Abstract
MOST modern crinoids (Echinodermata) are comatulids, which lack the stalk characteristic of Palaeozoic crinoids. The specialisation and adaptation to different ecological niches made possible by loss of the stalk have resulted in several different ways of spreading the arms and pinnules in an array for suspension feeding. Until the 1960s, most observations were based on specimens in aquaria. These suggested that the comatulids sit on the substratum with the mouth orientated upwards, the arms stretched out in the form of a broad funnel or collecting bowl. The crinoid was thought to wait passively for a rain of its food material from above1. This feeding posture is used by some deep water crinoids2,3. Direct observations of the feeding behaviour of a shallow water comatulid in the Red Sea during the 1960s demonstrated that the arms are withdrawn during the day, but at night are arrayed in a vertical plane to form a filtration fan. This fan is orientated perpendicular to a prevailing weak current, filtering some 40,000 1 of water at a current speed of 2 cm sā1 during one period of activity4. These observations and a review of deep-sea photographs indicated that modern crinoids favour an environment with moderate currents and are to some degree current-seeking (rheophilic)5. Application of these ideas to the palaeocology of Palaeozoic stalked crinoids suggested that most were rheophilic, using the stalk to raise the calyx above the substratum and allowing the arms to be outspread in a planar, circular filtration fan2. The morphology of some ancient forms, however, was considered indicative of a rheophobic mode of life.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hyman, L. H., The Invertebrates: Echinodermata, 100 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955).
Breimer, A., Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet., B 72, 139 (1969).
Peres, J. M., Bull. Inst. OcƩanogr. Monaco, 56, 1 (1959).
Magnus, D. B. E., Natur Mus., 93, 355 (1963).
Fell, H. B., in Physiology of Echinodermata (edit. by Boolootian, R. A.), 49 (Interscience, New York, 1966).
Meyer, D. L., thesis, Yale Univ. (1971).
Meyer, D. L., Mar. Biol. (in the press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MACURDA, D., MEYER, D. Feeding Posture of Modern Stalked Crinoids. Nature 247, 394ā396 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/247394a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/247394a0
This article is cited by
-
Vertical distribution of epibenthic megafauna of a large seamount west of Cape Verde islands (tropical North Atlantic)
Marine Biodiversity (2024)
-
First record of tropical myzostomid population size structure and host infestation in Myzostoma khanhkhoaense (Myzostomida: Annelida)
Biologia (2024)
-
Effects of different flow velocities on behavior and TRPA1 expression in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicas
Journal of Oceanology and Limnology (2020)
-
Crinoid diversity and their symbiotic communities at Bangka Island (North Sulawesi, Indonesia)
Marine Biodiversity (2020)
-
Form and function of the strangest crinoid stem: Devonian of Morocco
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.