Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T08:13:03.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon Activity Measurements of Oolitic Sediments from the Persian Gulf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Jan Šilar*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon activity of successive parts of Pleistocene and Holocene ooids and mollusk shells from the Persian Gulf, Kuwait, was measured. The inner part of the ooids showed the lowest activity and the cement between grains the highest. Radiocarbon activities correspond to the general stratigraphy and to the position of the sediments. Radiocarbon ages of Pleistocene sediments seem to be very low due to recrystallization of aragonite. Higher radiocarbon activity of cement indicates that atmospheric carbon dioxide was involved in the subaerial diagenetic process. The radiocarbon age of well-preserved mollusk shells seems to be lower than their allegedly Pleistocene geologic age.

Type
Oceanography
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science

References

American Geological Institute, 1972, Glossary of Geology: Washington, DC, 805 p.Google Scholar
Broecker, W S, Gerard, R, Ewing, M, and Heezen, B C, 1960, Natural radiocarbon in the Atlantic Ocean: Jour Geophys Research, v 65, p 29032931.Google Scholar
Evans, G, Murray, J W, Biggs, H E J, Bate, R, and Bush, P R, 1973, The oceanography, ecology, sedimentology and geomorphology of parts of the Trucial coast barrier island complex, Persian Gulf, in Purser, B H, ed, The Persian Gulf: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, p 233277.Google Scholar
Gavish, E and Friedman, G M, 1969, Progressive diagenesis in Quaternary to Late Tertiary carbonate sediments: sequence and time scale: Jour Sed Pet, v 39, p 980-1006.Google Scholar
Land, L S, Mackenzie, F T, and Gould, S J, 1967, Pleistocene History of Bermuda: Geol Soc America Bull, v 78, p 9931006.Google Scholar
Mangerud, J and Gulliksen, Steinar, 1975, Apparent radiocarbon ages of recent marine shells from Norway, Spitsbergen, and Arctic Canada: Quaternary Research, v 5, p 263273.Google Scholar
Martin, E L and Ginsburg, R N, 1965, Radiocarbon ages of oolithic sands of Great Bahama Bank, in Chatters, R M and Olson, E A, eds, Internatl conf on radiocarbon and tritium dating, 6th, Pullman, Washington, Proc: Clearinghouse for Federal and Tech Inf, Natl Bur Standards, US Dept Commerce, Washington, DC, p 705719.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U, 1973, The radiocarbon dating of Ivory Coast shell mounds: West African Jour Archaeol, v 3, p 215220.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U and Blake, Weston Jr., 1962, Problems of radiocarbon dating of raised beaches, based on experiences in Spitsbergen: Norsk geog tidsskr, v 18, nos. 1-2, p 118.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U and Eriksson, K G, 1965, Remarks on 14C dating of shell material in the sediments: Progress in Oceanog, v 3, p 253266.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U, Göksu, Y, and Stenberg, A, 1968, Further investigation of storing and treatment of Foraminifera and molluscs for 14C dating: Geol fören Stockholm förh, v 90, p 417426.Google Scholar
Pícha, Frantisek, 1978, Depositional and diagenetic history of Pleistocene and Holocene oolitic sediments and sabkhas in Kuwait, Persian Gulf: Sedimentology, v 25, p 427450.Google Scholar
Picha, F and Saleh, A A M, 1977, Quaternary sediments in Kuwait: Univ Kuwait Jour (Sci), v 4, p 169185.Google Scholar
Rafter, T A, 1961, Recent developments in the interpretation and reporting of 14C measurements, in Pacific sci cong, 10th, Proc: Honolulu, Hawaii, p 3341.Google Scholar