Dealing with missing data: An inpainting application to the MICROSCOPE space mission

Joel Bergé, Sandrine Pires, Quentin Baghi, Pierre Touboul, and Gilles Métris
Phys. Rev. D 92, 112006 – Published 21 December 2015

Abstract

Missing data are a common problem in experimental and observational physics. They can be caused by various sources, such as an instrument’s saturation, a contamination from an external event, or a data loss. In particular, they can have a disastrous effect when one is seeking to characterize a colored-noise-dominated signal in Fourier space, since they create a spectral leakage that can artificially increase the noise. It is therefore important to either take them into account or to correct for them prior to, e.g., a least-square fit of the signal to be characterized. In this paper, we present an application of the inpainting algorithm to mock MICROSCOPE data. Inpainting is based on a sparsity assumption, and has already been used in various astrophysical contexts; MICROSCOPE is a French Space Agency mission (whose launch is expected in 2016) that aims to test the weak equivalence principle down to the 1015 level. We then explore the inpainting dependence on the number of gaps and the total fraction of missing values. We show that, in a worst-case scenario, after reconstructing missing values with inpainting a least-square fit may allow us to significantly measure a 1.1×1015 equivalence principle violation signal, which is sufficiently close to the MICROSCOPE requirements to implement inpainting in the official MICROSCOPE data processing and analysis pipeline. Together with the previously published KARMA method, inpainting will then allow us to independently characterize and cross-check an equivalence principle violation signal detection down to the 1015 level.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 17 September 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.112006

© 2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Joel Bergé1,*, Sandrine Pires2, Quentin Baghi1, Pierre Touboul1, and Gilles Métris3

  • 1ONERA—The French Aerospace Lab, 29 avenue de la Division Leclerc, 92320 Châtillon, France
  • 2Laboratoire AIM, CEA/DSM–CNRS Université Paris Diderot IRFU/SAp, CEA Saclay Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 3Geoazur (UMR 7329), Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur Bt 4, 250 rue Albert Einstein, Les Lucioles 1, Sophia Antipolis, 06560 Valbonne, France

  • *joel.berge@onera.fr

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 11 — 1 December 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×