Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic and environmental correlations of leaf and fruit shapes ofCucumis melo

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In cantaloupe(Cucumis melo L. var.reticulatus Naud., cultivar PMR 45) leaf shape,fruit shape, and flesh proportion were associated as they varied from growing site to growing site. The same associations held as the characteristics varied between PMR 45 and a selection thereof. The conditions indicate that the three characteristics respond to both genetic and environmental stimuli via a common intermediate mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Bailey, L. H. 1935. The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture. The MacMillan Co., New York, Vol. 1, p. 908.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, G. N. and Meinert, U. G. H. 1965. The effect of plant spacing and fruit pruning on the fruits of P.M.R. No. 45 cantaloupe. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.87: 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —, Whitaker, T. W., Bohn, G. W., and Kasmire, R. F. 1965. Muskmelon production in California. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Extension Circ 536, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, R. M., Jr., Baker, G. A., and Kasmire, R. F. 1964. Muskmelon quality characteristics—their variability and interrelationships. Hilgardia35: 479–489.

    Google Scholar 

  5. —, Jr., Davis, G. N., Meinert, U. G. H., Kimble, K. A., Brown, L. C, May, D. M., May, G. E., Hendricks, L. C., Scheuer-man, R. W., Schweers, V. H., and Wright, D. N. 1967. Developmental aspects of field-to-field variations in selected characteristics of cantaloupe (C.melo L. var.reticulatus Naud.). Hilgardia38: 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esau, Katherine. 1953. Plant Anatomy. Chapters 18 and 19. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 735 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hutchins, A. E. 1934. Morphological relationships in the ontogeny of the cultivated cucumber,Cucumis sativus L. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech Bull. 96.

  8. McGlasson, W. B., and Pratt, H. K. 1963. Fruit-set patterns and fruit growth in cantaloupe(Cueumis melo L., var.reticulatus Naud.) Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.83: 495–505.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sinnott, E. W. 1931. The independence of genetic factors governing size and shape. Jour. Heredity22: 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wardlaw, C. W. 1952. Phylogeny and Morphogenesis. MacMillan and Co., Limited. London. 536 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weetman, L. M. 1935. Correlation of shape of fruits, cotyledons, and seeds in melons. Bot. Gazette97: 388–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitaker, T. W., and Davis, G. N. 1961. Cucurbits. Leonard Hill (Books) Ltd., London, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Cantaloupe in the United States of America isC. melo L. var.reticulatus Naud., a netted muskmelon having a definite abscission zone at the base of the fruit. It is not var.cantaloupensis Naud. as it is in Europe. Compare Bailey (1935), Daviset al. (1965), Whitaker and Davis (1961).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, R.M., Davis, G.N. & Meinert, U.G.H. Genetic and environmental correlations of leaf and fruit shapes ofCucumis melo . Econ Bot 21, 345–350 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02863159

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02863159

Keywords

Navigation