Dynamics of an idealized Beaufort Gyre : 1. The effect of a small beta and lack of western boundaries

Thumbnail Image
Date
2016-02-12
Authors
Yang, Jiayan
Proshutinsky, Andrey
Lin, Xiaopei
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1002/2015JC011296
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Arctic Ocean
Beaufort Gyre
Freshwater content
Beta effect
Western boundary
Abstract
The Beaufort Gyre in the Arctic Ocean differs from a typical moderate-latitude gyre in some major aspects of its dynamics. First, it is located in a basin without a western boundary, which is essential for closing midlatitude circulations. Second, the gradient in Coriolis parameter, β, is small and so the validity of the Sverdrup balance is uncertain. In this paper, we use an idealized two-layer model to examine several processes that are related to these two issues. In a circular basin with closed geostrophic contours in interior, the variability of vorticity in the upper layer is dominated by eddies. But in the time-mean circulation, the main dynamical balance in the basin's interior is between the curl of wind stress and the eddy vorticity fluxes. The torque of friction becomes important along the boundary where the rim current is strong. It is found that the smallness of β has only a relatively small impact in a circular basin without a meridional boundary. The gyre is considerably more sensitive to the existence of a meridional boundary. The time-mean circulation weakens considerably when a peninsula is inserted between the model's center and the rim. (One side of the peninsula is dynamically equivalent to a midlatitude western boundary.) The gyre's sensitivity to β has also increased significantly when a meridional boundary is present. Subsurface ridges have similar effects on the gyre as a boundary, indicating that such topographic features may substitute, to some extents, the dynamical role of a western boundary.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2016. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 121 (2016): 1249–1261, doi:10.1002/2015JC011296.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 121 (2016): 1249–1261
Cruises
Cruise ID
Cruise DOI
Vessel Name