Erratum: Evolution of precipitate morphology during heat treatment and its implications for the superconductivity in single crystals [Phys. Rev. B 86, 144507 (2012)]
Y. Liu, Q. Xing, K. W. Dennis, R. W. McCallum, and T. A. Lograsso
Phys. Rev. B 92, 059901 – Published 14 August 2015
SEM images reveal the coexistence of two phases in single crystals. (a) The crystals obtained by as-quenching (AQ) at 1073 K showing bright network. (b) Back-reflection Laue x-ray pattern of the same crystal, where yellow arrows indicate the orientation of a and b axes of 122 structure. (c) Schematic drawing of phase separation. The square in red dashed lines marks the unit cell of 122 structure, while that in black dashed lines corresponds to the unit cell of superstructure. Network is supposed to be 122 structure, where iron vacancy sites (Fe2 sites) are filled with red spots. The iron vacancy sites in the superstructure, that is iron vacancy ordering status (OS), are represented by the cross (Fe2 sites). Fe1 sites (blue spots) are fully occupied. The length of the long side of rectangular bar ranges from several hundred nanometers in as-quenched and postannealed samples to in furnace-cooled samples. In order to display the crystal structures of the superconducting phase and iron vacancy ordered phase, rectangular bars were drawn at a scale of . Lattice distortions in the interface between two phases are omitted. (d) Iron vacancy disordering status (DOS).