Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T21:31:20.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clover rot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. A. R. Dillon Weston ,
A. R. Loveless  and
R. Eric Taylor
W. A. R. Dillon Weston
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
A. R. Loveless
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
R. Eric Taylor
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Clover sickness caused by Sclerotinia Trifoliorum is widely distributed in the American continent and western Europe; and in Britain it is often of considerable importance, especially in parts of East Anglia and Yorkshire. The severity of the disease is dependent upon the season, and in some countries very severe financial loss may result.

2. Most of the commonly grown legumes are subject to the disease, but they vary in their susceptibility. Peas affected with the disease have not been observed in the field although they succumb to artificial inoculation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1946 , pp. 18 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alcock, N. L. & Martin, M. S. (1928). Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb. 30, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amos, A. (1918). J. R. Agric. Soc. 79, 68.Google Scholar
Amos, A. (1945). In litt.Google Scholar
Brown, J. G. (1937). Phytopathology. 27, 1045.Google Scholar
Frandsen, K. J. (1942). Nord. JordbrForskn. 24, 12 (cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 23, 23).Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. H. & Myer, D. S. (1915). Circ. Ky Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 8.Google Scholar
Keay, M. A. (1939). Ann. Appl. Biol. 26, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepik, E. (1931). Mitt. Phytopath. Versuchsstat. Univ. Tartu (Esthonia), 7, 14 pp. (cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 11, 24).Google Scholar
Mann, H. H. (1938). J. Agric. Sci. 28, 437.Google Scholar
Moore, W. C. (1943). Bull. Minist. Agric. no. 126. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Nicolaisen, W., Leitzke, B. & Witzig, I. (1940). Phytopath. Z. 12, 585 (cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 23, 22).Google Scholar
Nilsson-Leissner, G. (1934). Bot. Notiser, 5–6, 428 (cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 14, 315).Google Scholar
Nilsson-Leissner, G. (1935). Bot. Notiser, 6, 505 (cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 15, 299).Google Scholar
Nilsson-Leissner, G. (1942). Nord. JordbrForskn. 24, 24 (cited in Rev. Appl. Mycol. 23, 24).Google Scholar
Nilsson-Leissner, G. & Sylvén, N. (1929). Sverig. Utsädesforen. Tidskr. 39, 130.Google Scholar
Pape, H. (1937). Arb. biol. Abt. (Anst.-Reichsanst.), Berl., 22, 159.Google Scholar
Rehm, E. (1872). Die Entwicklungsgeschichte eines die Kleearten zerstörenden Pilzes. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Sampson, K. & Western, J. H. (1941). Diseases of British Grasses and Herbage Legumes, p. 40. Camb. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Valleau, W. D., Fergus, E. N. & Henson, L. (1933). Bull. Ky Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 341.Google Scholar
Wadham, S. M. (1925). New Phytol. 24, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. R. (1937). Ann. Appl. Biol. 24, 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, F. A. & Cromwell, R. O. (1919). Tech. Bull. N. Car. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 16.Google Scholar