Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Relativity and Indeterminacy

Abstract

IT is not clear why the subject of statistics should throw any light on this problem, as Dr. G. W. Scott Blair suggests. There are two possible logical foundations for the use of statistics in physics: either, in the framework of a fully deterministic theory, wherein statistics may be used for the discussion of problems of such complexity that the detailed application of the supposedly known physical laws is impracticable; or within a non-deterministic theory, where the most basic physical laws may be concerned with the statement of probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BONDI, H., GOLD, T. Relativity and Indeterminacy. Nature 170, 582–583 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/170582c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/170582c0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing