Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

EU risk assessment guidelines

Part I. Quality criteria for environmental risk assessment software using the example of EUSES Stefan Schwartz, Volker Berding, Stefan Trapp, Michael Matthies ESPR 5 (4) 217–222 (1998) Part II. Visualisation of the complexity of EUSES Volker Berding, Stefan Schwartz, Michael Matthies ESPR 6 (1) 37–43 (1999) Part III. Scenario analysis of a Level III multimedia model using generic and regional data Volker Berding, Stefan Schwartz, Michael Matthies ESPR 7 (3) 147–158 (2000)

  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regional PECs (Potential Environmental Concentrations) calculated with the software EUSES were compared with measured values using different emission and environmental distribution scenarios. The environmental data set recommended in EUSES (default data set) represents a generic standard region. In different scenarios the parameters of the generic region are replaced by concrete values, and estimated parameters (emissions, degradation rates and partition coefficients) are substituted by measured or investigated values. Deviations with regard to the measured values can be up to three orders of magnitude. Despite the basically conservative approximations, underestimations can occur. However, these are usually due to poor monitoring data or inappropriate input values. The use of regional data instead of default parameters only slightly ameliorates the results. The use of real emission and degradation rates alone can improve the results significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EU (1996): EUSES — the European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances. Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), The Netherlands. Available from European Chemicals Bureau, Ispra

  2. Beck, M.B.;Ravetz, J.R.;Mulkey, L.A.;Barnwell, T.O. (1997): On the Problem of Model Validation for Predictive Exposure Assessments. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 11: 229–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagner, J.-O.;Matthies, M. (1996): Guidelines for Selection and Application of Fate and Exposure Models. ESPR Environ. Sci. & Pollut.Res.3 (1), 47–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz, S.;Berding, V.;Trapp, S.;Matthies, M. (1998): Quality Criteria for Environmental Risk Assessment Software — Using the Example of EUSES. Environmental Science and Pollution Research5 (4): 217–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berding, V.;Schwartz, S.;Matthies, M. (1999): Visualisation of the Complexity of EUSES. Environmental Science and Pollution Research6 (1): 37–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz, S. (1997): Organische Schadstoffe in der Nahrungskette — Vorstudie zur Validierung von Umweltexpositionsmodellen. In: Beiträge des Instituts für Umweltsystemforschung der Universität Osnabrück (Hrsg. M. Matthies), Beitrag Nr. 5, Osnabrück

  7. Falconer, R.L.;Bidleman, T.F. (1994): Vapour Pressures and Predicted Particle/Gas Distributions of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners as Functions of Temperature and Ortho-Chlorine Substitution. Atmospheric Environment28: 547–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. NRW (1995): TEMES Jahresberichte 1992, 1993, 1994 – Tabellenband 1992. Landesumweltamt Nordrhein-Westfalen, Essen.

  9. Statistisches Bundesamt (1998): Statistik der öffentlichen Wasserversorgung und öffentlichen Abwasserbeseitigung 1995. Metzler Poeschel, Stuttgart

  10. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (1998): Gemeinsames WWW-Angebot der statistischen Ämter der Länder und des Bundes — Öffentliche Wasserversorgung und Abwasserbeseitigung. URL: http://www.brandenburg.de/statreg/

  11. NRW (1998): Landesamt für Datenverarbeitung und Statistik Nordrhein-Westfalen. Katasterfläche nach Nutzungsarten der Vermessungsverwaltung (Ergebnisse der Flächenerhebung). URL: http://www.lds.nrw.de/gemdat/gem_data/ d01b.htm

  12. NRW (1996): LUA-Materialien Nr. 30. Ergebnisse von DioxinEmissionsmessungen an Industrieanlagen in NRW. Dioxinmeß-programm Nordrhein-Westfalen. Abschlußbericht 1996

  13. Ballschmiter, K.; Bacher, R. (1996): Dioxine: Chemie, Analytik, Vorkommen und Toxikologie der halogenierten Dibenzo-p-Dioxine und Dibenzofurane. VH, Weinheim

  14. Horstmann, M.;McLachlan, M.S. (1994): Textiles as a Source of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) in Human Skin and Sewage Sludge. In: Environmental Science & Pollution Research1 (1) 1994: 15–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, K.C.; Steward, A.P. (1997): Dioxins and Furans in Sewage Sludges: A Review of their Occurrence and Sources in Sludge and of their Environmental Fate, Behaviour, and Significance in Sludge-Amended Agricultural Systems. In: Terry J. Logan (ed.): Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 27(1): 1–85

  16. Mackay, D.;Shiu, W.Y.;Ma, K.C. (1991–1997): Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate of Organic Chemicals — Volumes I to V. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea

    Google Scholar 

  17. EU (1996): Technical Guidance Document in Support of the Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances and the Commission Regulation (EC) 1488/94 on Risk Assessment of Existing Substances, Parts I-IV. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schwartz, S.;Berding, V.;Matthies, M. (2000): Aquatic Fate Assessment of the Polycyclic Fragrance HHCB — Scenario and Variability Analysis in Accordance with the EU Risk Assessment Guidelines. Chemosphere41: 107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bennett, D.H.;McKone, T.E.;Matthies, M.;Kastenberg, W.E. (1998): General Formulation of Characteristic Travel Distance for Semi-volatile Organic Chemicals in a Multi-me-dia Environment, Environ. Sci. Technol.32: 4023–4030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. NRW (1991): Meßprogramm “Chloraromaten — Herkunft und Transfer” 1990, Abschlußbericht. Ministerium für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf.

