Skip to main content
Log in

Realisierung von Cross-Selling Potenzialen durch das Management von kundeninitiierten Kontakten

Cross-Selling in response to customer-intiated contacts

  • ZfB-SPECIAL ISSUE 2/2011
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Zusammenfassung

Angesichts einer zunehmend erschwerten Zielgruppenerreichbarkeit wird dem Cross-Selling im Kontext von kundeninitiierten Kontakten erhebliches Potenzial beigemessen. Die Forschung hat sich bislang zu wenig mit der Frage beschäftigt, unter welchen Bedingungen zusätzliche Produkte und Dienstleistungen erfolgreich an Bestandskunden verkauft werden können. Insbesondere zu Cross-Selling bei kundeninitiierten Kontakten gibt es kaum Studien.

Daher erfolgt in diesem Beitrag erstmals eine empirische Analyse von Metriken im Spannungsfeld zwischen Marketing und Operations Management, welche zur Steuerung von Cross-Selling Initiativen, z. B. im Call Center, herangezogen werden können. Weiterhin werden verhaltensorientierte Konsequenzen in Folge des Cross-Selling betrachtet.

Die Ergebnisse zu den Metriken lassen Aussagen zur Signifikanz und Wirkung von Größen des Operations Management gegenüber Größen des Marketing zu. Es wird ein Einfluss von Lösung der Kundenanfrage beim Erstkontakt und dem Grund der Kontaktaufnahme auf den Cross-Selling Erfolg festgestellt. Die Analyse der Verhaltenskonsequenzen zeigt, dass sich die Nutzungsintensität von Kunden unmittelbar nach Erwerb einer Cross-Selling Dienstleistung erhöht, diese aber nach wenigen Wochen wieder auf das Ausgangsniveau zurückfällt. Ausgehend von den Ergebnissen lassen sich für die Praxis Handlungsempfehlungen zur Steuerung von Cross-Selling Initiativen und Steigerung sowie Stabilisierung von Cash-Flows ableiten.

Abstract

Existing research has not sufficiently addressed the question of how to cross-sell additional products and services to customers and what the behavioral consequences of cross-selling are. Moreover, these cross-selling-related questions have not been investigated in the context of customer-initiated contacts.

The contribution of the paper is the empirical analysis of metrics which can be used to predict cross-selling success, e.g., in a call-center. The results show that two metrics, namely first contact resolution and reason for contact, significantly predict cross-selling success. Another contribution is the analysis of behavioral consequences. Here the results show that usage intensity significantly increases the time directly after the cross-selling took place but relapses to the original level within a few weeks.

The results of the study can be used to derive managerial implications for managing and controlling cross-selling initiatives and for increasing and stabilizing cash-flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Notes

  1. Der Deutsche Direktmarketing Verband (DDV) verpflichtet sich, dem Wunsch der registrierten Verbraucher nach Werbefreiheit nachzukommen und keinerlei kommerzielle Interaktionen mit diesen aufzunehmen (DDV 2008). Darüber hinaus sei an dieser Stelle darauf hingewiesen, dass nach § 7 des Gesetzes gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (UWG) die Zusendung von unerwünschter Werbung, Telefonanrufe sowie der Versand von Faxen oder elektronischer Post ohne Einwilligung des Adressaten als unzumutbare Belästigung definiert wird.

  2. Der Begriff „kundeninitiierter Kontakt“ (customer-initiated contact) wurde ursprünglich von Bowman und Narayandas (2001) im Business-to-Business-Kontext geprägt.

  3. In der vorliegenden Studie werden Cross-Selling Dienstleistungen betrachtet, d. h. eine Add-on Tarifoption zum bestehenden Basistarif. Unter Up-Selling wird im Mobilfunkbereich vorwiegend die Migration in einen höheren Basistarif verstanden.

  4. Eine Cross-Selling-Offerte verursacht Kosten. Gerade im Call Center Bereich optimiert das Operations Management typischerweise effizienzorientierte Metriken wie die Wartezeit bei optimaler Auslastung der Agenten und gegebenem Service Level. Wird ein Cross-Selling Angebot unterbreitet, dauert folglich das Gespräch länger (Produktinformation, ggf. Vollzug der Transaktion, Konfiguration des neuen Services, etc.) und damit erhöht sich die Wartezeit für andere Kunden. Beispielsweise muss dann zur Aufrechterhaltung eines gewissen Service Levels (wie etwa Wartezeiten <20 Sek. in der Telefonschleife) zusätzlich Personal eingestellt werden.

