Skip to main content
Log in

Reward and punishment in learning with possible reference to punishment for crime

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the basis of Landahl's theory of two-choice learning it is shown that application of punishment for wrong responses, without giving award for correct ones, does not lead to complete learning, no matter how many trials are used. If initially a “wrong response” was learned, then an attempt to inhibit it by punishment alone will in a class of cases lead only to a 50% suppression of that wrong response. Possible connection with the problem of effectiveness of punishment as a deterrent for crime is mentioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Landahl, H. D. 1941. “Studies in the Mathematical Biophysics of Discrimination and Conditioning I.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,3, 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. 1965. “A Note on Equivalent Mathematical Models.”Ibid., Special Issue,27, 161–175.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1960.Mathematical Biophysics, Vol. II Chapter XIV. Third Edition. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rashevsky, N. Reward and punishment in learning with possible reference to punishment for crime. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 28, 477–481 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476827

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476827

Keywords

Navigation