, U. K., Burman, D., Bhardwaj, A., Nayak, D. B., Samui, A., Mullick, S., et al. (2019b). Waterlogging and coastal salinity management through land shaping and cropping intensification in climatically vulnerable Indian Sundarbans. Agricultural Water Management, 216(C), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.01.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A., Gangopadhyay, A., Dube, A., Schmidt, A. C., & Banerjee, K. (2009). Observed changes in water mass properties in the Indian Sundarbans (northwestern Bay of Bengal) during 1980–2007. Current Science, 97, 1445–1452.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muzamhindo, S. (2017). Principal component analysis as a ranking tool—A case of world universities. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(6), 2114–2135. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/4650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, N., & Pramaniik, S. (1994). Crabs and crab fisheries of sundarbans. Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Co-operative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeijer, D., & de Groot, R. S. (2008). Framing environmental indicators: Moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(1), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishat, B. (2019). Landscape narrative of the Sundarban: Towards collaborative management by Bangladesh and India. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norfolk, S. (2004). Examining access to natural resources and linkages to sustainable livelihoods. A case study of Mozambique.

  • Orford, S. (2001). ) Spatial Epidemiology: Methods and Applications: P Elliott, J Wakefield, N Best, D Briggs (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp.494, 65.00. ISBN: 0-19-262941-7. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30(5), 1204–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S., Das, T. K., Pharung, R., Ray, S., Mridha, N., Kalita, N., et al. (2020). Development of an indicator based composite measure to assess livelihood sustainability of shifting cultivation dependent ethnic minorities in the disadvantageous northeastern region of India. Ecological Indicators, 110, 105934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1901). Liii. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11), 559–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, X., & Dang, H. (2018). Addressing the dual challenges of food security and environmental sustainability during rural livelihood transitions in China. Land Use Policy, 77, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, N., & Rogers, P. (2006). Assessment of agricultural sustainability. Current Science, 91, 439–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., Howlett, D., & Woodhouse, P. (2000). A review of indicators of agricultural and rural livelihood sustainability. Centre for Agricultural Food and Resource Economics, University of Manchester.

  • Sarangi, S. K., Maji, B., Singh, S., Burman, D., Mandal, S., Sharma, D. K., et al. (2015). Improved nursery management further enhances the productivity of stress-tolerant rice varieties in coastal rainfed lowlands. Field Crops Research, 174, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathyapriya, E., & Asokhan, M. (2020). A scale to measure attitude of farmers towards agricultural schemes for sustainable livelihood. Journal of Extension Education, 31(3), 6361–6368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72.

  • Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabnam, S. (2012). Spatial inequality in health care infrastructure in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Regional Science, 34(2), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, A., & Andrews, B. (2012) An assessment of weighting methodologies for composite indicators: The case of the index of economic well-being. Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CLS) research report (2012-10)

  • Singh, P. K., & Hiremath, B. (2010). Sustainable livelihood security index in a developing country: A tool for development planning. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 442–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler, R., & Soler, R. (2008). Assessment of aggregated indicators of sustainability using pca: the case of apple trade in Spain. In: 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector, Zurich, pp. 133–414.

  • Speranza, C. I., Wiesmann, U., & Rist, S. (2014). An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics. Global Environmental Change, 28, 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srijuntrapun, P., Fisher, D., & Rennie, H. G. (2018). Assessing the sustainability of tourism-related livelihoods in an urban world heritage site. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 13(5), 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, R. (2008). Impacts of europe’s changing climate-2008 indicator-based assessment. European Environment Agency (EEA): Technical report.

  • Sánchez-Triana, E., Ortolano, L., & Paul, T. (2018). Managing water-related risks in the West Bengal Sundarbans: Policy alternatives and institutions. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2016.1202099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twining-Ward, L., Li, W., Bhammar, H., & Wright, E. (2018). Supporting sustainable livelihoods through wildlife tourism.

  • Williams, K., Burton, E., & Jenks, M. (2000). Achieving sustainable urban form: An introduction. Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, 2000, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., & Fang, Y. (2020). Application of capital-based approach in the measurement of livelihood sustainability: A case study from the Koshi River basin community in Nepal. Ecological Indicators, 116, 106474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Fang, Y., Chen, X., & Congshan, T. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of trends in global sustainable livelihood research. Sustainability, 11(4), 1150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dipanwita De would like to record her gratitude to her family for their encouragement and constant support. Sincere thanks are also extended to Bhaskar De for his help and co-operation in editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Geography, West Bengal State University, Kolkata, 700126, India

    Dipanwita De

  2. Barasat Government College, Kolkata, 700124, India

    Chandan Surabhi Das

Authors
  1. Dipanwita De
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chandan Surabhi Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipanwita De.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De, D., Das, C.S. Measuring Livelihood Sustainability by PCA in Indian Sundarban. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 18424–18442 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01451-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01451-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation