English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Monitoring and volumetric estimation of injected CO2 using 4D seismic, petrophysical data, core measurements and well logging: a case study at Ketzin, Germany

Authors
/persons/resource/aivanova

Ivanova,  Alexandra
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Kashubin,  A.
External Organizations;

Juhojuntti,  N.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/jule

Kummerow,  Juliane
4.1 Reservoir Technologies, 4.0 Chemistry and Material Cycles, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/janhen

Henninges,  Jan
4.1 Reservoir Technologies, 4.0 Chemistry and Material Cycles, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Juhlin,  C.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/slueth

Lüth,  Stefan
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Ivandic,  M.
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

18394.pdf
(Any fulltext), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ivanova, A., Kashubin, A., Juhojuntti, N., Kummerow, J., Henninges, J., Juhlin, C., Lüth, S., Ivandic, M. (2012): Monitoring and volumetric estimation of injected CO2 using 4D seismic, petrophysical data, core measurements and well logging: a case study at Ketzin, Germany. - Geophysical Prospecting, 60, 5, 957-973.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01045.x


https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_244943
Abstract
More than 50 000 tons of CO2 have been injected at Ketzin into the Stuttgart Formation, a saline aquifer, at approximately 620 m depth, as of summer 2011. We present here results from the 1st repeat 3D seismic survey that was performed at the site in autumn 2009, after about 22 000 tons of CO2 had been injected. We show here that rather complex time-lapse signatures of this CO2 can be clearly observed within a radius of about 300 m from the injection well. The highly irregular amplitude response within this radius is attributed to the heterogeneity of the injection reservoir. Time delays to a reflection below the injection level are also observed. Petrophysical measurements on core samples and geophysical logging of CO2 saturation levels allow an estimate of the total amount of CO2 visible in the seismic data to be made. These estimates are somewhat lower than the actual amount of CO2 injected at the time of the survey and they are dependent upon the choice of a number of parameters. In spite of some uncertainty, the close agreement between the amount injected and the amount observed is encouraging for quantitative monitoring of a CO2 storage site using seismic methods.