  5. Die vorliegende Arbeit konzentriert sich auf vertraglich gebundene Kunden, Prepaid-Kunden werden im Rahmen der empirischen Untersuchung nicht miteinbezogen.

  6. Im Rahmen der europäischen Datenschutzrichtlinien ist die Datenspeicherung über maximal 25 Wochen erlaubt.

  7. Das Genetic Matching ist eine Verallgemeinerung des Mahalanobis-Distance-Matchings und des Propensity-Score-Matchings (Sekhon 2007). Diese finden in der Forschung häufig Anwendung, z. B. Morgan und Harding (2006), Gordan und Huber (2007). Der genetische Algorithmus (Sekhon und Mebane 1998) wird zur Optimierung des Gleichgewichts so weit verwendet, wie es die jeweils verfügbaren Daten zulassen. Diese Methode ist nicht parametrisch und hängt daher nicht vom geschätzten Neigungsfaktor (Propensity Score) ab.

  8. Die Gesprächsdauer erschien als unangemessen für das Matching. Die analysierten Kunden sind alle Besitzer eines Vertrags, der für Anrufe von bis zu einer Stunde einen festgesetzten Betrag berechnet. Für Anrufe, die länger als eine Stunde dauern, wird für jede weitere angebrochene Stunde ein zusätzlicher Fixbetrag addiert. 75 % aller Privatkunden des Dienstleisters haben diesen Tarif gebucht.

  9. Der Begriff Wear-Out entstammt ursprünglich der Literatur zur Werbeforschung und beschreibt die Effektivität von Werbemaßnahmen, welche typischerweise in unmittelbarer zeitlicher Folge zur Werbeaktion ansteigt. Langfristig gesehen verfällt der Effekt aber wieder, sofern die Werbekampagne nicht erneut geschalten wird. Der Begriff Wear-Out kam in den sechziger Jahren auf und findet inzwischen auch außerhalb der Werbeforschung Anwendung (vgl. hierzu z. B. Appel 1971; Calder und Sternthal 1980).

Literatur

  • Aaker DS, Bruzzone DE (1985) Causes of irritation in advertising. J Market 49(2):47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksin OZ, Armony M, Mehrotra V (2007) The modern call-center: a multi-disciplinary perspective on operations management research. Production Operations Manag 16(6):665–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson W, Sessions RE (1962) Basic research report on consumer behaviour: Report on a study of shopping behaviour and methods for its investigation. In: Frank RE, Kuehn AA, Massy WF (Hrsg) Quantitative techniques in marketing analysis. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, S 29–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EW, Sullivan MW (1993) The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Market Sci 12(2):125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen TW (2000) Antecedents to satisfaction with service recovery. Eur J Mark 34(1–2):156–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Antil JH (1984) Conceptualization and operationalization of involvement. Advances in Consumer Research 11:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel V (1971) On advertising wearout. J Advert Res 11(1):11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Armony M, Gurvich I (2006) When promotions meet operations: cross-selling and its effect on call-center performance. Working paper. New York University & Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer RA, Greyser SA (1968) Advertising in America: the consumer view. Harvard University, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker LC (1986) Reciprocity. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Belz C (2007) Zumutbares Marketing. In: Jahrbuch Marketing Kommunikation 2008. Abrufbar unter http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/41656. Zugegriffen: 16. Dezember 2010

