Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Differences in Variability of Discharge Frequency between Primary and Secondary Muscle Spindle Afferent Endings of the Cat

Abstract

THE frequency of action potentials in a nerve fibre has long been known to be a function of the input intensity. Fluctuations in frequency when the stimulus is held constant have often been considered merely as unwanted ‘noise’ limiting the accuracy of the experimental results. However, these fluctuations may also limit the amount of information which can be transmitted down a nerve fibre and so are of interest per se. In a receptor or an isolated axon, these fluctuations may result from the basic processes of action potential initiation and are of interest in this context. If the variability had the same basis in different cells (for example, resistive noise), one would expect that it would be smaller, the larger the cell or axon, and this is often the case1. However, one of us (P. B. C. M.) noticed that the discharge initiated from single secondary endings of muscle spindles of the cat seemed to be considerably more regular than that from the primary endings, though these latter have the larger afferent nerve fibres2; later this was also found to have been noticed by others3,4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verveen, A., Acta Morphologica Neerlando-Scandinavica, 5, 79 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matthews, P. B. C., Physiol. Rev., 44, 219 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eldred, E., and Tokizane, T., Amer. J. Physiol., 183, 612 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hongo, T. (personal communication).

  5. Ten Hoopen, M., and Verveen, A. A., in Nerve, Brain and Memory Models, edit. by Wiener, N., and Schade, J. P. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stein, R. B., Biophysic. J., 5, 173 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harvey, R. J., and Matthews, P. B. C., J. Physiol., 157, 370 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matthews, P. B. C., J. Physiol., 169, 58P (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stein, R. B., J. Physiol. (1965).

  10. Verveen, A. A., and Derksen, H. E., Kybernetik, 2, 152 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katz, B., J. Physiol., 111, 248 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

STEIN, R., MATTHEWS, P. Differences in Variability of Discharge Frequency between Primary and Secondary Muscle Spindle Afferent Endings of the Cat. Nature 208, 1217–1218 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/2081217a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2081217a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing