Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Insects as indicators of land use in three ecoregions in the Prairie Pothole Region

  • Regular Submissions
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We sampled populations of insects in the prairie pothole region of North Dakota, USA, to determine whether relationships existed between community- or taxon-level indicators and 11 land-use types. Our goal was to determine if agricultural impacts were reflected in measurable differences for insect indicators: abundance, taxa richness, and diversity. Insects were sampled with light traps at 126 wetland basins in three ecoregions. Sampling was conducted three times each year during the spring and early summer of 1995 and 1996. Sites were selected based on the proportion of cropland to grassland, hayland, and Conservation Reserve Program land surrounding wetland basins at 50 and 400 m radii. Other land-use types included in our analyses were woodland, roadways, and five wetland types: permanent, semipermanent, seasonal, temporary, and riverine. In both years, taxa richness, abundance, and diversity were greater for the second (June) and third (July) sampling periods than for the first period (May), and indicators were greater in the Drift Plain and Red River Valley ecoregions than in the Missouri Coteau ecoregion. Our analyses indicated several significant associations between insect indicators and land-use types; however, r2 values were generally low. Much more of the variance in insect measures was explained by temperature, seasonal, and ecoregion effects. Several associations were significant within individual ecoregions (i.e., abundance of aquatic insects. Caenidae, Scarabaeidae, and Lepidoptera and number of Ephemeroptera families). However, no indicators were found in common for all three ecoregions. Several significant associations with land use were identified across all sites (i.e., all ecoregions combined). A small number of the significant relationships found across all sites were related to agricultural land use, and several indicated a negative relationship with grasslands. However, we observed several positive relationships between our insect indicators and riverine wetlands across sites and in the Red River Valley ecoregion for both years and spatial scales (i.e., the abundance of Caenidae, Scarabaeidae, Ceratopogonidae, Hydropsychidae, and Hydroptilidae).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, D. J. 1997. Insects as indicators of wetland condition in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota. M.S. Thesis. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batt, B. D. J., and H. H. Prince. 1979. Laying dates, clutch size and egg weight of captive mallards. Condor 81:34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon, M., J. L. Harper, and C. R. Townsend. 1990. Ecology: individuals, populations, and communities, second edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. W. and E. F. Cook. 1981. The Semiaquatic Hemiptera of Minnesota (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). University of Minnesota Agriculture Experimental Station Technical Bulletin 332.

  • Borror, D. J., C. A. Triplehorn, and N. F. Johnson. 1989. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. 1982. An analysis of factors affecting catches of insects in light-traps. Bulletin of Entomological Research 72:535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M. 1996. Section 2.0, design methods, p. 11–19.In S. A. Peterson, L. Carpenter, G. Guntenspergen, and L. M. Cowardin (eds.) Pilot Test of Wetland Condition Indicators in the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA. EPA/620/R-97/002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M. and S. A. Peterson. 1996. Section 1.0, introduction. p. 1–9.In S. A. Peterson, L. Carpenter, G. Guntenspergen, and L. M. Cowardin (eds.) Pilot Test of Wetland Condition Indicators in the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Corvallis, OR. USA. EPA/620/R-97/002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. E. 1990. Wetland losses in the United States 1780’s to 1980’s. U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. E. and C. E. Johnson. 1991. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, mid-1970’s to mid-1980’s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. B. and A. G. van der Valk. 1978. The decomposition of standing and fallen litter ofTypha glauca andScirpus fluviatilis. Canadian Journal of Botany 56:662–675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, H. F. 1983. Some aspects of major dry and wet periods in the contiguous United States, 1895–1981. Journal of Climate and Applied Metcorology 22:3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, H. F. 1986. An analysis of twentieth century climate fluctuations in northern North America. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 25:1625–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillaha, T. A., R. B. Reneau, S. Mostaghimi, and D. Lee. 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 32:513–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick, D. N. and T. J. Blasing. 1981. A dendroclimatic reconstruction of annual precipitation amounts in Iowa since 1680. Water Resource Research 17:1183–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. M. 1977. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biological Association. Scientific Publication No. 25.

  • Euliss, N. H., Jr. and D. M. Mushet. 1997. Impact of agricultural practices on wetland macroinvertebrates. Final report on pilot test of indicators of wetland condition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss, N. H., Jr., D. A. Wrubleski, and D. M. Mushet. 1999. Wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region—invertebrate species composition, ecology, and management. p. 471–514.In D. P. Batzer, R. B. Rader, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America: ecology and management. John Wiley and Sons. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows, D. P. and T. K. Buhl. 1995. Research access to privately owned wetland basins in the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States. Wetlands 15:330–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, R. A. and N. H. Euliss, Jr. 1998. Sedimentation of prairie wetlands. Great Plains Research 8:97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. D. and R. L. Post. 1965. North Dakota Water Beetles. Publication of the North Dakota State University Agriculture Experimental Station 5:1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntenspergen, G. R. (ed.). 1999. Indicators of wetland condition for the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States. Final report of the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Health and Environmental Effect Research Laboratory, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenhoff, W. L. 1981. Aquatic Insects of Wisconsin. Natural History Council, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Publication No. 2.