  • Berger PD, Nasr NI (1998) Customer lifetime value: marketing models and applications. J Interact Mark 12(1):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger PD, Bolton RN, Bowman D, Briggs E, Kumar V, Parasuraman A, Terry C (2002) Marketing actions and the value of customer assets: a framework for customer asset management. J Serv Res 5(1):39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienenstock R, Bonomo P, Hunter R (2004) Keeping mobile customers. McKinsey Q 40(1):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg RC, Kim B, Neslin SA (2008) Database marketing: analyzing and managing customers. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Blodget JG, Hill DJ, Tax SS (1997) The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on post-complaint behavior. J Retailing 73(2):185–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodapati AV (2008) Recommendation systems with purchase data. J Mark Res 45(1):77–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton RN (1998) A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: the role of satisfaction. Market Sci 17(1):45–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton RN, Lemon KN (1999) A dynamic model of customers’ usage of services: usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. J Mark Res 36(2):171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton RN, Lemon KN, Verhoef PC (2008) Expanding business-to-business customer relationships: modeling the customer’s upgrade decision. J Market 70(1):46–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman D, Narayandas D (2001) Managing customer-initiated contacts with manufacturers: the impact on share of category requirements and word-of-mouth behavior. J Mark Res 38(3):281–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Braff A, Passmore WJ, Simpson M (2003) Going the distance with telecom customers. McKinsey Q 39(4):82–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck R (2004) The gratitude of exchange and the gratitude of caring: a developmental-interactionist perspective of moral emotion. In: Emmons RA, McCullough M (Hrsg) The psychology of gratitude. Oxford University Press, New York, S 100–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin LP (1966) Testing propensities to shop. J Market 30(1):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder BJ, Sternthal B (1980) Television commercial wearout: an information processing view. J Mark Res 17(2):173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings WH, Venkatesan M (1976) Cognitive dissonance and consumer behavior: a review of the evidence. J Mark Res 13(3):303–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlhoff H-D (1979) Ungeplante und impulsive Kaufentscheidungen. Working paper Nr. 19, Institut für Marketing an der Universität Münster, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl WD, Honea H, Manchanda RV (2005) Three Rs of interpersonal consumer guilt: relationship, reciprocity, reparation. J Consum Psychol 15(4):307–315

    Google Scholar 

  • DDV (2008) Deutscher Direktmarketing Verband e. V. Available at http://www.direktmarketing-info.de/?cid=39. Zugegriffen: 11. May 2010

  • Dean AM (2007) The impact of the customer orientation of call center employees on customers’ affective commitment and loyalty. J Serv Res 10(2):161–173

    Google Scholar 

  • del Río-Lanza AB, Vázquez-Casielles R, Díaz-Martín AM (2009) Satisfaction with service recovery: perceived justice and emotional responses. J Bus Res 62(8):775–781

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2002) Overestimating self-control: evidence from the health club industry. Research paper Nr. 1880, Stanford University, California

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2004) Contract design and self-control: theory and evidence. Quart J Econ 119(2):353–402

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2006) Paying not to go to the gym. Amer Econ Rev 96(June):694–719

    Google Scholar 

  • de Véricourt F, Zhou Y-P (2005) Managing response time in a call-routing problem with service failure. Oper Res 53(6):968–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar R, Glazer R (2003) Hedging customers. Harvard Bus Rev 81(5):86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • DMA (2009) 2009 Response Rate Report. Direct Marketing Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn HJ, Huganh RM (1986) Decision making under ambiguity. J Bus 59(4, Part 2):225–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel JF, Kollat DT, Roger D (1973) Consumer behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg RA, Kim IS, Hokama L, de Ruyter K, Keen C (2000) Operational determinants of caller satisfaction in the call center. Int J Serv Ind Manag 11(2):131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg RA, Hokama L, Kadam R, Kim I (2002) Operational determinants of caller satisfaction in the banking/financial services call center. Int J Bank Mark 20(4):174–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Perterson & Company, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans N, Koole G, Mandelbaum A (2003) Telephone call centers: tutorial, review, and research prospects. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 5:79–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner Inc. (2008) A checklist for evaluating an Inbound and outbound multichannel campaign management application. ID Number: G00160776

  • Gartner Inc. (2009) The future of the contact center: service is key to customer strategy. ID Number: G00166106

  • Gensler S, Böhm M, Skiera B (2007) Einfluss der Nutzung des Online-Bankings auf das Produktnutzungsverhalten und die Profitabilität von Bankkunden. Z Betriebswirtsch 77(6):675–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson KA, Khandelwal DK (2005) Getting more from call centers. McKinsey Q. Abrufbar unter: http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Operations/Outsourcing/Getting_more_from_call_centers_1597. Zugegriffen: 30. Jan. 2009

