Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T12:28:32.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil factors affecting the yield of winter wheat: analysis of results from I.C.I. surveys 1979–80

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. H. Weir ,
J. H. Rayner ,
J. A. Catt ,
D. G. Shipley  and
J. D. Hollies
A. H. Weir
Affiliation:
Soils and Plant Nutrition Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, ALB 2JQ
J. H. Rayner
Affiliation:
Soils and Plant Nutrition Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, ALB 2JQ
J. A. Catt
Affiliation:
Soils and Plant Nutrition Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, ALB 2JQ
D. G. Shipley
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries p.l.c., Billingham, Cleveland
J. D. Hollies
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries p.l.c., Billingham, Cleveland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The soils of fields where winter wheat yields were measured for the I.C.I. Ten Tonne Club Survey in 1979 and 1980 were identified according to the soil series recognized by the Soil Survey of England and Wales. The yield distributions were almost normal, with means 1·49 and 1·60 t/ha greater than the national average. Soil series accounted for 18–19% of the yield variance in both years, which was much more than any other single factor measured. If introduced in best order, soil series, crop variety, previous crop and sowing date accounted for 31% of the variance in both years. However, classes based on soil particle size and drainage, as derived from series identifications, accounted for very little of the variance. Only thick brickearth (loess) soils gave greater mean yields in both years than the overall means of all sites where series were identified. The same soil types provided 35% of the sites where > 10 t/ha was achieved in either year, though a wide range of soil types gave such large yields.

Yields were greater in 1980 than in 1979 in almost all parts of the country. Although rainfall was only slightly less in the spring and early summer of 1980 than in the same period in 1979, many parts of the country suffered large potential soil moisture deficits in 1980, but these decreased yields slightly on a few series only. Factors other than rainfall used to calculate soil moisture deficits (radiation or wind) probably affected yields much more than rainfall itself.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 639 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1983). CSO Monthly Digest of Statistics, August, p. 37.Google Scholar
Avery, B. W. (1980). Soil classification for England and Wales (higher categories). Soil Survey Technical Monograph 14, 67 pp.Google Scholar
Blackbeard, J. (1982). How a world record wheat crop was grown. Arable Farming, February 1982, 45 and 49.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A. (1978). The contribution of loess to soils in lowland Britain. Council for British Archaeology Research Report 21, The Effect of Man on the Landscape: the Lowland Zone (ed. Limbrey, S. and Evans, J. G.), pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., Weir, A. H. & Rayner, J. H. (1981). Effect of soil type on 1979 yields of winter wheat. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1980, p. 247.Google Scholar
Church, B. M. & Austin, R. B. (1983). Variability of wheat yields in England and Wales. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gales, K. (1983). Yield variation of wheat and barley in relation to crop growth and soil conditions – a review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 1085–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. (1976). Soil Survey Field Handbook. Soil Survey Technical Monograph 5, 99 pp.Google Scholar
Hollies, J. D. (1979). Pointers to Profitable Wheat. A Survey of Winter Wheat Growing in 1027 Fields in England in 1979. I.C.I. Fertilizer Sales Department, Billingham, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Hollies, J. D. (1980). Pointers to Profitable Wheat. A Survey of Winter Wheat Growing in 899 Fields in England in 1980. I.C.I. Fertilizer Sales Department, Billingham, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Hotson, J. & Kirby, A. S. (1978). The CAMAP Programmes Manual. Programme Library Unit Report 27, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Jackson, B. G. & Sturrock, F. G. (1966). The national wheat survey. Agriculture 73, 308–312.Google Scholar
Mackney, D. (1968). Special surveys. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1967, pp. 312–313.Google Scholar
Mackney, D. (1969). The agronomic significance of soil mapping units. The Systematics Association Publication 8, The Soil Ecosystem (ed. Sheals, J. G.), pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 281, 277–294.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Of England And Wales (1983). Soil Map of England and Wales Scale 1:250 000. Soil Survey of England and Wales, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Tinker, P. B. (1982). Soil limitations to crop yield. Breaking the Climate/Soil Barriers to Crop Yield (ed. Miller, M. H., Brown, D. M. and Beauchamp, E. G.), pp. 19–54. University of Guelph, Ontario.Google Scholar
Tinker, P. B. & Widdowson, F. V. (1982). Maximising wheat yields and some causes of yield variation. Symposium on Fertilisers and Intensive Wheat Production in the EEC. The Fertiliser Society Proceedings 211, pp. 149–184.Google Scholar