  21. UBA (1995): Polychlorierte PCDD/F und Analoge in datierten aquatischen Sedimenten und terrestrischen Böden. Umweltbundesamt Texte 42/95

  22. Howard, P.H. (1990): Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data. Lewis Publ., Chelsea.

    Google Scholar 

  23. BUA (1988): Stoffbericht 24: Benzol. Beratergremium für umweltrelevante Altstoffe (Ed.), VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rippen, G. (1995): Handbuch Umweltchemikalien (1992–1995). ecomed, Landsberg.

  25. Landesamt für Wasser und Abfall Nordrhein-Westfalen LWA (1993): LWA-Materialien Nr. 6/93, Phthalate in der aquatischen Umwelt — Analytik, Verbreitung, Verbleib und Bewertung, Düsseldorf

  26. Dechema (1995): DECHEMA Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chemisches Apparatewesen, Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e.V. (Ed.): Kriterien zur Beurteilung organischer Bodenkontaminationen: Dioxine (PCDD/F) und Phthalate. Frankfurt

  27. BUA (1995): Stoffbericht 163: 1,2-Dichlorethan. Beratergremium für umweltrelevante Altstoffe (Ed.),S. Hirzel, Wissenschaftl. Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  28. BUA (1996): Stoffbericht 168: Ethylendiamintetraessigsäure. Beratergremium für umweltrelevante Altstoffe (Ed.),S. Hirzel, Wissenschaftl. Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  29. EU (1997): ECDIN — Environmental Chemicals Data and Information Network. URL: http://ulisse.etoit.eudra.org/Ecdin/ Ecdin.html

  30. Eschke, H. D.;Traud, J.;Dibowski, H.J. (1994): Untersuchungen zum Vorkommen polycyclischer Moschus-Duftstoffe in verschiedenen Umweltkompartimenten — Nachweis und Analytik mit GC/MS in Oberflächen-, Abwässern und Fischen (1. Mitteilung). 2. Umweltchem. Ökotox.6: 183–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Eschke, H.D.;Traud, J.;Dibowski, H.J. (1995): Untersuchungen zum Vorkommen polycyclischer Moschus-Duftstoffe in verschiedenen Umweltkompartimenten — Nachweis und Analytik mit GC/MS in Oberflächen-, Abwässern und Fischen sowie in Waschmitteln und Kosmetika (2. Mitteilung). Z. Umweltchem. Ökotox.7: 131–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. BKH (1993): Environmental fate and behaviour of LAS, Literature review. BKH consulting engineers, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  33. WHO (1996): World Health Organization Geneva. Environmental Health Criteria 169. Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonates and related compounds. International Programme on Chemical Safety

  34. Figge, K.;Schöberl, P. (1989): LAS and the Application of Sewage Sludge in Agriculture. Tenside Surfactants Detergents26: 122–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schöberl, P.;Spilker, R. (1996): Alkylbenzolsulfonat (LAS)-Konzentrationen im Lippe-Sediment eines Rhein-Altarmes. Tenside Surfactants Detergents33: 400–403

    Google Scholar 

  36. UBA (1996): Personengebundene Exposition gegenüber flüchtigen organischen Verbindungen in den alten Bundesländern. WaBoLu Heft 4/96. Institut für Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene des Umweltbundesamtes

  37. UBA (1996): UBA-Texte 38/96. Bewertung der Umwelt-gefährlichkeit ausgewählter Altstoffe durch das Umweltbundesamt. Teil II. Altstoffliste

  38. Plassche, E.J. van de; Balk, F. (1997): Environmental Risk Assessment of the Polycyclic Musks AHTN and HHCB according to the EU-TGD. RIVM Report 601503008, Bilthoven

  39. EU (1996): IUCLID — International Uniform Chemical Information Database, Existing chemicals, Edition I. European Chemicals Bureau (EC/DGXI), Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shiu W.Y.;Doucette, W.;Gobas, F.;Andren, A.;Mackay, D. (1988): Physical-Chemical Properties of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins. Environ. Sci. Technol.22: 651–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. BUA (1986): Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. BUA Report 4 (January 1986). VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  42. SRC-AOP. Atmospheric Oxidation Program for Microsoft Windows AOPWIN v1.88. Copyright William Meylan, 1994–1998

  43. European Amini-Carboxylates Producers Committee (1990): Chelating Agents — Questions and Answers EDTA, Brüssel

  44. Grob, M. (1996): Analytische Bestimmung der Konzentrationen von Waschmittelinhaltsstoffen in einem kleinen, durch Kläranlagen belasteten Vorfluter. Diplomarbeit. Heinrich-Heine Universität Düsseldorf. Institut für Physikalische Chemie und Elektrochemie

  45. Jensen, J. (1999): Fate and effects of linear alkylbenzene sulphonates (LAS) in the terrestrial environment. The Science of the Total Environment226: 93–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Woltering, D.M.;Larson, R.J.;Hopping, W.D.;Jamieson, R.A. (1988): Verbleib und Wirkungen von Waschmittelchemikalien in der Umwelt. Tenside Surfactants Detergents25: 115–127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrück, D-49069, Osnabrück, Germany

    Volker Berding, Stefan Schwartz & Michael Matthies

Authors
  1. Volker Berding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Schwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Matthies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Berding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berding, V., Schwartz, S. & Matthies, M. EU risk assessment guidelines. Environ. Sci. & Pollut. Res. 7, 147–158 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987738

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987738

Keywords

Search

Navigation