Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Correction: High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions

  • Tianjiao Chu,
  • Suveyda Yeniterzi,
  • Svetlana A. Yatsenko,
  • Mary Dunkel,
  • Patricia A. Shaw,
  • Kimberly D. Bunce,
  • David G. Peters
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

Fig 1 is an incorrect duplication of Fig 2. The authors have provided a corrected version here.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Affected Fetal Sample (First Pregnancy).

Array CGH profile showing an interstitial deletion in the short arm of chromosome 5. Top: Ideogram of chromosome 5. The deleted 5p15.33 region is indicated by a red rectangle. Below: A magnified view of the 5p subtelomeric region. Positions are displayed according to GRCh37/hg19 Genome Browser. Shaded blue area indicates a loss in DNA copy number detected by 22 oligonucleotide probes (blue dots), located in the interval chr5:174,979–493,441 and encompassing an approximately 318 kb segment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163578.g001

Reference

  1. 1. Chu T, Yeniterzi S, Yatsenko SA, Dunkel M, Shaw PA, Bunce KD, et al. (2016) High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0153182. pmid:27249650