Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T22:56:00.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation on the mineral content of pasture grass and its effect on herbivora: III. Report on the chemical analyses of samples of pasture from various areas in the British Isles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Walter Elliot ,
T. B. Wood  and
William Godden
Walter Elliot
Affiliation:
(From the Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen.)
T. B. Wood
Affiliation:
(From the Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen.)
William Godden
Affiliation:
(From the Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

(1) The herbage of the hill pastures in Great Britain is, in general, markedly poorer than that of the cultivated pastures in respect to silica-free ash, and each of the individual ash constituents, with the exception of sodium. It is also poorer, but to a less extent, in nitrogen.

(2) The percentage of silica-free ash in the “not eaten” grass from the hill pastures is only approximately 50 percent of that in the “eaten” grass. This deficiency is fairly uniformly distributed over the ash constituents with the possible exception of sodium.

(3) Despite these marked differences in the mineral content of the different types of pasture, there is very little difference in their caloric value as calculated by the method indicated.

(4) Wherever sheep have a free choice in grazing they appear to eat, by preference, that herbage which contains the higher percentage of mineral ingredients.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1926 , pp. 78 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Elliot, (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Tuff, (1923). J. Compar. Path. Ther. 36, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Davis, Agric. J. of India, 22, 77.Google Scholar
(4)Ingle, (1908). J. Agric. Sci. 3, 22.Google Scholar
(5)Theiler, Green, and du Toit, J. Dep. Agric. S. Africa. 05, 1924.Google Scholar
(6)Aston, (1924). J. Sci. Tech. New Zealand, 7, 216; Trans. New Zealand Institute, 55, 720.Google Scholar
(7)Cruickshank, (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 89.Google Scholar
(8)Godden, (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 98.Google Scholar
(9)Richards, and Godden, (1924). Analyst, 49, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Hall, and Russell, (1912). J. Agric. Sci. 4, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Munro, . Report on the Falkland Islands, 1924.Google Scholar