  • Godin S (1999) Permission marketing: turning strangers into friends and friends into customers. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman PS, Fichman M, Lerch FJ, Snyder PR (1995) Customer-firm relationships, involvement, and customer satisfaction. Acad Manage J 38(5):1310–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordan S, Huber G (2007) The effect of electoral competitiveness on incumbent behavior. Quart J Polit Sci 2(2):107–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Lehmann DR, Stuart JA (2004) Valuing customers. J Mark Res 41(7):7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Lehmann DR (2005) Managing customers as investments: the strategic value of customers in the long run. Wharton School Pub, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurvich I, Armony M, Maglaras C (2009) Cross–selling in a call center with a heterogeneous customer population. Oper Res 57(2):299–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (1997) Instrumental variables: a study of implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. J Hum Resour 32(3):441–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland PW (1986) Statistics and causal inference. J Amer Statistical Assoc 81(396):945–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard JA, Sheth JN (1969) The theory of buyer behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar R, Ansari A, Gupta S (2007) A model of consumer learning for service quality and usage. J Mark Res 44(4):529–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer ES (1989) Unplanned purchasing: knowledge of shopping environment and time pressure. J Retailing 65:40–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain DC, Singh SS (2002) Customer lifetime value research in marketing: a review and future directions. J Interact Mark 16(2):34–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones TW, Sasser EW (1995) Why satisfied customers defect? Harvard Bus Rev 73(6):88–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Snell J (1992) Predicting a changing taste: do people know what they will like? J Behav Decis Mak 5:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura WA, Wedel M, de Rosa F, Mazzon JA (2003) Cross-selling through database marketing: a mixed data factor analyzer for data augmentation and prediction. Int J Res Mark 20:45–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer J-N, Laurent G (1985) Consumers’ involvement profile: new empirical results. Adv Consum Res 12:290–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona G, Mueller E (1954) A study of purchase decisions. In: Clark LH (Hrsg) Consumer behaviour: the dynamics of consumer reaction. New York University Press, New York, S 30-87

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiningham TL, Aksoy L, Andreassen TW, Cooil B, Wahren BJ (2006) Call center satisfaction and customer retention in a co-branded service context. Manag Ser Q 16(3):269–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott A, Hayes A, Neslin SA (2002) Next-product-to-buy models for cross-selling applications. J Interact Mark 16(3):59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Koole G, Mandelbaum A (2002) Queueing models of call centers: an introduction. Ann Oper Res 113(1):41–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kridel DJ, Lehman DE, Weisman DL (1993) Option value, telecommunications demand, and policy. Inf Econ Policy 5(2):125–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwortnik RJ Jr, Thompson GM (2009) Unifying service marketing and operations with service experience management. J Serv Res 11(4):389–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht A, Skiera B (2006) Paying too much and being happy about it: existence, causes, and consequences of tariff-choice biases. J Mark Res 43(2):212–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Larivière B, van den Poel D (2005) Predicting customer retention and profitability by using random forests and regression forests techniques. Expert Systems Appl 29(2):472–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon KN, White TB, Winer RS (2002) Dynamic customer relationship management: Incorporating future considerations into the service retention decision. J Market 66(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Little JDC (1979) Decision support systems for marketing managers. J Market 43(3):9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce MF (1992) Buying more than we can use: factors influencing forecasts of consumer quality. In: Sherry JF Jr, Sternthal B (Hrsg) Advances in consumer research, Bd 19. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, S 584–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra MK, Sharma S (2002) Spanning the continuum between marketing and operations. J Oper Manage 20(3):209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Menasco MB, Hawkins DI (1978) A field test of the relationship between cognitive dissonance and state anxiety. J Mark Res 15(Nov):650–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Metters R, Marucheck A (2007) Service management – Academic issues and scholarly reflections from operations management researchers. Decisi Sci 38(2):195–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Miciak A, Desmarais M (2001) Benchmarking service quality performance at business-to-business and business-to-consumer call centers. J Bus Ind Mark 16(5):340–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell BM, Vogelsang I (1991) Telecommunications pricing: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal V, Kumar V, Tsiros M (1999) Attribute-level performance, satisfaction and behavioral intentions over time: a consumption system approach. J Market 63(2):88–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan SL, Harding DJ (2006) Matching estimators of causal effects: prospects and pitfalls in theory and practice. Social Methods Res 35(1):3–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes JC (2000) A cognitive model of people’s usage estimations. J Mark Res 37(4):397–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Örmeci EL, Aksin OZ (2005) Revenue management through dynamic cross-selling in call centers. Working paper, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Olsen LL, Johnson MD (2003) Service equity, satisfaction, and Loyalty: from transaction-specific to cumulative evaluations. J Serv Res 5:184–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1997) Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the customer. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels K, Ambler T, Clark BH, LaPointe P, Reibstein D, Skiera B, Wierenga B, Wiesel T (2009) Dashboards as a service: why, what, how, and what research is needed? J Serv Res 12(2):175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier RW, Jarvis CB, Bechkoff JR, Kardes FR (2009) The role of customer gratitude in relationship marketing. J Market 73(5):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramani G, Kumar V (2008) Interaction orientation and firm performance. J Market 72(1):27–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratchford B (1982) Cost-benefit models for explaining consumer choice and information seeking behavior. Manage Sci 28(2):197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz W, Thomas JS, Kumar V (2005) Balancing acquisition and retention resources to maximize customer profitability. J Market 69(1):63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins ML, Bloch PH (1986) After the new wears off: the temporal context of product involvement. J Cons Res 13(2):280–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Rook DW (1987) The buying impulse. J Cons Res 14(2):189–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1973) Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics 29(1):159–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66:688–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1977) Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. J Educ Stat 2(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1978) Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Ann Stat 6(1):34–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1990) Comment: Neyman (1923) and causal inference in experiments and observational studies. Stat Sci 5(4):472–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust RT, Varki S (1996) Rising from the ashes of advertising. J Bus Res 37(3):173–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiders K, Voss GB, Grewal D, Godfrey AL (2005) Do satisfied customers buy more? Examining moderating influences in a retailing context. J Market 69(4):26–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon JS, Mebane WRJ (1998) Genetic optimization using derivatives: theory and application to nonlinear models. Polit Anal 7:189–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon JS (2007) Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. J Stat Softw VV(II)