  • Hilsenhoff, W. L. 1988. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7:65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. E. 1981. The hydrology of prairie potholes: a selected annotated bibliography. South Dakota Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Brookings, SD, USA. Technical Bulletin, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, L. A. 1969. The Aquatic and Semiaquatic Hemiptera of North Dakota. M.S. Thesis. North Dakota State Universit. Fargo, ND, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, T. R. and A. J. Koscielny. 1982. Drought in the United States: 1895–1981. Journal of Climatology 2:313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl, T. R. and W. E. Riebsame. 1984. The identification of 10 to 20 year temperature and precipitation fluctuations in the contiguous United States. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 23:950–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, R. I., D. E. Hubbard, and D. E. Nomsen. 1985. Wetlands and agriculture. p. 77–82.In Technologies to benefit agriculture and wildlife—workshop proceedings. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology and Assessment, Washington, DC, USA. OTA-BP-F34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoma, J. R. 1985. Twilight in pothole country. Audubon 87(5):67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, G. E. 1974. The Prairie Pothole Region—a zone of environmental opportunity. Naturalist 25(4):2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, J. F., B. V. Peterson, G. E. Shewell, H. J. Teskey, J. R. Vockeroth, and D. M. Wood. 1981. Manual of Nearctic Diptera, Volume 1. Agriculture Canada, Hull, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, G. E., M. W. Johnson, and T. R. Folsom. 1954. A statistical analysis of the performance of the Folsom plankton sample splitter, based upon test observations. Archiv für Meterologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Series A 7:502–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murkin H. R. and D. A. Wrubleski. 1988. Aquatic invertebrates of freshwater wetlands: function and ecology. p. 239–249.In D. D. Hook, W. H. McKee, Jr., H. K. Smith, J. Gregory, V. G. Burrell, Jr., M. R. DeVoe, R. E. Sojka, S. Gilbert, R. Banks, L. H. Stolzy, C. Brooks, T. D. Matthews, and T. H. Shear (eds.) The Ecology and Management of Wetlands, Volume 1. Timber Press, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, R. K. and J. L. Baker. 1989. Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics and the fate of agricultural runoff. p. 92–131.In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairic Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames. IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W. S., D. L. Stevens, and D. White. 1990. Design report for EMAP. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. EPA/600/3 91/053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. A. 1994. The Environmental Monitoring and Assessment: Program (EMAP): Its objectives, approach and status relative to wetlands. p. 181–195.In G. Aubrecht, G. Dick, and C. Prentice (eds.) Monitoring of Ecological Change in Wetlands of Middle Europe. Proceedings of an International Workshop. Linz. Austria. Stapfia 31, Linz, Austria, and IWRB Special Publication Number 30, Slimbridge, U.K.

  • Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross, and R. M. Hughes. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. EPA/444/4-89/001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, E. M. and B. L. Bedford. 1988. Evaluating cumulative effects on wetland functions: a conceptual framework and generic overview. Environmental Management 12:565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H., K. H. Haag, and S. E. Neff. 1975. Community structure and diversity of caddisfly adults from the Salt River, Kentucky. Environmental Entomology 4:241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torric. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biometrical Approach, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. E. and H. A. Kantrud. 1971. Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 92.

  • Swanson, G. A. and H. F. Duebbert. 1989. Wetland habitats of waterfowl in the prairie pothole region. p. 228–267.In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Congress. 1984. Wetlands: their use and regulation. U.S. Congress. Office of Technology and Assessment. Washington, DC, USA. OTA-O-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. National Water Quality Inventory. 1992 Report to Congress. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA EPA/841/R-94/001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usis, J. D. and D. B. McLean. 1986. The caddisflies (Trichoptera) of Stillfork Swamp Nature Preserve, Carroll County, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 86:33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ark, H. and R. Meiswinkel. 1992. Subsampling of large light trap catches ofCulicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 59:183–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. (ed.). 1989. Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, M. R. and C. P. Hawkins. 1996. Effects of sampling area and subsampling procedures on comparisons of taxa richness among streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. W. 1994. Freshwater Marshes: ecology and wildlife management. Third Edition. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentz, W. A. 1988. Functional status of the nation’s wetlands. p. 50–59.In D. D. Hook, W. H. McKee, Jr., H. K. Smith, J. Gregory, V. G. Burrell, Jr., M. R. DeVoe, R. E. Sojka, S. Gilbert, R. Banks, L. H. Stolzy, C. Brooks, T. D. Matthews, and T. H. Shear (eds.) The Ecology and Management of Wetlands, Volume II. Timber Press, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whigham, D. E., C. Chitterling, and B. Palmer. 1988. Impacts of freshwater wetlands on water quality. Environmental Management 12:663–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. B., R. J. Mackay, and I. M. Smith. 1980. Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in temporary pools. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement 58:97–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T. C. 1989. Hydrologic studies of wetlands in the northern prairie. p. 16–54.In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. David J. Anderson

    Present address: Montrose Area Fisheries, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 7372 State Highway 25 SW, 55363, Montrose, Minnesota, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Avenue, 55108, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

    David J. Anderson

  2. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Avenue, 55108, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

    Bruce Vondracek

Authors
  1. David J. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce Vondracek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, D.J., Vondracek, B. Insects as indicators of land use in three ecoregions in the Prairie Pothole Region. Wetlands 19, 648–664 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161702

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161702

Key Words

Search

Navigation