Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A scanning electron microscopic investigation of in vitro osteogenesis

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Chick limb mesenchymal cells differentiate into muscle, cartilage, fibrous, and bone tissue. Previous reports show that when stage 24 limb mesenchymal cells are cultured in vitro, chondrocytes, myocytes, fibrocytes, and osteoblasts can be identified on the basis of morphological and biochemical parameters. The study reported here demonstrates that phenotypic expression in culture seems to be dependent on the initial plating density, Scanning electron microscopic observations indicate that when stage 24 limb mesenchymal cells are initially seeded at high densities (5 × 106 cells per 35 mm culture dish), mounds of cells appear in culture. These mounds represent cartilage nodules composed of a fine fibrous matrix and chondrocytes, surrounded by a loose fibrous connective tissue matrix. Cultures initially plated at intermediate densities (2.0–2.5 × 106 cells/35 mm culture dish) produce a flattened layer of fibrocytes overlying a matrix of collagen fibers and calcium phosphate deposits as determined by electron-microprobe analysis; these observations are indicative of osteoblast expression. Cells seeded at this intermediate density appear larger and possess greater surface area than cells seeded at high density. It is suggested that conditions that permit such increased cell surface area coupled with a relative compaction due to cell crowding may provide conditions permissive for osteogenesis. Based on morphological criteria, it appears that chick limb mesenchymal cell osteogenesis in vitro is not associated with chondrogenesis but represents a separate route of phenotypic expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller, E., Matukas, G., Piez, K., Powers, M.: Characterization of chick bone collagen and compositional changes occurring with maturation, J. Biol. Chem.242:5481–5489, 1967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hascall, V.C., Oegema, T.R., Browns, M., Caplan, A.I.: Isolation and characterization of proteoglycans from avian embryonic limb bud chondrocytes grownin vitro, J. Biol. Chem.251:3511–3519, 1976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Osdoby, P., Caplan, A.I.: The possible differentiation of osteogenic elementsin vitro from chick limb mesodermal cells, Dev. Biol.52:283–299, 1976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. von der Mark, K., von der Mark, H.: Immunological and biochemical studies of collagen type transitions duringin vitro chondrogenesis of chick limb mesenchymal cells, J. Cell Biol.73:736–747, 1977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zull, J.E., Krug, S., Abel, D., Caplan, A.I.: Development of parathyroid hormone- and calcitonin-activated adenylate cyclases in embryonic chicken limb and in cultured cells from embryonic chicken limb, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.75:3871–3875, 1978

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Osdoby, P., Caplan, A.I.: Osteogenesis in cultures of limb mesenchymal cells, Dev. Biol.73:84–102, 1979

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamburger, V., Hamilton, H.S.: A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo, J. Morphol.88:49–92, 1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caplan, A.I.: Effect of nicotinamide-sensitive teratogen 3-acetyl pyridine on chick limb cells in culture, Exp. Cell Res.62:341–355, 1970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caplan, A.I.: Muscle, cartilage, and bone development and differentiation from chick limb mesenchymal cells. In D.A. Ede, J.R. Hinchliffe, and M. Balls (eds): Vertebrate Limb and Somite Morphogenesis, pp. 199–213. Cambridge University Press, London, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, T.: Techniques for the preservation of the three-dimensional structure in preparing specimens for the electron microscope, Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci.13:130–134, 1951

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, S.J., Boyde, A., Pawley, J.B.: Osteoblast and collagen orientation, Cell Tissue Res.159:73–80, 1975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vertel, B.M.: Limb bud developmentin vitro. An SEM study. In: Scanning Electron Microscropy 1976. Part V. Proceedings of the Workshop on Advances in Biomedical Applications of the SEM, pp. 291–298. ILT Research Institute, Chicago

  13. Vertel, B.M., Dorfman, A.: An immunohistochemical study of extracellular matrix formation during chondrogenesis, Dev. Biol.62:1–12, 1978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levitt, D., Ho, P.L., Dorfman, A.: Effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine on ultrastructure of developing limb bud cellsin vitro, Dev. Biol.43:75–90, 1975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyde, A., Jones, S.J., Binderman, I., Harrel, A.: Scanning electron microscopy of bone cells in culture, Cell Tissue Res.166:65–70, 1976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Binderman, I., Duskin, D., Harrel, A., Katzir, E., Sachs, L.: Formation of bone tissue in culture from isolated bone cells, J. Cell Biol.61:427–439, 1974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahrens, P.B., Solursh, M., Reiter, R.S.: Stage related capacity for limb chondrogenesis in cell culture, Dev. Biol.60:69–82, 1977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Umansky, R.: The effect of cell population density on the developmental fate of reaggregating mouse limb bud mesenchyme, Dev. Biol.13:31–56, 1966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fell, H.: The histogenesis of cartilage and bone in the long bones of the embryonic fowl, J. Morphol.40:417–459, 1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thorogood, P., Hinchliffe, J.: An analysis of the condensation process during chondrogenesis in the embryonic hind limb, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.33:581–606, 1975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Solursh, M., Reiter, R.S.: Determination of limb bud chondrocytes during a transient block of the cell cycle, Cell Differentiation4:131–137, 1975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Caplan, A., Koutroupas, S.: The control of muscle and cartilage development in the chick limb: The role of differential vascularization, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.29:571–583, 1973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ali, S.Y., Sajdera, S.W., Anderson, H.C.: Isolation and characterization of calcifying matrix vesicles from epiphyseal cartilage, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.67:1513–1520, 1970

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson, H.C.: Vesicles associated with calcification in the matrix of epiphyseal cartilage, J. Cell Biol.41:59–72, 1969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osdoby, P., Caplan, A.I. A scanning electron microscopic investigation of in vitro osteogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int 30, 43–50 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408605

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408605

Key words

Navigation