  • Shankar V, Malthouse EC (2006) Moving interactive marketing forward. J Interact Mark 20(1):2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar V, Malthouse EC (2007) The growth of interactions and dialogs in interactive marketing. J Interact Mark 21(2):2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin J, Ariely D (2004) Keeping doors open: the effect of unavailability on incentives to keep options viable. Manage Sci 50(5):575–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh J (1988) Consumer complaint intentions and behavior: definitional and taxonomical issues. J Market 52(1):93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Splawa-Neyman J (1923) On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: Essay on principles: Section 9. Stat Sci 5(4):465–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava RK, Shervani TA, Fahey L (1998) Market-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for analysis. J Market 62(1):2–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava RK, Shervani TA, Fahey L (1999) Marketing, business processes, and shareholder value: An organizationally embedded view of marketing activities and the discipline of marketing. J Market 63(Special Issue):168–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauss B (1999) Kundenzufriedenheit. Market ZFP 21(1):5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax SS, Brown SW, Chandrashekaran M (1998) Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. J Market 62(2):60–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor LD (1994) Telecommunications demand in theory and practice, 2. Aufl. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezinde T, Smith B, Murphy J (2002) Getting permission: exploring factors affecting permission marketing. J Interact Mark 16(4):28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef PC, Franses PH, Hoekstra JC (2001) The impact of satisfaction and payment equity on cross-buying: a dynamic model for a multi-service provider. J Retailing 77(3):359–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef PC, Franses PH, Hoekstra JC (2002) The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: does age of relationship matter? J Acad Mark Sci 30(3):202–216

    Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn J, Verhoef PC (2008) Critical incidents and the impact of satisfaction on customer share. J Market 72(4):123–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel V, Evanschitzky H, Ramaseshan B (2008) Customer equity drivers and future sales. J Market 72(6):98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • v. Wangenheim F, Bayón T (2007) Behavioral consequences of overbooking service capacity. J Market 71(4):36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg P (1981) Das Entscheidungsverhalten der Konsumenten. Schöningh, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg P (1983) Beobachtung des emotionalen Verhaltens. In: Innovative Marktforschung (Hrsg) von der Forschungsgruppe Konsum und Verhalten, Würzburg, S 45–62

  • Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Market 60(2):31–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA (2000) Service quality, profitability, and the economic worth of customers: What we know and what we need to learn. J Acad Mark Sci 28(1):67–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Heumann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heumann, C., Freudenschuss, M., v. Wangenheim, F. et al. Realisierung von Cross-Selling Potenzialen durch das Management von kundeninitiierten Kontakten. Z Betriebswirtsch 81 (Suppl 2), 31–55 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-010-0433-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-010-0433-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation