Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by Rempel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 185501 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 9 January 2003
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.199601
©2003 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by Rempel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 185501 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.199601
©2003 American Physical Society