Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the energy potential of agricultural residues and an approach to meet the rural energy demand: the Bangladesh perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bangladesh produces an abundant amount of agricultural residues (crops and livestock) in the rural areas every year. An innovative and sustainable method is presented in this study for assessing their countrywide sustainable energy potentiality and to utilize these residues to meet the energy demand of households of rural Bangladesh. In this study, available data in published literature regarding residue characteristic factors along with their processing techniques were collected and used. The proposed method has been applied to estimate the energy potentials of agricultural residues in Bangladesh in the cropping season 2015–2016. The results show that the available agricultural residues in the rural areas of Bangladesh have the potentiality of producing 9693 million m3/year of biogas and were calculated to be 223 PJ/year equivalents to 7075 MW, close to the (88%) national energy demand. The proposed method could be the best option for meeting the rural energy demand, and a case study was depicted to validate the approach and a proof for sustainable technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BPDB (2017) Annual Report (2016-17), Bangladesh Power Development Board, Ministry of power, energy and mineral Resources (MPEMR) Bangladesh

  2. Hasan MM, Khan MF (2012) A comparative study on installation of solar PV system for grid and non grid rural areas of Bangladesh. 2nd International conference on developments in renewable energy technology (ICDRET), p 5

  3. Chowdhury NR, Reza SE, Nitol TA, Mahabub AAF (2012) Present scenario of renewable energy in Bangladesh and a proposed hybrid system to minimize power crisis in remote areas. Int J Renew Energy Res 2(2):280

    Google Scholar 

  4. Power Division, Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (2008) Renewable energy policy of Bangladesh. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kabir H, Khan M (2010) Using the metafrontier approach for estimating technical efficiency and technological gaps of biogas plants under different regions in Bangladesh. BRP 4(1):31–40 http://www.bdresearchpublication.com/admin/journal/upload/09142/09142.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharya SC, Arul Joe M, Kandhekar Z, Salam PA, Shrestha RM (1999) Greenhouse-gas emission mitigation from the use of agricultural residues: the case of rice husk. Energy 24(1):43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(98)00066-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Demirbas A (2001) Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag 42:1357–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00137-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai JM, Liu RH, Deng CJ (2008) An assessment of biomass resources avail ability in Shanghai: 2005 analysis. Renew Sust Energy Rev 12:1997–2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hossain AK, Badr O (2007) Prospects of renewable energy utilization for electricity generation in Bangladesh. Renew Sust Energy Rev 11:1617–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao PV, . Baral SS, Dey R, Mutnuri S (2010) Biogas generation potential by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in India. Renew Sust Energy Rev 14(7): 2086–2094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Foysal MA, Hossain ML, Rubaiyat A, Sultana S, Maruf K, Sayem MM, Akhter J (2012) Household energy consumption pattern in rural areas of Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Energy 1(5):72–85

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ravindranath NH, Somashekar HI, Nagaraja MS, Sudha P, Sangeetha G, Bhattacharya SC (2005) Assessment of sustainable non-plantation biomass resources potential for energy in India. Biomass Bioenergy 29(3):178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gadde B, Menke C, Wassmann R (2009) Rice straw as a renewable energy source in India, Thailand, and the Philippines: overall potential and limitations for energy contribution and greenhouse gas mitigation. Biomass Bioenergy 33(11):1532–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL (2008) Optimization of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol 99:7928–7940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gauri PM, Sandip SM, Kalyanraman V (2013) Biogas as a sustainable alternative for current energy need of India. JSEE 4:121–132

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kelleher BP, Leahy JJ, Henihan AM, O'Dwyer TF, Sutton D, . Leahy MJ (2002) Advances in poultry litter disposal technology—a review. Bioresour Technol 83:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00133-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Horan NJ, Fletcher L, Betmal SM, Wilks SA, Keevil CW (2004) Die-off of enteric bacterial pathogens during mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Water Res 38:1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li R, Chen S, Li X (2010) Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with dairy manure in a two-phase digestion system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160(2):643–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh J, Gu S (2010) Biomass conversion to energy in India—a critique. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:1367–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Mashad HM, Zhang R (2010) Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresour Technol 101(11):4021–4028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu D (2010) Co-digestion of different wastes for enhanced methane production. The Ohio State University

  22. Shah FA, Mahmood Q, Rashid N, Pervez A, Raja IA, Shah MM (2015) Co-digestion, pretreatment and digester design for enhanced methanogenesis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:627–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bauer F, Persson T, Hulteberg C, Tamm D (2013) Biogas upgrading—technology overview, comparison and perspectives for the future. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 7:499–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Niesner J, Jecha D, Stehlík P (2013) Biogas upgrading technologies: state of art review in European region. Chem Eng Trans 35:517–522. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1335086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alam MM (2015) Present status of biogas technology in Bangladesh: a survey report on poultry and dairy farms, Submitted to International Finance Corporation (IFC), Bangladesh. The work performed by Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh under a project “Green energy knowledge hub”, Funded by International Finance Corporation (IFC), and DANIDA Bangladesh

  26. Rodriguez Caceres K, Blanco Patino F, Araque Duarte J, Kafarov V (2016) Assessment of the energy potential of agricultural residues in non-interconnected zones of Colombia: case study of Chocó and Putumayo. Chem Eng Trans 50:349–354. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1650059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Perera KKCK, Rathnasiri PG, Senarath SAS, Sugathapala AGT, Bhattacharya SC, Salam A (2005) Assessment of sustainable energy potential of non-plantation biomass resources in Sri Lanka. Biomass Bioenergy 29:199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kemausuor F, Kamp A, Thomsen ST, Bensah EC, Østergård H (2014) Assessment of biomass residue availability and bioenergy yields in Ghana. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhattacharya SC, Salam PA, Runqing H, Somashekar HI, Racelis DA, Rathnasiri PG (2005) An assessment of the potential for non-plantation biomass resources in selected Asian countries for 2010. Biomass Bioenergy 29:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. AIS- Agricultural Information System (2016) Ministry of Agriculture, the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka

  31. Prasertsan S, Sajjakulnukit B (2006) Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: potential, opportunity and barriers. Renew Energy 31:599–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hunt D (1968) Farm power and machinery management, fifth edn. Iowa state university press, AMES, Iowa, p 43

  33. Gómez A, Rodrigues M, Montañés C, Dopazo C, Fueyo N (2010) The potential for electricity generation from crop and forestry residues in Spain. Biomass Bioenergy 34:703–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nallathambi GV (1997) Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 13(1):83–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00020-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marie SM, Ioannis A, Fotidis AK, Irini A (2015) Anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural byproducts with manure for enhanced biogas production. Energy Fuel 29:8088–8094. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tong Z, Linlin L, Zilin S, Guangxin R, Yongzhong F, Xinhui H, Gaihe Y (2013) Biogas production by co-digestion of goat manure with three crop residues. PLoS One 8(6):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alam MM, Saha CK, Rahman MA, Moller HB, Islam MR, Jahiruddin M (2016) Present status and future needs of biogas technology in Bangladesh, Paper presented in International Conference CIGR–2016: 26–30 June Aarhus University, Denmark

  38. Rehling UWE (2006) Small biogas plants, SESAM. University of Flensburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the International Finance Corporation (IFC), Bangladesh, for providing the scholarship under the “Green Energy Knowledge Hub Project” Project No.-600237, to allow this research to be undertaken.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, Blichers Alle 20, DK 8830, Tjele, Denmark

    Md. Anisur Rahman & Henrik B. Møller

  2. Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute, Ishurdi-6620, Pabna, Bangladesh

    Md. Anisur Rahman

  3. Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh

    Md. Anisur Rahman & Md. Monjurul Alam

Authors
  1. Md. Anisur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henrik B. Møller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md. Monjurul Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Anisur Rahman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahman, M.A., Møller, H.B. & Alam, M.M. Assessing the energy potential of agricultural residues and an approach to meet the rural energy demand: the Bangladesh perspective. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 8, 925–934 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0343-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0343-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation